Non-Operative Approach to Contained Perforated Marginal Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Case Series.

bariatrics gastrointestinal general surgery minimally invasive surgery obesity

Journal

The American surgeon
ISSN: 1555-9823
Titre abrégé: Am Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Nov 2023
Historique:
medline: 6 11 2023
pubmed: 6 11 2023
entrez: 6 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Perforated marginal ulcers (PMUs) are a rare but known complication of bariatric surgery. Management typically involves prompt surgical intervention, but limited data exists on non-operative approaches. This study reviews published data on non-operative management of PMUs and presents a case series of patients who were managed non-operatively. Our hypothesis is that certain patients with signs of perforation can be successfully managed non-operatively with close observation. We completed a systematic review searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov. Ultimately 3 studies described the presentation and non-operative management of 5 patients. Additionally, we prospectively collected data from our institution on all patients who presented between Dec. 2022 and Dec. 2023 with PMUs confirmed on imaging and managed non-operatively. In our literature review, three patients had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), while two had one anastomosis gastric bypass. One patient required surgery two days after admission. Another underwent elective conversion surgery weeks later for a non-healing ulcer. Two received endoscopic interventions. One patient recovered with nil-per-os (NPO) status, and intravenous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. The patients in our case series presented with normal vital signs, an average of 30 months after RYGB, and with CT scan signs of perforation. None of these patients required surgical or endoscopic intervention. In conclusion, while perforated marginal ulcers have traditionally been considered a surgical emergency, some patients can be successfully treated with non-operative management. More research is needed to identify the clinical presentation features, comorbidities, and imaging findings of this group.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Perforated marginal ulcers (PMUs) are a rare but known complication of bariatric surgery. Management typically involves prompt surgical intervention, but limited data exists on non-operative approaches. This study reviews published data on non-operative management of PMUs and presents a case series of patients who were managed non-operatively. Our hypothesis is that certain patients with signs of perforation can be successfully managed non-operatively with close observation.
METHODS METHODS
We completed a systematic review searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov. Ultimately 3 studies described the presentation and non-operative management of 5 patients. Additionally, we prospectively collected data from our institution on all patients who presented between Dec. 2022 and Dec. 2023 with PMUs confirmed on imaging and managed non-operatively.
RESULTS RESULTS
In our literature review, three patients had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), while two had one anastomosis gastric bypass. One patient required surgery two days after admission. Another underwent elective conversion surgery weeks later for a non-healing ulcer. Two received endoscopic interventions. One patient recovered with nil-per-os (NPO) status, and intravenous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. The patients in our case series presented with normal vital signs, an average of 30 months after RYGB, and with CT scan signs of perforation. None of these patients required surgical or endoscopic intervention.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, while perforated marginal ulcers have traditionally been considered a surgical emergency, some patients can be successfully treated with non-operative management. More research is needed to identify the clinical presentation features, comorbidities, and imaging findings of this group.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37927010
doi: 10.1177/00031348231209533
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

31348231209533

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Rand Pope (R)

Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Wayne English (W)

Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Rachel L Walden (RL)

Eskind Biomedical Library, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Emma Bradley (E)

Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Matthew Spann (M)

Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Jessica Ardila-Gatas (J)

Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Joseph Broucek (J)

Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Brandon Williams (B)

Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Jason M Samuels (JM)

Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Classifications MeSH