Difficulties in Carotid Artery Stenting Due to Calcified Nodules: A Case Report.
calcified nodule
carotid artery
carotid artery stenting
carotid endarterectomy
carotid stenosis
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
accepted:
05
09
2023
medline:
1
11
2023
pubmed:
1
11
2023
entrez:
1
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The feasibility of carotid artery stenting (CAS) for carotid stenosis with severely calcified plaque remains controversial. Understanding the features associated with CAS difficulty in lesions with severe calcification is crucial. Calcified nodules, one of the morphological patterns of calcified plaques, have not been assessed for their association with the feasibility of CAS, even though they are associated with failure of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in coronary arteries. We present a rare case of carotid stenosis with calcified nodules in whom CAS was unsuccessful and who was subsequently successfully treated by carotid endarterectomy (CEA). A 79-year-old man presented with a transient ischemic attack caused by severe stenosis of the right internal carotid artery and opted for CAS. During the procedure, multiple attempts at balloon angioplasty using a 3.5-mm balloon were made, but effective dilation could not be achieved, resulting in recoil. Subsequently, the patient underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and the excised specimen revealed a calcified nodule, a large nodular calcified plaque protruding into the lumen. The patient was discharged with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 at 19 days after the CEA. The protrusion of this large calcified nodule into the lumen was deemed responsible for the inadequate stent dilation. Although rarely reported in carotid stenosis, calcified nodules might represent a challenging plaque type for CAS treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37908903
doi: 10.7759/cureus.46233
pmc: PMC10613551
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
e46233Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Sakurada et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Radiol Med. 2017 Jun;122(6):449-457
pubmed: 28236046
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Apr 6;77(13):1599-1611
pubmed: 33795033
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar;97(4):634-645
pubmed: 32181576
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000 May;20(5):1262-75
pubmed: 10807742
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Sep;29(8):1590-3
pubmed: 18499788
Exp Ther Med. 2016 May;11(5):2028-2032
pubmed: 27168846
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Mar 01;18(3):342-349
pubmed: 27076364
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Mar 11;51(10):1014-21
pubmed: 18325441
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):685-90
pubmed: 21889703
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Dec;158(12):2393-2397
pubmed: 27614435
Neuroradiology. 2010 Sep;52(9):831-6
pubmed: 19953236
Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Aug 21;16(8):19978-88
pubmed: 26307978
J Endovasc Ther. 2007 Oct;14(5):676-86
pubmed: 17924734