Evaluation of the accuracy of direct intraoral scanner impressions for digital post and core in various post lengths: An in-vitro study.
CAD/CAM
digital dentistry
intraoral scanner
post and core
prosthodontics
Journal
Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]
ISSN: 1708-8240
Titre abrégé: J Esthet Restor Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101096515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Apr 2024
Historique:
revised:
25
08
2023
received:
18
03
2023
accepted:
16
10
2023
pubmed:
3
11
2023
medline:
3
11
2023
entrez:
3
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite the growing utilization of direct intraoral scanners (IOSs) in dentistry, there is a scarcity of research investigating their accuracy, specifically in post and core. Few studies have conducted comprehensive three-dimensional assessments and comparisons of IOSs with the conventional impression technique, particularly in different post space lengths. The purpose of this in vitro study was to digitally assess the accuracy of direct intraoral scanner (IOS) impressions for different post space lengths, specifically 6, 8, and 10 mm. A total of 45 typodont teeth (maxillary central incisors) were selected for this study. The teeth underwent endodontic treatment and were divided into three subgroups, each with 15 teeth, based on the desired post space lengths: 6, 8, and 10 mm. Intraoral scans of all specimens were acquired directly using the CEREC Primescan intraoral scanners by two trained examiners. The obtained scan data were compared with conventional impressions obtained using light and heavy bodies of polyvinyl siloxane (PVS). As a control, the conventional impressions were subsequently scanned using an inEos X5a lab scanner. The accuracy of the digital scans was evaluated in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds using the Geomagic Control X software. Statistical analysis was performed using Bonferroni Post-hoc and One-way ANOVA tests to analyze the data. The overall mean root mean square (RMS) deviations for the different post lengths across the three thirds groups were 58, 81, and 101 μm for the 6, 8, and 10 mm subgroups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the accuracy of the coronal and middle thirds among all subgroups (p > 0.5). However, in the apical third, the 10 mm subgroup exhibited a significantly lower accuracy (163 μm) compared to the 6 mm (96 μm) and 8 mm (131 μm) subgroups (p < 0.05). These results suggest that while the accuracy of intraoral scans using direct IOS impressions was consistent in the coronal and middle thirds regardless of the post length, there was a noticeable decrease in accuracy in the apical third, particularly with longer post lengths. Considering the limitations of this in vitro study, chairside direct IOS impressions offer a viable and clinically acceptable alternative to the conventional impression technique for post space lengths of 6 and 8 mm. However, as the post space length preparation increases, the accuracy of IOS decreases. The Chairside direct IOS enables expedited and efficient digital impression capture within the root canal, ensuring acceptable accuracy for intracanal post length preparation of up to 8 mm.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
673-679Informations de copyright
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Al-Omiri MK, Mahmoud AA, Rayyan MR, Abu-Hammad O. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with post-retained restorations: an overview. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1439-1449.
Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70(1):11-16.
Milot P, Stein RS. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68(3):428-435.
Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(4):412-417.
Lamichhane A, Xu C, Zhang FQ. Dental fiber-post resin base material: a review. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6(1):60-65.
Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(4):431-437.
Gomes GM, Monte-Alto RV, Santos GO, et al. Use of a direct anatomic post in a flared root canal: a three-year follow-up. Oper Dent. 2016;41(1):E23-E28.
Grandini S, Sapio S, Simonetti M. Use of anatomic post and core for reconstructing an endodontically treated tooth: a case report. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(3):243-247.
Tjan AH, Miller GD. Comparison of retentive properties of dowel forms after application of intermittent torsional forces. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52(2):238-242.
Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth. Post, core and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(5):611-619.
Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjögren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61(1):10-15.
Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64(4):419-424.
Ni CW, Chang CH, Chen TYF, Chuang SF. A multiparametric evaluation of post-restored teeth with simulated bone loss. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(3):322-330.
Figueiredo FED, Martins-Filho PRS, Faria-E-Silva AL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2015;41(3):309-316.
