New trends in science communication fostering evidence-informed policymaking.

dialogue model digitalisation evidence-informed policy-making open science science communication trust visualisation

Journal

Open research Europe
ISSN: 2732-5121
Titre abrégé: Open Res Eur
Pays: Belgium
ID NLM: 9918230081006676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
accepted: 18 10 2023
medline: 3 11 2023
pubmed: 3 11 2023
entrez: 3 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This article aims to assess novel trends in science communication relating to how policymakers in the field of innovation and digitalisation policy consume and use scientific findings. We investigate the mutual influence that science communication and policy have on each other and answer the question how emerging science communication trends in the science-policy nexus might influence the use of scientific findings in the policymaking process. By using Google and the largest scholarly repositories, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, and Academia.edu, from 1 TRESCA – Trustworthy, Reliable and Engaging Scientific Communication Approaches – is a research project aimed at understanding how science communication can help re-build trust in science and scientists. The project wants to create positive changes through common research activities with various stakeholders, e.g., the general public, scientists, journalists, and policymakers. Thus, TRESCA also aimed to identify the most important actual trends how communication between scientific experts and policymakers changed in the last decades in the field of innovation and digitalisation policy. We looked at how these trends might influence the way policymakers receive, interpret, and use scientific evidence during their daily work. The partners first checked various scientific and non-scientific documents concerning potential new communication trends between scientists and policymakers. The partners conducted interviews with policymakers working in four European countries (Austria, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands) and at the international/EU level. The interviews investigated the scientific data sources, data collection processes, science communication topics, channels, and formats frequently used by policymakers. We found that at least three new trends had strengthened in the last decades: (1) increasingly often more permanent formal relationships are developed between scientists and policymakers to cope with the more frequent and intense communication; (2) to enhance trust between scientists and policymakers, more transparent and reliable communication channels and formats are used; (3) policymakers need to understand more scientific information in less time therefore visual and digital communication formats are getting more widespread. After an online consultation process, practical recommendations were provided to policymakers on how to support more effective communication with scientists. This included the creation of more training opportunities, the increased use of communication guides, the promotion of fact-checking websites, or ways to motivate scientists to communicate with policymakers. These steps might support a novel communication process built on trust and the understanding of each other’s perspective.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
TRESCA – Trustworthy, Reliable and Engaging Scientific Communication Approaches – is a research project aimed at understanding how science communication can help re-build trust in science and scientists. The project wants to create positive changes through common research activities with various stakeholders, e.g., the general public, scientists, journalists, and policymakers. Thus, TRESCA also aimed to identify the most important actual trends how communication between scientific experts and policymakers changed in the last decades in the field of innovation and digitalisation policy. We looked at how these trends might influence the way policymakers receive, interpret, and use scientific evidence during their daily work. The partners first checked various scientific and non-scientific documents concerning potential new communication trends between scientists and policymakers. The partners conducted interviews with policymakers working in four European countries (Austria, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands) and at the international/EU level. The interviews investigated the scientific data sources, data collection processes, science communication topics, channels, and formats frequently used by policymakers. We found that at least three new trends had strengthened in the last decades: (1) increasingly often more permanent formal relationships are developed between scientists and policymakers to cope with the more frequent and intense communication; (2) to enhance trust between scientists and policymakers, more transparent and reliable communication channels and formats are used; (3) policymakers need to understand more scientific information in less time therefore visual and digital communication formats are getting more widespread. After an online consultation process, practical recommendations were provided to policymakers on how to support more effective communication with scientists. This included the creation of more training opportunities, the increased use of communication guides, the promotion of fact-checking websites, or ways to motivate scientists to communicate with policymakers. These steps might support a novel communication process built on trust and the understanding of each other’s perspective.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37920848
doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14769.2
pmc: PMC10618634
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

78

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Szüdi G et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No competing interests were disclosed.

Références

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4:13614-20
pubmed: 25225368
EMBO Rep. 2020 Sep 3;21(9):e51278
pubmed: 32748995
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Feb;44(1):4-13
pubmed: 16266777
Milbank Q. 2010 Dec;88(4):444-83
pubmed: 21166865
BMC Med. 2015 Dec 17;13:301
pubmed: 26675206
Vaccine. 2021 Sep 15;39(39):5453-5455
pubmed: 34446317

Auteurs

Gábor Szüdi (G)

Zentrum für Soziale Innovation, Wien, 1150, Austria.

Pamela Bartar (P)

Zentrum für Soziale Innovation, Wien, 1150, Austria.

Gorazd Weiss (G)

Zentrum für Soziale Innovation, Wien, 1150, Austria.

Giuseppe Pellegrini (G)

Observa - Science in Society, Vicenza, 36100, Italy.

Marina Tulin (M)

Communication Science Department, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1018, The Netherlands.

Tessa Oomen (T)

Department of Media and Communication, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3062, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH