Rituximab as maintenance therapy for ANCA-associated vasculitides: pooled analysis and long-term outcome of 277 patients included in the MAINRITSAN trials.
Autoimmune Diseases
Rituximab
Systemic vasculitis
Journal
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1468-2060
Titre abrégé: Ann Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Nov 2023
02 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
24
06
2023
accepted:
14
10
2023
medline:
3
11
2023
pubmed:
3
11
2023
entrez:
2
11
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of azathioprine (AZA), 18-month fixed-schedule rituximab (RTX), 18-month tailored RTX and 36-month RTX in preventing relapses in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis who achieved a complete remission after induction therapy. Patients treated with 36-month RTX received either a fixed or a tailored regimen for the first 18 months and a fixed regimen for the last 18 months (36-month fixed/fixed RTX and 36-month tailored/fixed RTX, respectively). The Maintenance of Remission using Rituximab in Systemic ANCA-associated Vasculitis (MAINRITSAN) trials sequentially compared: 18-month fixed-schedule RTX versus AZA (MAINRITSAN); 18-month fixed-schedule RTX versus 18-month tailored-RTX (MAINRITSAN2); and extended therapy to 36 months with four additional RTX infusions after MAINRITSAN2 versus placebo (MAINRITSAN3). Patients were then followed prospectively through month 84 and their data were pooled to analyse relapses and adverse events. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival at month 84. 277 patients were enrolled and divided in 5 groups: AZA (n=58), 18-month fixed-schedule RTX (n=97), 18-month tailored-RTX (n=40), 36-month tailored/fixed RTX (n=42), 36-month fixed/fixed RTX (n=41). After adjustment for prognostic factors, 18-month fixed-schedule RTX was superior to AZA in preventing major relapses at month 84 (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.71). The 18-month tailored-RTX regimen was associated with an increased risk of major relapse compared with fixed-schedule regimen (HR 2.92, 95% CI 1.43 to 5.96). The risk of major relapse was similar between 36-month fixed/fixed and 18-month fixed-RTX (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.25). According to these results, it appears that the 84-month remission rate is higher with an 18-month fixed RTX regimen compared with AZA and 18-month tailored RTX. Also, extending RTX to 36 months does not appear to reduce the long-term relapse rate compared with the 18-month fixed RTX regimen. However, as this study was underpowered to make this comparison, further prospective studies are needed to determine the potential long-term benefits of extending treatment in these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37918894
pii: ard-2023-224623
doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224623
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Investigateurs
Christian Agard
(C)
Julien Allard
(J)
Jean-Benoît Arlet
(JB)
Denis Bagneres
(D)
Edouard Begon
(E)
Anne-Bérangère Beucher
(AB)
Claire Blanchard-Delaunay
(C)
Frédéric Bocquentin
(F)
Anthony Bonnin
(A)
Ali Boumallassa
(A)
Benoit Brihaye
(B)
Mathias Buchler
(M)
Sébastien Canet
(S)
Richard Damade
(R)
Isabelle de Lacroix-Szmania
(I)
Christian Delafosse
(C)
Sébastien Delbes
(S)
Xavier Delbrel
(X)
Mathilde de Menthon
(M)
Claire de Moreuil
(C)
Robin Dhote
(R)
Bertrand Dunogué
(B)
Cécile-Audrey Durel
(CA)
Marc Fabre
(M)
Olivier Fain
(O)
Hélène Francois
(H)
Marie Frimat
(M)
Jean-Michel Galempoix
(JM)
Helder Gil
(H)
Bernard Gilson
(B)
Guillaume Gondran
(G)
Fréderic Grassin
(F)
Isabelle Guichard
(I)
Constance Guillaud
(C)
Hassan Kassem
(H)
Abdeldjallil Koreichi
(A)
Xavier Kyndt
(X)
Laure Lahaxe
(L)
Nathalie Lerolle
(N)
Guillaume Leveiller
(G)
Olivier Lidove
(O)
Marie Lino-Daniel
(M)
Nadine Meaux-Ruault
(N)
Roderich Meckenstock
(R)
Stéphanie Mestrallet
(S)
Luc Mouthon
(L)
Thomas Papo
(T)
Romain Paule
(R)
Simona Pavel
(S)
Laurent Perard
(L)
Serge Perrot
(S)
Vincent Poindron
(V)
Mathieu Puyade
(M)
Nolwenn Rabot
(N)
Alain Ramassamy
(A)
Alexis Régent
(A)
Claire Rigothier
(C)
Sophie Rivière
(S)
Raphaèle Seror
(R)
Aurélie Schiffman
(A)
Nicolas Schleinitz
(N)
Damien Sene
(D)
Audrey Sultan
(A)
Nathalie Tieulie
(N)
Christine Vinter
(C)
Stéphane Vinzio
(S)
Ursula Warzocha
(U)
Lidwine Wemeau
(L)
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare compting interest as follows: Dr BT reports receiving consulting and speaking fees (Roche, LFB, Grifols, GSK). Dr XP reports receiving speaking fees and honoraria (Pfizer, LFB, Roche) and a research grant (Pfizer). Dr. LG reports receiving fees for serving on an advisory board from GlaxoSmithKline and lecture fees from Roche, Actelion, Pfizer, CSL Behring, LFB Pharma, and Octapharma. Dr. CP reports receiving fees for serving on advisory boards from Roche, Genzyme, and GlaxoSmithKline, lecture fees from Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and EuroImmune, and grant support from Roche. Dr. AK reports receiving lecture fees from Roche and travel support from Roche and Amgen. Dr. FM reports receiving personal fees from Actelion and travel support from Sobi and LFB Pharma. Dr. PG reports receiving personal fees from Gambro and LEO Pharma. Dr. TQ reports receiving travel support from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Alexion, and Actelion. Dr. Blanchard-Delaunay reports receiving personal fees from CSL Behring. Dr. PG reports receiving travel support from Octapharma, LFB Pharma, Roche, and Novartis. Dr. P-LC reports receiving travel support from Gambro, Bellco, Roche, Hemotech, and Sanofi. Dr. NL reports receiving travel support from GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Hamidou reports receiving lecture fees from Roche and LFB Pharma, personal fees from Actelion, and travel support from Roche, Actelion, LFB Pharma, and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. MD reports receiving personal fees from Fresenius Medical Care. Dr. ED reports receiving lecture fees and travel support from Shire, Amgen, and Genzyme, and grant support from Roche. Dr. BB reports receiving grant support from Roche/Chugai. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.