Association Between State Paid Family and Medical Leave and Breastfeeding, Depression, and Postpartum Visits.


Journal

Obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1873-233X
Titre abrégé: Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401101

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 17 06 2023
accepted: 27 07 2023
pubmed: 2 11 2023
medline: 2 11 2023
entrez: 2 11 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the association of state paid family and medical leave policies with the likelihood of breastfeeding, postpartum depression symptoms, and attendance of the postpartum visit. This was a cross-sectional study that used 2016-2019 data from PRAMS (Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System) for 43 states and Washington, DC. We describe the association of state paid family and medical leave generosity with rates of breastfeeding, postpartum depression symptoms, and attendance of the postpartum visit. Logistic and Poisson regression models tested the significance of state paid family and medical leave coverage generosity after controlling for individual respondent sociodemographic characteristics, with sensitivity analyses for respondents with deliveries covered by Medicaid insurance. Of the 143,131 respondents, representative of an estimated 7,426,725 population, 26.2% lived in eight states and DC with the most generous paid family and medical leave, 20.5% lived in nine states with some paid family and medical leave, and 53.3% lived in 26 states with little or no paid family and medical leave. Overall, 54.8% reported breastfeeding at 6 months or at time of the survey, ranging from 59.5% in the most generous paid family and medical leave states to 51.0% in states with the least paid family and medical leave coverage. Postpartum depression symptoms varied from 11.7% in the most generous states to 13.3% in the least generous states (both P <.001). State differences in postpartum visit attendance rates (90.9% overall) did not differ significantly. After adjusting for respondent characteristics, compared with states with the least paid family and medical leave, breastfeeding was 9% more likely (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1.09, 95% CI, 1.07-1.11) in states with the strongest paid family and medical leave coverage and 32% more likely (aIRR 1.32, 95% CI, 1.25-1.39) in analyses limited to respondents with deliveries covered by Medicaid insurance. A more generous state paid family and medical leave policy was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of postpartum depression symptoms compared with states with the least paid family and medical leave (adjusted odds ratio 0.85, 95% CI, 0.76-0.94) and a modest but significant increase in postpartum visit attendance (aIRR 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) among respondents with deliveries covered by Medicaid insurance. Respondents from states with strong paid family and medical leave had a greater likelihood of breastfeeding and had lower odds of postpartum depression symptoms, with stronger associations among respondents with deliveries covered by Medicaid insurance. Despite major potential health benefits of paid family and medical leave, the United States remains one of the few countries without federally mandated paid parental leave.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37917931
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005428
pii: 00006250-990000000-00942
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

14-22

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Références

Gupta P, Goldman T, Hernandez E, Rose M. Paid family and medical leave is critical for low-wage workers and their families. Accessed March 8, 2023. https://www.clasp.org/publications/fact-sheet/paid-family-and-medical-leave-critical-low-wage-workers-and-their-families/
Congressional Research Service. Paid family and medical leave in the United States. Accessed March 8, 2023. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R44835
Brown S, Herr J, Roy R, Klerman JA. Employee and worksite perspectives of the Family and Medical Leave Act: results from the 2018 surveys. Accessed March 8, 2023. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/OASP/evaluation/pdf/WHD_FMLA2018SurveyResults_FinalReport_Aug2020.pdf
Goodman JM, Richardson DM, Dow WH. Racial and ethnic inequities in paid family and medical leave: United States, 2011 and 2017-2018. Am J Public Health 2022;112:1050–8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306825
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306825
Rossin-Slater M. Maternity and family leave policy. Accessed March 8, 2023. http://www.nber.org/papers/w23069
Kortsmit K, Li R, Cox S, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Perrine CG, D’Angelo DV, et al. Workplace leave and breastfeeding duration among postpartum women, 2016-2018. Am J Public Health 2021;111:2036–45. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2021.306484
doi: 10.2105/ajph.2021.306484
Huang R, Yang M. Paid maternity leave and breastfeeding practice before and after California’s implementation of the nation’s first paid family leave program. Econ Hum Biol 2015;16:45–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2013.12.009
doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2013.12.009
Jou J, Kozhimannil KB, Abraham JM, Blewett LA, McGovern PM. Paid maternity leave in the United States: associations with maternal and infant health. Matern Child Health J 2018;22:216–25. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2393-x
doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2393-x
Doran EL, Bartel AP, Ruhm CJ, Waldfogel J. California’s paid family leave law improves maternal psychological health. Soc Sci Med 2020;256:113003. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113003
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113003
Van Niel MS, Bhatia R, Riano NS, de Faria L, Catapano-Friedman L, Ravven S, et al. The impact of paid maternity leave on the mental and physical health of mothers and children: a review of the literature and policy implications. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2020;28:113–26. doi: 10.1097/hrp.0000000000000246
doi: 10.1097/hrp.0000000000000246
Mirkovic KR, Perrine CG, Scanlon KS. Paid maternity leave and breastfeeding outcomes. Birth 2016;43:233–9. doi: 10.1111/birt.12230
doi: 10.1111/birt.12230
Pac JE, Bartel AP, Ruhm CJ, Waldfogel J. Paid family leave and breastfeeding: evidence from California. Accessed March 8, 2023. http://www.nber.org/papers/w25784
Hamad R, Modrek S, White JS. Paid family leave effects on breastfeeding: a quasi-experimental study of US policies. Am J Public Health 2019;109:164–6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2018.304693
doi: 10.2105/ajph.2018.304693
Shulman HB, D’Angelo DV, Harrison L, Smith RA, Warner L. The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): overview of design and methodology. Am J Public Health 2018;108:1305–13. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2018.304563
doi: 10.2105/ajph.2018.304563
Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Browner WS. Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med 1997;12:439–45. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00076.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00076.x
National Partnership for Women & Families. Raising expectations: a state-by-state analysis of laws that help working family caregivers. Accessed November 6, 2022. https://www.nationalpartnership.org/our-work/economic-justice/raising-expectations.html
Zou G. A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:702–6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh090
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh090
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. PRAMS methodology. Accessed July 17, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/prams/methodology.htm
Schenck SM. Effect of state paid family leave policies on inequalities in maternity leave usage in the United States. Int Adv Econ Res 2020;26:199–201. doi: 10.1007/s11294-020-09781-5
doi: 10.1007/s11294-020-09781-5
Rossin M. The effects of maternity leave on children’s birth and infant health outcomes in the United States. J Health Econ 20112011;30:221–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.01.005
doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.01.005
Baker M, Milligan K. Maternal employment, breastfeeding, and health: evidence from maternity leave mandates. J Health Econ 2008;27:871–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.006
doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.006
Thulier D, Mercer J. Variables associated with breastfeeding duration. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2009;38:259–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01021.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01021.x
Rossin-Slater M, Ruhm CJ, Waldfogel J. The effects of California’s paid family leave program on mothers’ leave-taking and subsequent labor market outcomes. J Policy Anal Manage 2013;32:224–45. doi: 10.1002/pam.21676
doi: 10.1002/pam.21676
Washbrook E, Ruhm CJ, Waldfogel J, Han W-J. Public policies, women’s employment after childbearing, and child well-being. B E J Econ Anal Pol 2011;11:2938. doi: 10.2202/1935-1682.2938
doi: 10.2202/1935-1682.2938
Appelbaum E, Milkman R. Unfinished business: paid family leave in California and the future of U.S. work-family policy. Cornell University Press; 2013.

Auteurs

Madeline F Perry (MF)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, and Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

Classifications MeSH