Difficulties in Carotid Artery Stenting Due to Calcified Nodules: A Case Report.

calcified nodule carotid artery carotid artery stenting carotid endarterectomy carotid stenosis

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Historique:
accepted: 05 09 2023
medline: 1 11 2023
pubmed: 1 11 2023
entrez: 1 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The feasibility of carotid artery stenting (CAS) for carotid stenosis with severely calcified plaque remains controversial. Understanding the features associated with CAS difficulty in lesions with severe calcification is crucial. Calcified nodules, one of the morphological patterns of calcified plaques, have not been assessed for their association with the feasibility of CAS, even though they are associated with failure of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in coronary arteries. We present a rare case of carotid stenosis with calcified nodules in whom CAS was unsuccessful and who was subsequently successfully treated by carotid endarterectomy (CEA). A 79-year-old man presented with a transient ischemic attack caused by severe stenosis of the right internal carotid artery and opted for CAS. During the procedure, multiple attempts at balloon angioplasty using a 3.5-mm balloon were made, but effective dilation could not be achieved, resulting in recoil. Subsequently, the patient underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and the excised specimen revealed a calcified nodule, a large nodular calcified plaque protruding into the lumen. The patient was discharged with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 at 19 days after the CEA. The protrusion of this large calcified nodule into the lumen was deemed responsible for the inadequate stent dilation. Although rarely reported in carotid stenosis, calcified nodules might represent a challenging plaque type for CAS treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37908903
doi: 10.7759/cureus.46233
pmc: PMC10613551
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

e46233

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023, Sakurada et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Radiol Med. 2017 Jun;122(6):449-457
pubmed: 28236046
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Apr 6;77(13):1599-1611
pubmed: 33795033
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar;97(4):634-645
pubmed: 32181576
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000 May;20(5):1262-75
pubmed: 10807742
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Sep;29(8):1590-3
pubmed: 18499788
Exp Ther Med. 2016 May;11(5):2028-2032
pubmed: 27168846
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Mar 01;18(3):342-349
pubmed: 27076364
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Mar 11;51(10):1014-21
pubmed: 18325441
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):685-90
pubmed: 21889703
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Dec;158(12):2393-2397
pubmed: 27614435
Neuroradiology. 2010 Sep;52(9):831-6
pubmed: 19953236
Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Aug 21;16(8):19978-88
pubmed: 26307978
J Endovasc Ther. 2007 Oct;14(5):676-86
pubmed: 17924734

Auteurs

Kokyo Sakurada (K)

Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, JPN.

Kiyofumi Yamada (K)

Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, JPN.

Kisaki Amemiya (K)

Department of Pathology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, JPN.

Eriko Yamaguchi (E)

Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, JPN.

Hiroharu Kataoka (H)

Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, JPN.

Classifications MeSH