10-day decitabine versus 3 + 7 chemotherapy followed by allografting in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND

Many older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia die or cannot undergo allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) due to toxicity caused by intensive chemotherapy. We hypothesised that replacing intensive chemotherapy with decitabine monotherapy could improve outcomes.

METHODS

This open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at 54 hospitals in nine European countries. Patients aged 60 years and older who were newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia and had not yet been treated were enrolled if they had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less and were eligible for intensive chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive decitabine or standard chemotherapy (known as 3 + 7). For the decitabine group, decitabine (20 mg/m

FINDINGS

Between Dec 1, 2014, and Aug 20, 2019, 606 patients were randomly assigned to the decitabine (n=303) or 3 + 7 (n=303) group. Following an interim analysis which showed futility, the IDMC recommended on May 22, 2019, that the study continued as planned considering the risks and benefits for the patients participating in the study. The cutoff date for the final analysis presented here was June 30, 2021. At a median follow-up of 4·0 years (IQR 2·9-4·8), 4-year overall survival was 26% (95% CI 21-32) in the decitabine group versus 30% (24-35) in the 3 + 7 group (hazard ratio for death 1·04 [95% CI 0·86-1·26]; p=0·68). Rates of on-protocol allogeneic HSCT were similar between groups (122 [40%] of 303 patients for decitabine and 118 [39%] of 303 patients for 3+7). Rates of grade 3-5 adverse events were 254 (84%) of 302 patients in the decitabine group and 279 (94%) of 298 patients in the 3 + 7 group. The rates of grade 3-5 infections (41% [125 of 302] vs 53% [158 of 298]), oral mucositis (2% [seven of 302] vs 10% [31 of 298]) and diarrhoea (1% [three of 302] vs 8% [24 of 298]) were lower in the decitabine group than in the 3 + 7 group. Treatment-related deaths were reported for 12% (35 of 302) of patients in the decitabine group and 14% (41 of 298) in the 3 + 7 group.

INTERPRETATION

10-day decitabine did not improve overall survival but showed a better safety profile compared with 3 + 7 chemotherapy in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia eligible for intensive chemotherapy. Decitabine could be considered a better-tolerated and sufficiently efficacious alternative to 3 + 7 induction in fit older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia without favourable genetics.

FUNDING

Janssen Pharmaceuticals.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests MLü received research support to his institution from Janssen and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); is on the advisory boards for AbbVie, Astex, Janssen-Cilag, Otsuka, and Syros; and is currently working in an ongoing trial with a study drug provided by Cheplapharm. MK received research funding from Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Pierre Fabre, Janssen, and Immunocore. SF received personal funding by BMS and Celgene. AG received a grant for study conduct, and drug supply for Dacogen from Janssen Pharma Educational. JHJ received support for molecular analysis from Janssen and EORTC. FE received personal funding from AbbVie, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, and Syros. RW received consulting fees from Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Kite, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; payment from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Kite, Gilead, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen. HB is secretary of EORTC Leukemia Group; received research funding by the German Jose Carreras Leukemia Foundation and German Research Foundation; and honoraria from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, and Servier. UD received personal honoraria for participation in a data safety monitoring board from Avencell Europe and data safety monitoring board for an acute myeloid leukaemia CAR-T cell trial from Avencell Europe. FB received payments to his institution from Incyte Biosciences, Takeda, ExCellThera, and MaaT Pharma. SS received funding to his institution from Janssen Pharmaceuticals. All other authors declare no competing interests.