A mixed methods study protocol to identify research priorities for perioperative medicine in Australia.
anaesthesia
consumer engagement
perioperative medicine
public and patient involvement
research priorities
surgery
Journal
BJA open
ISSN: 2772-6096
Titre abrégé: BJA Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918419157906676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
23
06
2023
accepted:
03
10
2023
medline:
6
11
2023
pubmed:
6
11
2023
entrez:
6
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Clinical research in perioperative medicine requires the perspectives of patients and caregivers to increase its relevance and quality, benefiting both researchers and the community. Identifying these priorities will enable researchers, funders, and governing bodies to efficiently use scarce funding and resources. We aim to identify the top 10 research priorities in perioperative medical research in Australia. A mixed-methods, exploratory-sequential design will be conducted. The study will include five phases. Initially, a published open-ended survey gathered responses from the population (researchers, healthcare workers, and consumers) regarding uncertainties/questions relevant to the population about perioperative medical research. We collected 544 questions and quantitatively analysed and grouped them according to the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine-Core Outcomes Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) endpoints. Using multicriteria decision-making software, workshops combining the population will be conducted to determine the top 10 priorities for perioperative medicine research for the Australian population. Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from the Alfred Health (Australia) Human Research Ethics Committee (ID: 171/19). The findings will be disseminated in peer review publications, conferences, and dissemination across perioperative research networks. The top 10 priorities will be available to inform research funders, grant submissions, guidelines, and the population.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Clinical research in perioperative medicine requires the perspectives of patients and caregivers to increase its relevance and quality, benefiting both researchers and the community. Identifying these priorities will enable researchers, funders, and governing bodies to efficiently use scarce funding and resources. We aim to identify the top 10 research priorities in perioperative medical research in Australia.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A mixed-methods, exploratory-sequential design will be conducted. The study will include five phases. Initially, a published open-ended survey gathered responses from the population (researchers, healthcare workers, and consumers) regarding uncertainties/questions relevant to the population about perioperative medical research. We collected 544 questions and quantitatively analysed and grouped them according to the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine-Core Outcomes Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) endpoints. Using multicriteria decision-making software, workshops combining the population will be conducted to determine the top 10 priorities for perioperative medicine research for the Australian population.
Ethics and dissemination
UNASSIGNED
Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from the Alfred Health (Australia) Human Research Ethics Committee (ID: 171/19). The findings will be disseminated in peer review publications, conferences, and dissemination across perioperative research networks. The top 10 priorities will be available to inform research funders, grant submissions, guidelines, and the population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37927381
doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100235
pii: S2772-6096(23)00114-4
pmc: PMC10624594
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Langues
eng
Pagination
100235Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s).
Références
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 16;5(12):e010006
pubmed: 26674506
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):228-237
pubmed: 31128879
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jul 05;16:929332
pubmed: 35874652
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;67(6):641-654
pubmed: 32157588
Anesth Analg. 2022 Nov 1;135(5):1001-1010
pubmed: 36135337
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 02;8(11):e023427
pubmed: 30798291
Int J Nurs Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):188-94
pubmed: 22435983
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Apr;120(4):705-711
pubmed: 29576111
J R Soc Med. 2003 Dec;96(12):575-6
pubmed: 14645604
Lancet. 2000 Jun 10;355(9220):2037-40
pubmed: 10885355
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jan;100(1):25-29
pubmed: 27473639
Can J Diabetes. 2017 Apr;41(2):156-163
pubmed: 27881298
Paediatr Anaesth. 2023 Feb;33(2):144-153
pubmed: 36178177
Health Expect. 2011 Dec;14(4):439-48
pubmed: 21176014
Br J Anaesth. 2012 May;108(5):723-6
pubmed: 22499744
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jul;121(1):38-44
pubmed: 29935592
Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):1066-1079
pubmed: 29661384
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Oct;17(4):248-51
pubmed: 22814591
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31
pubmed: 23381514
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;121(5):1013-1024
pubmed: 30336845
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Dec;103(4):382-387
pubmed: 31430534
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):500-508
pubmed: 30857606
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):156-65
pubmed: 24411644
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Oct;92(10):2464-2473
pubmed: 35869704
Br J Anaesth. 2016 May;116(5):586-9
pubmed: 27106961
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;67(6):631-635
pubmed: 32157589
Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):86-9
pubmed: 19525005
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 30;7(6):e016743
pubmed: 28667227
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;123(5):664-670
pubmed: 31493848
BMJ Open Qual. 2017 Oct 26;6(2):e000008
pubmed: 29450260
J Nurs Care Qual. 2015 Jul-Sep;30(3):240-6
pubmed: 25479238
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):637-50
pubmed: 22809132