Keeping kin close? Geographies of family networks by race and income, 1981-2017.

demographics family dynamics family structure intergenerational relationships longitudinal research race

Journal

Journal of marriage and the family
ISSN: 0022-2445
Titre abrégé: J Marriage Fam
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0375376

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
medline: 3 11 2023
pubmed: 3 11 2023
entrez: 3 11 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study examined changes in geographic proximity to family members among race and income groups in the United States from 1981 to 2017. Close geographic proximity to family members can facilitate mutual support and strengthen family bonds. Some scholars argue that institutional sources of support have replaced many core family functions, which might mean that households are likely to live increasingly farther away from family. Advancing technology and changing labor market opportunities might reinforce this pattern. Yet, the ongoing cultural and emotional salience of family might curtail the effects of these factors on the increasing distance to family. We conducted a quantitative analysis of longitudinal data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). We utilized the multigenerational structure of the PSID and restricted-use geocodes to map kin proximity at every interview from 1981 to 2017. We cross-classified our sample by race and income, focusing on Black and White respondents across income quartiles ( High-income White respondents showed the greatest increases in distance from kin over time, whereas proximity to kin among other race-income groups was relatively stable. Proximate kin has become less central in the lives of high-income White households over time, whereas close proximity to kin has been the norm over time for other racial and income groups. These results have implications for racial and income differences in kin relations over time.

Sections du résumé

Objective UNASSIGNED
This study examined changes in geographic proximity to family members among race and income groups in the United States from 1981 to 2017.
Background UNASSIGNED
Close geographic proximity to family members can facilitate mutual support and strengthen family bonds. Some scholars argue that institutional sources of support have replaced many core family functions, which might mean that households are likely to live increasingly farther away from family. Advancing technology and changing labor market opportunities might reinforce this pattern. Yet, the ongoing cultural and emotional salience of family might curtail the effects of these factors on the increasing distance to family.
Method UNASSIGNED
We conducted a quantitative analysis of longitudinal data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). We utilized the multigenerational structure of the PSID and restricted-use geocodes to map kin proximity at every interview from 1981 to 2017. We cross-classified our sample by race and income, focusing on Black and White respondents across income quartiles (
Results UNASSIGNED
High-income White respondents showed the greatest increases in distance from kin over time, whereas proximity to kin among other race-income groups was relatively stable.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Proximate kin has become less central in the lives of high-income White households over time, whereas close proximity to kin has been the norm over time for other racial and income groups. These results have implications for racial and income differences in kin relations over time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37920193
doi: 10.1111/jomf.12911
pmc: PMC10621692
mid: NIHMS1938246
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

962-986

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG040213
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD069609
Pays : United States

Références

J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2018 Oct;181(4):1193-1209
pubmed: 30555215
Demography. 2017 Apr;54(2):631-653
pubmed: 28236137
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Apr;82(2):810-821
pubmed: 33414564
Fam Relat. 2013 Oct 1;62(4):609-624
pubmed: 25089067
Biom J. 2021 Feb;63(2):354-371
pubmed: 33103307
J Fam Issues. 2014 Nov;35(13):1824-1845
pubmed: 25368438
Popul Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;42(3):491-517
pubmed: 31456597
Demography. 2017 Aug;54(4):1277-1304
pubmed: 28681169
Annu Rev Sociol. 2013 Jul;39:275-290
pubmed: 25378767
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99
pubmed: 21225900
Math Popul Stud. 2019;26(4):208-237
pubmed: 33727765
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2019 Oct;38(5):615-654
pubmed: 31885410
Ethn Racial Stud. 2018;41(9):1594-1611
pubmed: 30245537
J Fam Issues. 2018 Sep;39(13):3535-3563
pubmed: 30083024
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114627
pubmed: 34875578
Soc Sci Res. 2019 Nov;84:102346
pubmed: 31674338
J Marriage Fam. 2022 Aug;84(4):1002-1023
pubmed: 36110339
J Marriage Fam. 2011 Aug 1;73(4):861-875
pubmed: 22199402
J Marriage Fam. 2021 Oct;83(5):1349-1372
pubmed: 34711997
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Sep 15;168(6):656-64
pubmed: 18682488
Demography. 2015 Apr;52(2):379-99
pubmed: 25794526
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(4):468-478
pubmed: 32309977
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Apr;82(2):822-840
pubmed: 33033415
Child Dev. 2006 Sep-Oct;77(5):1170-89
pubmed: 16999791
Popul Stud (Camb). 2018 Jul;72(2):235-251
pubmed: 29770726
J Aging Health. 2007 Dec;19(6):907-20
pubmed: 18165288
Ageing Soc. 2011 Oct;31(7):1084-1106
pubmed: 31798194
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2014 Jul;654(1):231-239
pubmed: 26478579

Auteurs

Amy Spring (A)

Department of Sociology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Elizabeth Ackert (E)

Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.

Sarah Roche (S)

Department of Sociology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Dionne Parris (D)

Department of Sociology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Kyle Crowder (K)

Department of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz (N)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Violence Prevention Research Program, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.

Classifications MeSH