Clinical Outcomes and Safety Comparison of Vertebroplasty, Balloon Kyphoplasty, and Vertebral Implant for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures.
Journal
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
ISSN: 1936-959X
Titre abrégé: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003708
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2023
11 2023
Historique:
received:
18
03
2023
accepted:
14
09
2023
pmc-release:
01
11
2024
medline:
10
11
2023
pubmed:
3
11
2023
entrez:
2
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Vertebral compression fracture represents a major health burden for the aging populations globally. However, limited studies exist on the relative efficacy and safety of surgical interventions for vertebral compression fracture. Here, we aim to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes following vertebral augmentation using balloon kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and SpineJack vertebral implant. An institutional review board-approved, retrospective, multi-institutional review of patients undergoing vertebral augmentation with kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and/or a SpineJack vertebral implant was performed between 2018 and 2021. Primary outcomes included pre- and postprocedural pain ratings and vertebral body height restoration. The secondary outcome was a change in the local kyphotic angle. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare outcomes across 3 treatment options. Complications were reviewed during and 30-90 days after the procedure. Vertebral augmentation of 344 vertebral compression fracture levels was performed during the study period. Sixty-seven patients had 79 kyphoplasty procedures (55% women; mean age, 64.2 [SD, 12.3] years). Seventy-four patients underwent a mean of 84 vertebroplasty procedures (51% women; mean age, 63.5 [SD, 12.8] years), and 61 patients had a mean of 67 SpineJack vertebral implant procedures (57.4% women; mean age, 68.3 [SD, 10.6] years). Following kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and SpineJack vertebral implant, pain scores improved significantly ( The SpineJack vertebral implant showed equivalent pain improvement compared with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, but it had superior vertebral body height restoration and local kyphotic angle improvement. This study supports the SpineJack vertebral implant as a safe and effective alternative (adjunct) for vertebral augmentation, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe vertebral compression fractures for greater improvement in vertebral body height restoration.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Vertebral compression fracture represents a major health burden for the aging populations globally. However, limited studies exist on the relative efficacy and safety of surgical interventions for vertebral compression fracture. Here, we aim to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes following vertebral augmentation using balloon kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and SpineJack vertebral implant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An institutional review board-approved, retrospective, multi-institutional review of patients undergoing vertebral augmentation with kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and/or a SpineJack vertebral implant was performed between 2018 and 2021. Primary outcomes included pre- and postprocedural pain ratings and vertebral body height restoration. The secondary outcome was a change in the local kyphotic angle. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare outcomes across 3 treatment options. Complications were reviewed during and 30-90 days after the procedure.
RESULTS
Vertebral augmentation of 344 vertebral compression fracture levels was performed during the study period. Sixty-seven patients had 79 kyphoplasty procedures (55% women; mean age, 64.2 [SD, 12.3] years). Seventy-four patients underwent a mean of 84 vertebroplasty procedures (51% women; mean age, 63.5 [SD, 12.8] years), and 61 patients had a mean of 67 SpineJack vertebral implant procedures (57.4% women; mean age, 68.3 [SD, 10.6] years). Following kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and SpineJack vertebral implant, pain scores improved significantly (
CONCLUSIONS
The SpineJack vertebral implant showed equivalent pain improvement compared with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, but it had superior vertebral body height restoration and local kyphotic angle improvement. This study supports the SpineJack vertebral implant as a safe and effective alternative (adjunct) for vertebral augmentation, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe vertebral compression fractures for greater improvement in vertebral body height restoration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37918938
pii: ajnr.A8031
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8031
pmc: PMC10631528
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Cements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1345-1351Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM136577
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.
Références
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013 Jun 17;6:205-14
pubmed: 23818797
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Dec 10;2019:1386510
pubmed: 31886170
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015 Aug;30(7):720-5
pubmed: 25971847
Perm J. 2012 Fall;16(4):46-51
pubmed: 23251117
J Bone Metab. 2017 Aug;24(3):187-196
pubmed: 28955695
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Aug 15;12(3):295-321
pubmed: 30276087
Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E13-E28
pubmed: 28072794
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Mar;30(3):637-645
pubmed: 30488273
Instr Course Lect. 2019;68:585-591
pubmed: 32032083
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jun;8(6):636-42
pubmed: 25964376
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;91:628-32
pubmed: 27072339
Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):96-103
pubmed: 32068503
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):153-60
pubmed: 27630477
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 May 01;16(11):1-202
pubmed: 27298655
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Nov;101(7):857-9
pubmed: 26521157
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 May;39(5):798-806
pubmed: 29170272
Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(2):150-60
pubmed: 10501796
Spine J. 2019 Nov;19(11):1782-1795
pubmed: 31325625
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Dec;35(12):2227-36
pubmed: 25300981
Radiol Technol. 2015 Jan-Feb;86(3):301-20; quiz 321-3
pubmed: 25739109
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 May;62(5):829-35
pubmed: 24731176
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;90:391-396
pubmed: 26979922
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):865-77
pubmed: 17116555
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Jun;21(3):375-9
pubmed: 18458558
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jul;89:237-242
pubmed: 34119274
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Feb 08;13(1):32
pubmed: 29422073
J Spine Surg. 2016 Mar;2(1):13-20
pubmed: 27683690
Eur Radiol. 2018 Dec;28(12):4985-4991
pubmed: 29948067