Supporting the Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus With Comprehensive Self-Tracking: Mixed Methods Study of Wearable Sensors.
behavior change
gestational diabetes
mobile application
self-discovery
self-management
self-tracking
user experience
wearable sensor
Journal
JMIR diabetes
ISSN: 2371-4379
Titre abrégé: JMIR Diabetes
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101719410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Oct 2023
31 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
03
11
2022
accepted:
14
09
2023
revised:
16
06
2023
medline:
31
10
2023
pubmed:
31
10
2023
entrez:
31
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasing health risk for pregnant women as well as their children. Telehealth interventions targeted at the management of GDM have been shown to be effective, but they still require health care professionals for providing guidance and feedback. Feedback from wearable sensors has been suggested to support the self-management of GDM, but it is unknown how self-tracking should be designed in clinical care. This study aimed to investigate how to support the self-management of GDM with self-tracking of continuous blood glucose and lifestyle factors without help from health care personnel. We examined comprehensive self-tracking from self-discovery (ie, learning associations between glucose levels and lifestyle) and user experience perspectives. We conducted a mixed methods study where women with GDM (N=10) used a continuous glucose monitor (CGM; Medtronic Guardian) and 3 physical activity sensors: activity bracelet (Garmin Vivosmart 3), hip-worn sensor (UKK Exsed), and electrocardiography sensor (Firstbeat 2) for a week. We collected data from the sensors, and after use, participants took part in semistructured interviews about the wearable sensors. Acceptability of the wearable sensors was evaluated with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) questionnaire. Moreover, maternal nutrition data were collected with a 3-day food diary, and self-reported physical activity data were collected with a logbook. We found that the CGM was the most useful sensor for the self-discovery process, especially when learning associations between glucose and nutrition intake. We identified new challenges for using data from the CGM and physical activity sensors in supporting self-discovery in GDM. These challenges included (1) dispersion of glucose and physical activity data in separate applications, (2) absence of important trackable features like amount of light physical activity and physical activities other than walking, (3) discrepancy in the data between different wearable physical activity sensors and between CGMs and capillary glucose meters, and (4) discrepancy in perceived and measured quantification of physical activity. We found the body placement of sensors to be a key factor in measurement quality and preference, and ultimately a challenge for collecting data. For example, a wrist-worn sensor was used for longer compared with a hip-worn sensor. In general, there was a high acceptance for wearable sensors. A mobile app that combines glucose, nutrition, and physical activity data in a single view is needed to support self-discovery. The design should support tracking features that are important for women with GDM (such as light physical activity), and data for each feature should originate from a single sensor to avoid discrepancy and redundancy. Future work with a larger sample should involve evaluation of the effects of such a mobile app on clinical outcomes. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03941652; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03941652.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasing health risk for pregnant women as well as their children. Telehealth interventions targeted at the management of GDM have been shown to be effective, but they still require health care professionals for providing guidance and feedback. Feedback from wearable sensors has been suggested to support the self-management of GDM, but it is unknown how self-tracking should be designed in clinical care.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate how to support the self-management of GDM with self-tracking of continuous blood glucose and lifestyle factors without help from health care personnel. We examined comprehensive self-tracking from self-discovery (ie, learning associations between glucose levels and lifestyle) and user experience perspectives.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a mixed methods study where women with GDM (N=10) used a continuous glucose monitor (CGM; Medtronic Guardian) and 3 physical activity sensors: activity bracelet (Garmin Vivosmart 3), hip-worn sensor (UKK Exsed), and electrocardiography sensor (Firstbeat 2) for a week. We collected data from the sensors, and after use, participants took part in semistructured interviews about the wearable sensors. Acceptability of the wearable sensors was evaluated with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) questionnaire. Moreover, maternal nutrition data were collected with a 3-day food diary, and self-reported physical activity data were collected with a logbook.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We found that the CGM was the most useful sensor for the self-discovery process, especially when learning associations between glucose and nutrition intake. We identified new challenges for using data from the CGM and physical activity sensors in supporting self-discovery in GDM. These challenges included (1) dispersion of glucose and physical activity data in separate applications, (2) absence of important trackable features like amount of light physical activity and physical activities other than walking, (3) discrepancy in the data between different wearable physical activity sensors and between CGMs and capillary glucose meters, and (4) discrepancy in perceived and measured quantification of physical activity. We found the body placement of sensors to be a key factor in measurement quality and preference, and ultimately a challenge for collecting data. For example, a wrist-worn sensor was used for longer compared with a hip-worn sensor. In general, there was a high acceptance for wearable sensors.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A mobile app that combines glucose, nutrition, and physical activity data in a single view is needed to support self-discovery. The design should support tracking features that are important for women with GDM (such as light physical activity), and data for each feature should originate from a single sensor to avoid discrepancy and redundancy. Future work with a larger sample should involve evaluation of the effects of such a mobile app on clinical outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03941652; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03941652.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37906216
pii: v8i1e43979
doi: 10.2196/43979
pmc: PMC10646680
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03941652']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e43979Informations de copyright
©Mikko Kytö, Saila Koivusalo, Heli Tuomonen, Lisbeth Strömberg, Antti Ruonala, Pekka Marttinen, Seppo Heinonen, Giulio Jacucci. Originally published in JMIR Diabetes (https://diabetes.jmir.org), 31.10.2023.
