Influence of diameter and length on primary stability in various implant site densities-An in vitro study in polyurethane blocks.

dental implants displacement measurements implant site density insertion torque polyurethane blocks resonance frequency analysis

Journal

Clinical implant dentistry and related research
ISSN: 1708-8208
Titre abrégé: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100888977

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 11 10 2023
accepted: 12 10 2023
medline: 6 11 2023
pubmed: 6 11 2023
entrez: 6 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The influence of dental implant length and diameter on primary stability in various bone densities is not well understood. To in vitro study the effect of length and diameter on resonance frequency analysis (RFA), insertion torque (IT) and displacement (DP) measurements of dental implants in different implant site densities. Dental implants of four different diameters (Ø 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 and 5.0 mm) and three different lengths (7, 11 and 15 mm) (Neoss Ltd, Harrogate, UK) were placed in polyurethane blocks of three different densities (Sawbones Europe AB, Malmö, Sweden). The primary stability was assessed by RFA (ISQ) (Osstell, Osstell AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) and insertion torque measurements (IT Implant length, diameter and block density were found to be significant independent predictors of RFA, IT Implant length affects primary stability more than implant diameter in polyurethane blocks of uniform density along the whole length of the tested implants.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The influence of dental implant length and diameter on primary stability in various bone densities is not well understood.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To in vitro study the effect of length and diameter on resonance frequency analysis (RFA), insertion torque (IT) and displacement (DP) measurements of dental implants in different implant site densities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
Dental implants of four different diameters (Ø 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 and 5.0 mm) and three different lengths (7, 11 and 15 mm) (Neoss Ltd, Harrogate, UK) were placed in polyurethane blocks of three different densities (Sawbones Europe AB, Malmö, Sweden). The primary stability was assessed by RFA (ISQ) (Osstell, Osstell AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) and insertion torque measurements (IT
RESULTS RESULTS
Implant length, diameter and block density were found to be significant independent predictors of RFA, IT
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Implant length affects primary stability more than implant diameter in polyurethane blocks of uniform density along the whole length of the tested implants.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37926940
doi: 10.1111/cid.13290
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:527-551.
Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants. A review of the literature. Int J Prosth. 1998;11:408-420.
Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;28:297-303.
Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:261-267.
Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontics. 2000;2008(47):51-66.
Turkyilmaz I. A comparison between insertion torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of torque capacity and primary stability of Brånemark system implants. J Oral Rehab. 2006;33:754-759.
Turkyilmaz I, Tözüm TF, Tumer C, Ozbek EN. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement. J Oral Rehab. 2006;33:881-888.
Turkyilmaz I, Tumer C, Ozbek EN, Tözüm TF. Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34:716-722.
Pagliani L, Motroni A, Nappo A, Sennerby L. Short communication: use of a diagnostic software to predict bone density and implant stability in preoperative CTs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:553-557.
Trisi P, Carlesi T, Colagiovanni M, Perfetti G. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) vs direct in vitro measurement of primary stability (micromotion): effect of bone density and insertion torque. J Osteol Biomater. 2010;1:141-149.
Pagliani L, Sennerby L, Petersson A, Verrocchi D, Volpe S, Andersson P. The relationship between resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and lateral displacement of dental implants: an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:221-227.
Merheb J, Van Assche N, Coucke W, Jacobs R, Naert I, Quirynen M. Relationship between cortical bone thickness or computerized tomography-derived bone density values and implant stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:612-617.
Sennerby L, Meredith N, Petersson A. Osstell measurements. The use of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) for stability assessment of dental implants. In: Ballo A, ed. Implant Dentistry Research Guide, Basic, Translational and Clinical Research. Nova Science Publishers, Inc; 2012:513-538.
Bayarchimeg D, Namgoong H, Kim BK, et al. Evaluation of the correlation between insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants using a block bone test. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2013;43:30-36.
Sennerby L, Pagliani L, Petersson A, Verrocchi D, Volpe S, Andersson P. Two different implant designs and impact of related drilling protocols on primary stability in different bone densities: an in vitro comparison study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30:564-568.
Sugiura T, Yamamoto K, Horita S, Murakami K, Kirita T. Evaluation of primary stability of cylindrical and tapered implants in different bone types by measuring implant displacement: an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2019;10:10471-10476.
Wang TM, Lee MS, Wang JS, Lin LD. The effect of implant design and bone quality on insertion torque, resonance frequency analysis, and insertion energy during implant placement in low or low- to medium-density bone. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28:40-47.
Romero M, Herrero-Climent M, Ríos-Carrasco B, Brizuela A, Romero MM, Gil J. Investigation of the influence of roughness and dental implant design on primary stability via analysis of insertion torque and implant stability quotient: an in vitro study. J Clin Med. 2023;12:4190.
Farronato D, Manfredini M, Stocchero M, Caccia M, Azzi L, Farronato M. Influence of bone quality, drilling protocol, implant diameter/length on primary stability: an in vitro comparative study on insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2020;46(3):182-189.
Comuzzi L, Tumedei M, Covani U, et al. Primary stability assessment of conical implants in under-prepared sites: an in vitro study in low-density polyurethane foams. Appl Sci. 2023;13:6041.
Cricchio G, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. Sinus bone formation and implant survival after sinus membrane elevation and implant placement: a 1- to 6-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1200-1212.
Comuzzi L, Tumedei M, D'Arcangelo C, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. An in vitro analysis on polyurethane foam blocks of the insertion torque (IT) values, removal torque values (RTVs), and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) values in tapered and cylindrical implants. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(17):9238.

Auteurs

Johan Gottlow (J)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Lars Sennerby (L)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH