Effects of polyploidization and their evolutionary implications are revealed by heritable polyploidy in the haplodiploid wasp Nasonia vitripennis.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 22 08 2022
accepted: 23 06 2023
medline: 6 11 2023
pubmed: 2 11 2023
entrez: 2 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recurrent polyploidization occurred in the evolutionary history of most Eukaryota. However, how neopolyploid detriment (sterility, gigantism, gene dosage imbalances) has been overcome and even been bridged to evolutionary advantage (gene network diversification, mass radiation, range expansion) is largely unknown, particularly for animals. We used the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis, a rare insect system with heritable polyploidy, to begin addressing this knowledge gap. In Hymenoptera the sexes have different ploidies (haploid males, diploid females) and neopolyploids (diploid males, triploid females) occur for various species. Although such polyploids are usually sterile, those of N. vitripennis are reproductively capable and can even establish stable polyploid lines. To assess the effects of polyploidization, we compared a long-established polyploid line, the Whiting polyploid line (WPL) and a newly generated transformer knockdown line (tKDL) for fitness traits, absolute gene expression, and cell size and number. WPL polyploids have high male fitness and low female fecundity, while tKDL polyploids have poor male mate competition ability and high fertility. WPL has larger cells and cell number reduction, but the tKDL does not differ in this respect. Expression analyses of two housekeeping genes indicated that gene dosage is linked to sex irrespective of ploidy. Our study suggests that polyploid phenotypic variation may explain why some polyploid lineages thrive and others die out; a commonly proposed but difficult-to-test hypothesis. This documentation of diploid males (tKDL) with impaired competitive mating ability; triploid females with high fitness variation; and hymenopteran sexual dosage compensation (despite the lack of sex chromosomes) all challenges general assumptions on hymenopteran biology. We conclude that polyploidization is dependent on the duplicated genome characteristics and that genomes of different lines are unequally suited to survive diploidization. These results demonstrate the utility of N. vitripennis for delineating mechanisms of animal polyploid evolution, analogous to more advanced polyploid plant models.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37917617
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288278
pii: PONE-D-22-23470
pmc: PMC10621845
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0288278

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Leung et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000 Dec;3(6):488-92
pubmed: 11074380
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2017 Nov;90:23-33
pubmed: 28927841
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Oct 3;8(10):3357-3366
pubmed: 30139764
Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2009 Oct;2009(10):pdb.prot5310
pubmed: 20147055
Annu Rev Genet. 2000;34:401-437
pubmed: 11092833
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13875-9
pubmed: 19667210
Am Nat. 2019 Jun;193(6):881-896
pubmed: 31094595
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 26;102(30):10742-6
pubmed: 16020532
Evol Appl. 2017 Oct 13;11(2):243-253
pubmed: 29387159
Heredity (Edinb). 2010 Mar;104(3):270-7
pubmed: 20087393
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2015 Dec;35:119-25
pubmed: 26656231
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Sep;14(9):348-352
pubmed: 10441308
Science. 2020 Nov 27;370(6520):1115-1118
pubmed: 33243892
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):234-247
pubmed: 26467853
Cell. 2007 Nov 2;131(3):452-62
pubmed: 17981114
J Insect Sci. 2014 Jan 01;14:
pubmed: 25527596
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 19;7(1):901
pubmed: 28424460
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2013;140(2-4):151-70
pubmed: 23838539
Planta. 2016 Feb;243(2):281-96
pubmed: 26715561
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2013;140(2-4):185-203
pubmed: 23796636
J Biol. 2009;8(10):87
pubmed: 20003177
Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(7):8696-8721
pubmed: 22942729
Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Nov;6(11):836-46
pubmed: 16304599
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2013;140(2-4):256-69
pubmed: 23817224
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1999 Oct;10(5):517-22
pubmed: 10597635
Science. 2010 Apr 30;328(5978):620-3
pubmed: 20431014
Nature. 2003 Mar 27;422(6930):433-8
pubmed: 12660784
Arthropod Struct Dev. 2019 Jul;51:41-51
pubmed: 31357033
Gene. 2023 Jan 30;851:146974
pubmed: 36309242
Front Zool. 2006 Jan 05;3:1
pubmed: 16393347
Science. 2010 Jan 15;327(5963):343-8
pubmed: 20075255
Cladistics. 2013 Oct;29(5):466-542
pubmed: 34798768
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jun;17(12):2854-64
pubmed: 18482258
Heredity (Edinb). 2010 Mar;104(3):260-9
pubmed: 20087390
Science. 2007 Jan 12;315(5809):206
pubmed: 17218519
Heredity (Edinb). 2012 Mar;108(3):302-11
pubmed: 21878985
Hereditas. 1968;59(1):169-87
pubmed: 5662632
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 1;115(18):4713-4718
pubmed: 29674453
Curr Biol. 2005 May 10;15(9):824-7
pubmed: 15886099
Am J Bot. 2019 Feb;106(2):280-291
pubmed: 30779448
Sci China Life Sci. 2012 Apr;55(4):301-11
pubmed: 22566086
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jan;19(1):1-3
pubmed: 16701215
PLoS Genet. 2015 Dec 28;11(12):e1005683
pubmed: 26710087
Entomol Exp Appl. 2019 Jul;167(7):655-669
pubmed: 31598002
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 13;101(28):10374-9
pubmed: 15232002
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007 Jun;18(3):371-8
pubmed: 17292644
Genetics. 2017 Mar;205(3):1215-1228
pubmed: 28064166
Front Genet. 2018 Oct 23;9:480
pubmed: 30405691
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 30;281(1785):20140411
pubmed: 24789901
Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:534-46
pubmed: 20671102
Nat Rev Genet. 2001 May;2(5):333-41
pubmed: 11331899
Genetics. 2006 Feb;172(2):981-9
pubmed: 16219780
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jul 22;23(15):
pubmed: 35897665
J Genomics. 2015 Jan 01;3:1-19
pubmed: 25628761
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(1):486-94
pubmed: 17406271
Genetics. 1960 Jul;45(7):949-70
pubmed: 17247978
Genesis. 2003 Mar;35(3):185-91
pubmed: 12640624
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Oct;10(10):725-32
pubmed: 19652647
Genetics. 1998 May;149(1):233-42
pubmed: 9584099
Sci Adv. 2020 Apr 03;6(14):eaaz9808
pubmed: 32284986
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 20;97(13):7051-7
pubmed: 10860970
Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 May;14(3):578-87
pubmed: 24215457
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 26;108(17):7096-101
pubmed: 21402904
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Apr;37(6):e45
pubmed: 19237396
PLoS Biol. 2011 Aug;9(8):e1001127
pubmed: 21886479
Basic Life Sci. 1979;13:277-312
pubmed: 550829
Trends Plant Sci. 2003 Dec;8(12):582-90
pubmed: 14659707
Neurosci Lett. 2003 Mar 13;339(1):62-6
pubmed: 12618301

Auteurs

Kelley Leung (K)

Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Louis van de Zande (L)

Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Leo W Beukeboom (LW)

Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH