Efficacy for writing self-regulation, attitude toward writing, and quality of second grade students' writing.

attitudes gender language self-efficacy self-regulation text quality writing

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 23 07 2023
accepted: 29 09 2023
medline: 2 11 2023
pubmed: 2 11 2023
entrez: 2 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Motivational beliefs, such as writing self-efficacy and attitude toward writing, are believed to foster or hinder writing by influencing if one chooses to write, how much effort is committed to writing, and what cognitive resources writers apply. In the current study, we examined self-efficacy for writing self-regulation and attitude toward writing of 2,124 Grade 2 Norwegian students (1,069 girls; 1,055 boys). We investigated if there were differences in each of these beliefs between girls and boys and students who differed in their language status (Norwegian first language, Norwegian and another language both first language, or language other than Norwegian first language). We further tested if each of these writing motivational beliefs made statistically unique contributions to predicting the quality of students' writing. In each of these analyses, we controlled for variance related to individual- and school factors. Girls were more positive about writing than boys, and they were confident about their abilities to self-regulate writing. Students with Norwegian and another language both as first language ("bilingual" students) had a more positive attitude toward writing than the other two language groups. Efficacy for writing self-regulation and attitude toward writing both made statistically significant unique contributions to predicting the quality of students writing, although these two writing beliefs collectively accounted for just 2% of the variance in writing quality scores once individual- and school-factors were controlled. Recommendations for future research and implications of the finding are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37915520
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1265785
pmc: PMC10616524
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1265785

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Skar, Graham and Huebner.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Read Writ. 2021;34(7):1791-1822
pubmed: 33519085
Psychol Rep. 1992 Jun;70(3 Pt 1):711-20
pubmed: 1620761
Read Writ. 2023 Jun 8;:1-29
pubmed: 37359029
Multivariate Behav Res. 2017 Mar-Apr;52(2):149-163
pubmed: 27925836
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2001 Jul;26(3):366-381
pubmed: 11414726
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 21;8:1406
pubmed: 28878707
J Learn Disabil. 1993 Apr;26(4):237-49
pubmed: 8515188
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Sep;90(3):580-603
pubmed: 31513289
Am Psychol. 2019 May-Jun;74(4):445-458
pubmed: 30234314
Front Psychol. 2023 May 23;14:1130149
pubmed: 37287784
Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):121-38
pubmed: 17563168
Read Writ Q. 2012 Jan 1;28(1):51-69
pubmed: 22736933

Auteurs

Gustaf B Skar (GB)

Department of Teacher Education, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Steve Graham (S)

MLF Teachers College, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.

Alan R Huebner (AR)

Department of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.

Classifications MeSH