Heydecke G, Peters MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(4):380-386.
Awad MA, Marghalani TY. Fabrication of a custom-made ceramic post and core using CAD-CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(2):161-162.
Lee JH. Accelerated techniques for a post and core and a crown restoration with intraoral digital scanners and CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(5):1024-1029.
Hendi AR, Moharrami M, Siadat H, Hajmiragha H, Alikhasi M. The effect of conventional, half-digital, and full-digital fabrication techniques on the retention and apical gap of post and core restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):364.e1-364.e6.
al-Qarni FD. Customized post and cores fabricated with CAD/CAM technology: a literature review. Int J Gen Med. 2022;6(15):4771-4779.
Bittner N, Hill T, Randi A. Evaluation of a one-piece milled zirconia post and core with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(6):369-379.
Moustapha G, AlShwaimi E, Silwadi M, Ounsi H, Ferrari M, Salameh Z. Marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM fiber post and cores. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(1):45-53.
Devices@FDA [Internet]. [cited 2022 Dec 27]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/devicesatfda/index.cfm?start_search=1&q=M3NoYXBl&approval_date_from=&approval_date_to=&sort=approvaldatedesc&pagenum=10
Abduo J, Elseyoufi M. Accuracy of intraoral scanners: a systematic review of influencing factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018;26(3):101-121.
Almalki A, Conejo J, Wünsche A, Anadioti E, Blatz MB. Digital smile design and fabrication of CAD/CAM restorations in a complex esthetic case. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2022;43(10):664-688.
Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, et al. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: a literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(2):109-113.
Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, et al. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(4):304-309.
Şeker E, Ozcelik TB, Rathi N, Yilmaz B. Evaluation of marginal fit of CAD/CAM restorations fabricated through cone beam computerized tomography and laboratory scanner data. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(1):47-51.
Tamam E, Bankoğlu Güngör M, Karakoca Nemli S, Bilecenoğlu B, Ocak M. Effect of different preparation finishing procedures on the marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-produced restorations: a microcomputed tomography evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;130(4):605-610.
Gurpinar B, Tak O. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127(3):430-437.
Nulty AB. A comparison of full arch trueness and precision of nine intra-oral digital scanners and four lab digital scanners. Dent J (Basel). 2021;9(7):75.
Güth JF, Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Keul C. A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1487-1494.
Zeller S, Guichet D, Kontogiorgos E, Nagy WW. Accuracy of three digital workflows for implant abutment and crown fabrication using a digital measuring technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):276-284.
Lerner H, Nagy K, Pranno N, Zarone F, Admakin O, Mangano F. Trueness and precision of 3D-printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2021;113:103792.
Memari Y, Mohajerfar M, Armin A, Kamalian F, Rezayani V, Beyabanaki E. Marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns made by different impression methods: a literature review. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e536-e544.
Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: a systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):545-551.
Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, et al. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: a systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(4):590-597.e3.
Lima FF, Neto CF, Rubo JH, Santos GC, Moraes Coelho Santos MJ. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: influence of preparation design and impression technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(3):396-402.
Rayyan MR, Aldossari RA, Alsadun SF, Hijazy FR. Accuracy of cast posts fabricated by the direct and the indirect techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(3):411-415.
Tsintsadze N, Juloski J, Carrabba M, et al. Effects of scanning technique on in vitro performance of CAD/CAM-fabricated fiber posts. J Oral Sci. 2018;60(2):262-268.
Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, Kotiranta U, Lappalainen R. Accuracy of inlay and onlay restorations based on 3D printing or milling technique - a pilot study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2019;27(2):56-64.
Pitigoi-Aron G, Streacker AB, Schulze KA, Geissberger M. Accuracy of cast posts and cores using a new investigative method. Gen Dent. 2012;60(3):e153-e157.
Chiu A, Chen YW, Hayashi J, Sadr A. Accuracy of CAD/CAM digital impressions with different intraoral scanner parameters. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(4):1157.