The role of optic nerve sheath ultrasonography in increased intracranial pressure: A systematic review and meta analysis.

To review the optimal diagnostic cut-off of ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in the diagnosis of increased intracranial pressure (IICP). A systematic search was conducted of available studies assessing the use of ONSD ultrasonography in patients with suspected IICP. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonographic ONSD was performed using a bivariate model of random effects to summarize pooled sensitivity and specificity. A summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve was plotted. Accuracy measures associated with ONSD cut-off and predefined covariates were investigated with meta-regression. We included 38 studies, comprising a total of 2824 patients. A total of 21 studies used invasive techniques as a reference standard estimation of IICP and meta-analysis revealed a pooled sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.93) and specificity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.80-0.91). Optimal ONSD cut-off values ranged between 4.1 mm and 7.2 mm. Meta-regression analysis showed that ONSD cut-off values of 5.6 to 6.3 mm were associated with higher pooled specificity compared to cut-off values of 4.9 to 5.5 mm (0.93, 95% CI 0.85-0.97 vs. 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.87; p = 0.036). Ultrasonography of ONSD shows a high diagnostic accuracy for IICP, with high pooled sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, larger cut-off values seem to significantly increase specificity without compromising sensitivity, which support their use as optimal ONSD cut-off. The overall high sensitivity of ultrasonographic ONSD suggests its usefulness as a screening tool for IIC, which may provide an estimate of when invasive methods are warranted. ONSD ultrasonography is a fast and cost-effective method with a high diagnostic accuracy to detect IICP. The optimum ONSD cut-off hasn't been established before, but we suggest the 5.6 to 6.3 mm range as the best for the diagnosis of IICP.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest DB has received support for scientific meetings and courses, including travel grants, from Roche and Sanofi, and research grants from the Sumaira Foundation. DAS has received personal fees for AstraZeneca and Organon advisory board participation, travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim, DSMB participation for the SECRET trial (University of British Columbia) and speaking fees from Bayer and Bial outside the submitted work.