Real-world treatment patterns of OTX-101 ophthalmic solution, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion, and lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a retrospective analysis.
Cyclosporine A
Discontinuation
Keratoconjunctivitis sicca
Persistence
Journal
BMC ophthalmology
ISSN: 1471-2415
Titre abrégé: BMC Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Nov 2023
02 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
22
06
2023
accepted:
12
10
2023
medline:
6
11
2023
pubmed:
3
11
2023
entrez:
3
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis that causes ocular surface inflammation and damage. The incidence of DED increases with age. Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CEQUA This real-world, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study utilized Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse claims from July 2019 to June 2021. The dataset included all patients with OTX-101 claims and patients with CsA or LFT claims randomly selected 2:1 to OTX-101. Patients were sorted into 3 cohorts based on index treatment. Index date was that of first treatment claim, and follow-up period was from index date to end of clinical activity or data availability. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), probability of discontinuation, and treatment persistence were assessed for OTX-101 vs. CsA, then OTX-101 vs. LFT. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age and prior DED treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to examine TTD. A logistic model evaluated association between index treatment and discontinuation. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P-values were reported, with statistically significant associations based on P-values < 0.05. Overall, 7102 patients (OTX-101 n = 1846; CsA n = 2248; LFT n = 3008) were eligible. Median TTD was 354 days for patients receiving OTX-101 vs. 241 days for CsA and 269 days for LFT. Log-rank test indicated TTD was significantly longer for patients on OTX-101 vs. CsA (P = 0.033). Patients on CsA were 35% more likely to discontinue treatment than patients on OTX-101; OTX-101 and LFT groups had similar discontinuation rates. After 360 days, 49.8% of patients receiving OTX-101 remained on treatment vs. 39.4% of patients on CsA (P = 0.036) and 44.0% of patients on LFT (P = 0.854). Patients receiving OTX-101 remained on treatment significantly longer and were significantly less likely to discontinue treatment than patients on CsA. Older patients remained on OTX-101 significantly longer than CsA. These findings highlight treatment pattern differences in patients with DED receiving these anti-inflammatory agents.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Dry eye disease (DED) is a disorder characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis that causes ocular surface inflammation and damage. The incidence of DED increases with age. Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CEQUA
METHODS
METHODS
This real-world, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study utilized Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse claims from July 2019 to June 2021. The dataset included all patients with OTX-101 claims and patients with CsA or LFT claims randomly selected 2:1 to OTX-101. Patients were sorted into 3 cohorts based on index treatment. Index date was that of first treatment claim, and follow-up period was from index date to end of clinical activity or data availability. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), probability of discontinuation, and treatment persistence were assessed for OTX-101 vs. CsA, then OTX-101 vs. LFT. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age and prior DED treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to examine TTD. A logistic model evaluated association between index treatment and discontinuation. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P-values were reported, with statistically significant associations based on P-values < 0.05.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 7102 patients (OTX-101 n = 1846; CsA n = 2248; LFT n = 3008) were eligible. Median TTD was 354 days for patients receiving OTX-101 vs. 241 days for CsA and 269 days for LFT. Log-rank test indicated TTD was significantly longer for patients on OTX-101 vs. CsA (P = 0.033). Patients on CsA were 35% more likely to discontinue treatment than patients on OTX-101; OTX-101 and LFT groups had similar discontinuation rates. After 360 days, 49.8% of patients receiving OTX-101 remained on treatment vs. 39.4% of patients on CsA (P = 0.036) and 44.0% of patients on LFT (P = 0.854).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Patients receiving OTX-101 remained on treatment significantly longer and were significantly less likely to discontinue treatment than patients on CsA. Older patients remained on OTX-101 significantly longer than CsA. These findings highlight treatment pattern differences in patients with DED receiving these anti-inflammatory agents.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37919692
doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03174-y
pii: 10.1186/s12886-023-03174-y
pmc: PMC10621228
doi:
Substances chimiques
lifitegrast
038E5L962W
Ophthalmic Solutions
0
Emulsions
0
Cyclosporine
83HN0GTJ6D
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
443Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec 1;140(12):1181-1192
pubmed: 36301551
Ophthalmology. 2000 May;107(5):967-74
pubmed: 10811092
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;202:47-54
pubmed: 30721689
Ophthalmology. 2017 Jan;124(1):53-60
pubmed: 28079022
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 01;13:1115-1122
pubmed: 31308620
Ophthalmology. 2019 Sep;126(9):1230-1237
pubmed: 30965064
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Dec;27(6):603-9
pubmed: 21999340
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 2;23(1):443
pubmed: 37919692
Ophthalmology. 2015 Dec;122(12):2423-31
pubmed: 26365210
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283
pubmed: 28736335
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 22;13:2285-2292
pubmed: 31819353
Ophthalmology. 2014 Feb;121(2):475-83
pubmed: 24289915
Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2013 Jun;1(2):51-57
pubmed: 23710423
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct 02;12:1921-1929
pubmed: 30323548
Ocul Surf. 2017 Oct;15(4):802-812
pubmed: 28797892
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;153(6):1050-60.e1
pubmed: 22330307
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):575-628
pubmed: 28736343
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):438-510
pubmed: 28736340
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 08;15:1041-1054
pubmed: 33727786
Ophthalmology. 1999 Apr;106(4):811-6
pubmed: 10201607
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 19;14:875-883
pubmed: 32256045
Ophthalmology. 2000 Apr;107(4):631-9
pubmed: 10768324