Références
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Mar 20;6(3):e71
pubmed: 29559428
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;218(4):453.e1-453.e7
pubmed: 29425836
Qual Health Res. 2014 Apr;24(4):575-85
pubmed: 24682021
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Mar;12(2):260-264
pubmed: 28420257
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 6;8(11):e22212
pubmed: 32975198
Women Birth. 2014 Sep;27(3):190-5
pubmed: 24881523
Midwifery. 2013 Jun;29(6):637-45
pubmed: 22877761
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Nov;40(11):1528-1537
pubmed: 30297272
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;126(2):326-331
pubmed: 26241422
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;11(5):1015-1027
pubmed: 28560898
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012 Jun;83(2):330-9
pubmed: 22808719
Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Sep;94(3):819-30
pubmed: 21795438
ACS Sens. 2021 May 28;6(5):1745-1760
pubmed: 34008960
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 11;9(11):e030884
pubmed: 31719080
Front Pediatr. 2017 Apr 13;5:69
pubmed: 28451583
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;19(13):
pubmed: 35805717
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
J Electrocardiol. 1998 Apr;31(2):101-9
pubmed: 9588655
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 May;16(5):277-83
pubmed: 24758729
Midwifery. 2018 Mar;58:102-108
pubmed: 29329023
J Matern Fetal Med. 2001 Feb;10(1):52-8
pubmed: 11332421
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Mar 01;4(2):328-36
pubmed: 20307393
Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Apr 25;7(1):7
pubmed: 33896420
J Behav Med. 2016 Dec;39(6):981-994
pubmed: 27412774
Scand J Caring Sci. 2010 Sep;24(3):454-62
pubmed: 19878489
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2015 Mar;22(1):45-53
pubmed: 25614324
Lancet. 2009 May 23;373(9677):1773-9
pubmed: 19465232
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Aug;20(8):1894-1902
pubmed: 29603547
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:271-281
pubmed: 29496507
Anaesthesia. 1994 Mar;49(3):249-50
pubmed: 8147522
J Sci Med Sport. 2010 Sep;13(5):496-502
pubmed: 20005170
Comput Inform Nurs. 2018 Jul;36(7):340-349
pubmed: 29742550
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 27;6:19920
pubmed: 26814139
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Dec;76:1-8
pubmed: 28974460
Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(9):522
pubmed: 25052856
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Aug 04;13:2729-2741
pubmed: 32801819
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2000;2 Suppl 1:S67-71
pubmed: 11469635
J Physiother. 2019 Jan;65(1):37-42
pubmed: 30573442
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Mar;20(3):180-188
pubmed: 29470094
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 7;20(1):76
pubmed: 32028931
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 21;18(12):
pubmed: 34205744
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Feb 7;19(1):60
pubmed: 30732571
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Jul;44(7):1228-1234
pubmed: 29797375
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Mar;28(3):1092-1102
pubmed: 29144567
Women Birth. 2018 Aug;31(4):e232-e238
pubmed: 29055674
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 01;16:920
pubmed: 27586887
Am Psychol. 2016 Oct;71(7):577-589
pubmed: 27690486
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Oct 12;9(4):e36987
pubmed: 36222806
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;180(4):903-16
pubmed: 10203659
Sleep. 2004 Nov 1;27(7):1405-17
pubmed: 15586794
Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2019 Dec;3(4):
pubmed: 32656490
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 May;9(3):556-63
pubmed: 25591859
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Jul;36(9):891-897
pubmed: 30818406
Nutr Res Pract. 2010 Apr;4(2):142-8
pubmed: 20461203
Midwifery. 2016 Sep;40:141-7
pubmed: 27553869
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Sep 18;12:99
pubmed: 22988897
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):577-9
pubmed: 20067952
J Pers Med. 2023 Jan 26;13(2):
pubmed: 36836452
Clin Diabetes. 2016 Jan;34(1):3-21
pubmed: 26807004
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Apr;49(4):793-800
pubmed: 28319983
Digit Health. 2019 Feb 06;5:2055207619828220
pubmed: 30792878
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 7;12(11):e066292
pubmed: 36344008
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jun 05;6(6):e131
pubmed: 29871856
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 Sep;21(3):712-29
pubmed: 27169679
Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Mar;15(3):235-245
pubmed: 29486547
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Sep;68(6):656-670
pubmed: 28139173
Prev Med. 2010 Mar;50(3):123-8
pubmed: 20053370
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Jul 05;15:145
pubmed: 26142482
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Mar;50(3):624-633
pubmed: 29189666
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 May;23(3):440-8
pubmed: 26644399
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e15873
pubmed: 32706663
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1 Suppl 1):S68-76
pubmed: 22157777
Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2019 Mar;3(1):
pubmed: 31080941
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):198
pubmed: 32252676
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 30;7(1):e11836
pubmed: 30698533
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 17;19(1):34
pubmed: 30654747
J Physiother. 2016 Oct;62(4):188-96
pubmed: 27637772
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 20;10(8):e0134813
pubmed: 26292225
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Sep;46(9):1702-9
pubmed: 24518194