Cue predictiveness and uncertainty determine cue representation during visual statistical learning.


Journal

Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1549-5485
Titre abrégé: Learn Mem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9435678

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 04 04 2023
accepted: 12 10 2023
medline: 7 11 2023
pubmed: 6 11 2023
entrez: 3 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study investigated how humans process probabilistic-associated information when encountering varying levels of uncertainty during implicit visual statistical learning. A novel probabilistic cueing validation paradigm was developed to probe the representation of cues with high (75% probability), medium (50%), low (25%), or zero levels of predictiveness in response to preceding targets that appeared with high (75%), medium (50%), or low (25%) transitional probabilities (TPs). Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated a significant negative association between cue probe identification accuracy and cue predictiveness when these cues appeared after high-TP but not medium-TP or low-TP targets, establishing exploration-like cue processing triggered by lower-uncertainty rather than high-uncertainty inputs. Experiment 3 ruled out the confounding factor of probe repetition and extended this finding by demonstrating (1) enhanced representation of low-predictive and zero-predictive but not high-predictive cues across blocks after high-TP targets and (2) enhanced representation of high-predictive but not low-predictive and zero-predictive cues across blocks after low-TP targets for learners who exhibited above-chance awareness of cue-target transition. These results suggest that during implicit statistical learning, input characteristics alter cue-processing mechanisms, such that exploration-like and exploitation-like mechanisms are triggered by lower-uncertainty and higher-uncertainty cue-target sequences, respectively.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37923354
pii: 30/11/282
doi: 10.1101/lm.053777.123
pmc: PMC10631146
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

282-295

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Zhang et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Références

Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jan;63(1):108-35
pubmed: 19544199
Brain Res. 2015 Feb 9;1597:95-107
pubmed: 25475992
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;11(3):482-503
pubmed: 30942536
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1985 Nov;37(4):571-90
pubmed: 4081101
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Aug;51(10):2026-42
pubmed: 23806840
Psychol Res. 2009 Jul;73(4):463-76
pubmed: 19350272
Psychol Res. 2004 Apr;68(2-3):138-54
pubmed: 14685854
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 15;117(37):22760-22770
pubmed: 32859755
Ann Dyslexia. 2018 Jul;68(2):165-179
pubmed: 29907920
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Feb;72(2):346-374
pubmed: 29741452
J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 26;32(39):13389-95
pubmed: 23015429
Psychol Res. 2009 Nov;73(6):817-34
pubmed: 19034498
eNeuro. 2015 Oct 15;2(5):
pubmed: 26473170
Psychol Rev. 1980 Nov;87(6):532-52
pubmed: 7443916
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Feb;59:101190
pubmed: 36549147
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(11):2175-99
pubmed: 25832459
Child Dev. 2013 Jul-Aug;84(4):1137-44
pubmed: 23432603
Conscious Cogn. 2021 Mar;89:103086
pubmed: 33550190
Cognition. 2002 Mar;83(2):B35-42
pubmed: 11869728
J Physiol. 2009 Jun 15;587(Pt 12):2743-51
pubmed: 19525560
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jul;126:368-381
pubmed: 33836212
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Apr;37(2):220-9
pubmed: 21319915
Science. 2020 Aug 28;369(6507):
pubmed: 32855307
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):1-17
pubmed: 25706542
Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):667-77
pubmed: 23558552
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Nov;61(11):1658-68
pubmed: 18942033
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Jan 5;372(1711):
pubmed: 27872374
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(2):143-162
pubmed: 30869934
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;13(7):293-301
pubmed: 19559644
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;11(3):468-481
pubmed: 29630770
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Sep;34(5):1011-26
pubmed: 18763888
Psychol Sci. 2022 Dec;33(12):2059-2072
pubmed: 36219721
J Vis. 2020 Apr 9;20(4):10
pubmed: 32315405
J Neurosci. 2020 May 13;40(20):4010-4020
pubmed: 32284338
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):238-51
pubmed: 19293089
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 May;112:279-299
pubmed: 32018038

Auteurs

Puyuan Zhang (P)

Academic Unit of Human Communication, Development, and Information Sciences, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.

Hui Chen (H)

Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, China xltong@hku.hk chenhui@zju.edu.cn.

Shelley Xiuli Tong (SX)

Academic Unit of Human Communication, Development, and Information Sciences, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China xltong@hku.hk chenhui@zju.edu.cn.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH