Genomic and demographic processes differentially influence genetic variation across the human X chromosome.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 06 01 2023
accepted: 08 06 2023
medline: 3 11 2023
pubmed: 1 11 2023
entrez: 1 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Many forces influence genetic variation across the genome including mutation, recombination, selection, and demography. Increased mutation and recombination both lead to increases in genetic diversity in a region-specific manner, while complex demographic patterns shape patterns of diversity on a more global scale. While these processes act across the entire genome, the X chromosome is particularly interesting because it contains several distinct regions that are subject to different combinations and strengths of these forces: the pseudoautosomal regions (PARs) and the X-transposed region (XTR). The X chromosome thus can serve as a unique model for studying how genetic and demographic forces act in different contexts to shape patterns of observed variation. We therefore sought to explore diversity, divergence, and linkage disequilibrium in each region of the X chromosome using genomic data from 26 human populations. Across populations, we find that both diversity and substitution rate are consistently elevated in PAR1 and the XTR compared to the rest of the X chromosome. In contrast, linkage disequilibrium is lowest in PAR1, consistent with the high recombination rate in this region, and highest in the region of the X chromosome that does not recombine in males. However, linkage disequilibrium in the XTR is intermediate between PAR1 and the autosomes, and much lower than the non-recombining X. Finally, in addition to these global patterns, we also observed variation in ratios of X versus autosomal diversity consistent with population-specific evolutionary history as well. While our results were generally consistent with previous work, two unexpected observations emerged. First, our results suggest that the XTR does not behave like the rest of the recombining X and may need to be evaluated separately in future studies. Second, the different regions of the X chromosome appear to exhibit unique patterns of linked selection across different human populations. Together, our results highlight profound regional differences across the X chromosome, simultaneously making it an ideal system for exploring the action of evolutionary forces as well as necessitating its careful consideration and treatment in genomic analyses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37910456
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287609
pii: PONE-D-23-00498
pmc: PMC10619814
doi:

