Outcomes of Ultrasound or Physical Examination-Indicated Cerclage according to the Degree of Cervical Dilation.


Journal

American journal of perinatology
ISSN: 1098-8785
Titre abrégé: Am J Perinatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8405212

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Dec 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 6 11 2023
medline: 6 11 2023
entrez: 3 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

 Pregnancy outcomes of individuals receiving cervical cerclage when the cervix is dilated are not well known. We sought to examine preterm birth rates after ultrasound or physical examination-indicated cerclage placement according to the degree of cervical dilation.  This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with singleton pregnancies undergoing ultrasound or physical examination-indicated cerclage before 24  Of 147 individuals undergoing ultrasound or physical examination-indicated cerclage, 90/147 (61%) had a closed or 0.5 cm dilated cervix at the time of cerclage placement, 45/147 (31%) had a cervical dilation of 1 to 2.5 cm, and 12/147 (8%) had a cervical dilation of 3 to 4 cm at the time of placement. Individuals with a cervical dilation of 1 to 2.5 cm compared with those who had a closed cervix did not have increased odds of preterm delivery (58 vs. 42%; aOR: 1.95; 95% CI: 0.93-4.07). However, individuals with a cervical dilation of 3 to 4 cm compared with individuals who had a closed cervix had significantly increased odds of preterm delivery (75 vs. 42%; aOR: 4.33; 95% CI: 1.05-17.77).  The rate of preterm birth increases with increasing cervical dilation at the time of cerclage placement. However, individuals who have a cerclage placed when the cervix is 1 to 2.5 cm can achieve an outcome that is not significantly different from those who had a cerclage placed when the cervix is closed. · Time from cerclage placement to delivery decreases as cervical dilation increases.. · Individuals 1 to 2.5 cm dilated at the time of cerclage can achieve a favorable outcome.. · A cervical dilation of ≥3 cm at cerclage placement was associated with extreme prematurity..

Identifiants

pubmed: 37923387
doi: 10.1055/a-2203-3696
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Thieme. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None declared.

Auteurs

Alyssa C Savelli Binsted (ACS)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.

Lea Nehme (L)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.

Alfred Z Abuhamad (AZ)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.

Tetsuya Kawakita (T)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.

Classifications MeSH