Subjective time dilation as a result of entropy.
duration perception
entropy
information theory
oddball paradigm
time perception
Journal
PsyCh journal
ISSN: 2046-0260
Titre abrégé: Psych J
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101598595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
28
07
2023
accepted:
31
08
2023
medline:
5
12
2023
pubmed:
31
10
2023
entrez:
31
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Subjective time dilation is an effect discovered using the oddball paradigm, where expanding visual stimuli, but not shrinking ones, induce a prolongation of subjective temporal perception compared to static stimuli. This disparity is often seen as another demonstration of humans' evolved reaction to approaching threats, since visual expansion resembles approaching potential threats and warrants extra attention. In this study, we show that by manipulating the relative sizes of stimuli, both expanding and shrinking stimuli can induce prolongation of subjective time in an oddball paradigm. We propose an alternative explanation based on information theory, linking subjective temporal perception to entropy, an objective property of stimulus that is information uncertainty. Temporal function as a logistic function thus serves as the framework inside which content functions like information processing are able to operate coherently.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
757-762Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31371018
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31771213
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Aiba, T., & Stevens, S. (1964). Relation of brightness to duration and luminance under light- and dark-adaptation. Vision Research, 4(7-8), 391-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(64)90011-2
Ball, W., & Tronick, E. (1971). Infant responses to impending collision: Optical and real. Science, 171(3973), 818-820. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3973.818
Bao, Y., Szymaszek, A., Wang, X., Oron, A., Pöppel, E., & Szelag, E. (2013). Temporal order perception of auditory stimuli is selectively modified by tonal and non-tonal language environments. Cognition, 129(3), 579-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.019
Billington, J., Wilkie, R. M., Field, D., & Wann, J. P. (2011). Neural processing of imminent collision in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 278(1711), 1476-1481. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1895
Bower, T. G. R., Broughton, J. M., & Moore, M. K. (1971). Infant responses to approaching objects: An indicator of response to distal variables. Perception & Psychophysics, 9(2), 193-196. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03212627
Coker-Appiah, D. S., White, S. F., Clanton, R., Yang, J., Martin, A., & Blair, R. (2013). Looming animate and inanimate threats: The response of the amygdala and periaqueductal gray. Social Neuroscience, 8(6), 621-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.839480
de Haan, A. M., Smit, M., Van der Stigchel, S., & Dijkerman, H. C. (2016). Approaching threat modulates visuotactile interactions in peripersonal space. Experimental Brain Research, 234, 1875-1884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4571-2
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
Hervais-Adelman, A., Legrand, L. B., Zhan, M., Tamietto, M., de Gelder, B., & Pegna, A. J. (2015). Looming sensitive cortical regions without V1 input: Evidence from a patient with bilateral cortical blindness. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 9, 51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2015.00051
Long, G. M., & Beaton, R. J. (1980). The effects of spatial frequency and target type on perceived duration. Perception & Psychophysics, 28(5), 413-421. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03204885
MATLAB. (2019). Version 9.7.0 (R2019b). The MathWorks Inc.
New, J. J., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). Subjective time dilation: Spatially local, object-based, or a global visual experience? Journal of Vision, 9(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.2.4
Schlotterer, G. R. (1977). Response of the locust descending movement detector neuron to rapidly approaching and withdrawing visual stimuli. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 55(8), 1372-1376. https://doi.org/10.1139/z77-179
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Thomas, E. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1975). On the duality of simultaneous time and size perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(1), 44-48. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199365
Tse, P. U., Intriligator, J., Rivest, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(7), 1171-1189. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196844
Vagnoni, E., Lourenco, S. F., & Longo, M. R. (2012). Threat modulates perception of looming visual stimuli. Current Biology, 22(19), R826-R827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.053
Van Wassenhove, V., Buonomano, D. V., Shimojo, S., & Shams, L. (2008). Distortions of subjective time perception within and across senses. PLoS One, 3(1), e1437. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001437
Wang, T., Luo, Y., Pöppel, E., & Bao, Y. (2021). Serial dependence in temporal perception reveals the dynamics of constructing an internal reference frame. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.31.446431
Wittmann, M., Van Wassenhove, V., Craig, B., & Paulus, M. P. (2010). The neural substrates of subjective time dilation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.002.2010
Zhao, C., Enriquez, P., Izadifar, M., Pöppel, E., Bao, Y., & Zabotkina, V. (2022). Complementarity of mental content and logistic algorithms in a taxonomy of cognitive functions. PsyCh Journal., 11(6), 973-979. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.602