Substances chimiques

Receptor, PAR-1 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0287609

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM124827
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Cotter et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Genome Biol Evol. 2009 Apr 30;1:56-66
pubmed: 20333177
Nature. 2003 Jun 19;423(6942):825-37
pubmed: 12815422
Gigascience. 2015 Feb 25;4:7
pubmed: 25722852
Funct Integr Genomics. 2013 Aug;13(3):285-93
pubmed: 23708688
Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Jun;72(6):1527-35
pubmed: 12740762
Trends Genet. 2009 Jun;25(6):278-84
pubmed: 19481288
Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Jul 15;18(14):2555-66
pubmed: 19383631
Nat Genet. 2010 Oct;42(10):830-1
pubmed: 20802480
PLoS Genet. 2021 Apr 19;17(4):e1009532
pubmed: 33872316
PLoS Genet. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000568
pubmed: 19609352
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):781-7
pubmed: 23223713
Genetics. 2012 Oct;192(2):533-98
pubmed: 22673804
Theor Popul Biol. 2008 Dec;74(4):291-301
pubmed: 18817799
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2003 Dec;13(6):562-8
pubmed: 14638315
Gigascience. 2019 Jul 1;8(7):
pubmed: 31289836
PLoS Biol. 2004 Oct;2(10):e286
pubmed: 15361935
Nat Commun. 2017 Apr 25;8:14994
pubmed: 28440270
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Mar;10(3):195-205
pubmed: 19204717
Science. 2010 Jul 2;329(5987):75-8
pubmed: 20595611
Science. 2009 May 22;324(5930):1035-44
pubmed: 19407144
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 14;106(15):6094-8
pubmed: 19307568
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 21;5:12376
pubmed: 26197429
Mol Ecol. 2012 Feb;21(3):597-612
pubmed: 22211311
Science. 2005 Oct 14;310(5746):321-4
pubmed: 16224025
Nat Rev Genet. 2020 Aug;21(8):476-492
pubmed: 32472059
Hum Mol Genet. 1998 Jan;7(1):1-11
pubmed: 9384598
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jul 2;46(W1):W537-W544
pubmed: 29790989
Genetics. 2012 Jan;190(1):5-22
pubmed: 22219506
Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2520-2
pubmed: 22908215
Genetics. 2000 Sep;156(1):297-304
pubmed: 10978293
Genome Res. 2003 Feb;13(2):281-6
pubmed: 12566406
Genetics. 1981 Jun;98(2):441-59
pubmed: 17249094
Evolution. 2012 Feb;66(2):505-16
pubmed: 22276544
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D493-6
pubmed: 14681465
Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Aug;7(8):645-53
pubmed: 16847464
Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Aug;3(8):611-21
pubmed: 12154384
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1961 Mar;47(3):403-15
pubmed: 16590840
Gene. 2006 Mar 1;368:94-100
pubmed: 16356662
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7823):79-84
pubmed: 32663838
Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484):
pubmed: 32193295
Gene. 2003 Oct 23;317(1-2):67-77
pubmed: 14604793
Nature. 2018 Sep;561(7723):338-342
pubmed: 30185906
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016 Dec;41:62-71
pubmed: 27599147
Curr Genomics. 2007 Apr;8(2):129-36
pubmed: 18660847
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 May 29;286(1903):20181976
pubmed: 31113325
Science. 2019 Jan 25;363(6425):
pubmed: 30679340
Science. 1999 Oct 29;286(5441):964-7
pubmed: 10542153
Nature. 2007 May 10;447(7141):167-77
pubmed: 17495919
Nature. 1984 Sep 13-19;311(5982):119-23
pubmed: 6088994
Bioessays. 2011 Dec;33(12):938-45
pubmed: 22006834
PLoS Genet. 2016 Aug 10;12(8):e1006199
pubmed: 27508305
PLoS Genet. 2010 Feb 26;6(2):e1000862
pubmed: 20195501
BMC Genet. 2009 Nov 10;10:71
pubmed: 19903357
Nature. 2005 Mar 17;434(7031):325-37
pubmed: 15772651
Evolution. 2007 Dec;61(12):3001-6
pubmed: 17971168
Genetics. 2004 Dec;168(4):2261-9
pubmed: 15611190
Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jun 5;94(6):827-44
pubmed: 24836452
Genetics. 2019 Jan;211(1):289-304
pubmed: 30459280
Nature. 2010 Oct 28;467(7319):1099-103
pubmed: 20981099
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Oct 04;12(11):756-66
pubmed: 21969038
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Oct;27(10):2312-21
pubmed: 20453016
Genetics. 2015 Sep;201(1):263-79
pubmed: 26209245
PLoS Genet. 2006 Sep 22;2(9):e148
pubmed: 17044736
Nat Genet. 2009 Jan;41(1):66-70
pubmed: 19098910
Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5(10):1863-71
pubmed: 24036954
Nat Genet. 2009 Jan;41(1):8-10
pubmed: 19112457
Nat Genet. 1999 Jan;21(1 Suppl):56-60
pubmed: 9915503
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2003;4:293-340
pubmed: 14527305
Nat Genet. 2011 Jul 24;43(8):741-3
pubmed: 21775991
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74
pubmed: 26432245
Genetics. 2001 May;158(1):109-22
pubmed: 11333222
Cell. 2017 Sep 21;171(1):59-71.e21
pubmed: 28938123
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Feb;66(2):557-66
pubmed: 10677316
Science. 2004 Apr 23;304(5670):581-4
pubmed: 15105499
J Bone Miner Metab. 2017 Jul;35(4):448-455
pubmed: 27628044
Nat Genet. 2002 Sep;32(1):135-42
pubmed: 12161752
Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289-303
pubmed: 8375663
Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):831-40
pubmed: 3147214
Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 15;26(6):841-2
pubmed: 20110278
Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23-35
pubmed: 4407212
Genetics. 2016 May;203(1):485-92
pubmed: 27010023
Trends Genet. 2011 Sep;27(9):358-67
pubmed: 21962971
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Jun;80(6):1024-36
pubmed: 17503322
J Hum Genet. 2013 Sep;58(9):627-34
pubmed: 23863748
Nature. 2015 May 7;521(7550):81-4
pubmed: 25707793
Bioessays. 2006 Mar;28(3):290-300
pubmed: 16479583
Genome Res. 2007 Apr;17(4):520-6
pubmed: 17351134
Trends Genet. 2002 Jul;18(7):337-40
pubmed: 12127766
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jan;66(1):69-83
pubmed: 10631137

Auteurs

Daniel J Cotter (DJ)

Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.

Timothy H Webster (TH)

Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.

Melissa A Wilson (MA)

School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.
Center for Evolution and Medicine, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH