Regional catastrophic health expenditure and health inequality in China.
China
catastrophic health expenditures
health inequality
random effect model
regional differences
unbalanced panel dataset
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
31
03
2023
accepted:
15
09
2023
medline:
7
11
2023
pubmed:
6
11
2023
entrez:
6
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) can trigger illness-caused poverty and compound poverty-caused illness. Our study is the first regional comparative study to analyze CHE trends and health inequality in eastern, central and western China, exploring the differences and disparities across regions to make targeted health policy recommendations. Using data from China's Household Panel Study (CFPS), we selected Shanghai, Henan and Gansu as representative eastern-central-western regional provinces to construct a unique 5-year CHE unbalanced panel dataset. CHE incidence was measured by calculating headcount; CHE intensity was measured by overshoot and CHE inequality was estimated by concentration curves (CC) and the concentration index (CI). A random effect model was employed to analyze the impact of household head socio-economic characteristics, the household socio-economic characteristics and household health utilization on CHE incidence across the three regions. The study found that the incidence and intensity of CHE decreased, but the degree of CHE inequality increased, across all three regions. For all regions, the trend of inequality first decreased and then increased. We also revealed significant differences across the eastern, central and western regions of China in CHE incidence, intensity, inequality and regional differences in the CHE influencing factors. Affected by factors such as the gap between the rich and the poor and the uneven distribution of medical resources, families in the eastern region who were unmarried, use supplementary medical insurance, and had members receiving outpatient treatment were more likely to experience CHE. Families with chronic diseases in the central and western regions were more likely to suffer CHE, and rural families in the western region were more likely to experience CHE. The trends and causes of CHE varied across the different regions, which requires a further tilt of medical resources to the central and western regions; improved prevention and financial support for chronic diseases households; and reform of the insurance reimbursement policy of outpatient medical insurance. On a regional basis, health policy should not only address CHE incidence and intensity, but also its inequality.
Sections du résumé
Background
Catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) can trigger illness-caused poverty and compound poverty-caused illness. Our study is the first regional comparative study to analyze CHE trends and health inequality in eastern, central and western China, exploring the differences and disparities across regions to make targeted health policy recommendations.
Methods
Using data from China's Household Panel Study (CFPS), we selected Shanghai, Henan and Gansu as representative eastern-central-western regional provinces to construct a unique 5-year CHE unbalanced panel dataset. CHE incidence was measured by calculating headcount; CHE intensity was measured by overshoot and CHE inequality was estimated by concentration curves (CC) and the concentration index (CI). A random effect model was employed to analyze the impact of household head socio-economic characteristics, the household socio-economic characteristics and household health utilization on CHE incidence across the three regions.
Results
The study found that the incidence and intensity of CHE decreased, but the degree of CHE inequality increased, across all three regions. For all regions, the trend of inequality first decreased and then increased. We also revealed significant differences across the eastern, central and western regions of China in CHE incidence, intensity, inequality and regional differences in the CHE influencing factors. Affected by factors such as the gap between the rich and the poor and the uneven distribution of medical resources, families in the eastern region who were unmarried, use supplementary medical insurance, and had members receiving outpatient treatment were more likely to experience CHE. Families with chronic diseases in the central and western regions were more likely to suffer CHE, and rural families in the western region were more likely to experience CHE.
Conclusions
The trends and causes of CHE varied across the different regions, which requires a further tilt of medical resources to the central and western regions; improved prevention and financial support for chronic diseases households; and reform of the insurance reimbursement policy of outpatient medical insurance. On a regional basis, health policy should not only address CHE incidence and intensity, but also its inequality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37927884
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1193945
pmc: PMC10624124
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1193945Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Wang, Guo, Qin, Nicholas, Maitland and Liu.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 13;16(24):
pubmed: 31847072
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 9;18(1):844
pubmed: 30413169
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27(7):613-23
pubmed: 22279081
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 29;21(1):526
pubmed: 34051762
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40811
pubmed: 22815828
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Sep 1;90(9):664-71
pubmed: 22984311
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Sep 01;96(9):599-609
pubmed: 30262941
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 25;22(1):151
pubmed: 35614385
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Jan 01;96(1):18-28
pubmed: 29403097
Int Health. 2022 Jan 19;14(1):84-96
pubmed: 33823538
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 03;15:256
pubmed: 26138738
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Jul;26(4):349-56
pubmed: 20974750
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 May;19(4):521-532
pubmed: 28555372
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jul 1;16(1):27
pubmed: 28666448
Cien Saude Colet. 2022 Jan;27(1):325-334
pubmed: 35043911
Trop Med Int Health. 2020 Feb;25(2):236-247
pubmed: 31713972
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 May 11;15:969-981
pubmed: 35592442
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 May 17;18(1):70
pubmed: 37198358
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(4):866-76
pubmed: 16139936
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 28;16(23):
pubmed: 31795178
Gac Sanit. 2020 Jul - Aug;34(4):370-376
pubmed: 30704817
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Mar 9;12(1):19
pubmed: 35266107
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Apr;22(3):463-471
pubmed: 33582893
Health Econ. 2003 Nov;12(11):921-34
pubmed: 14601155
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;96:258-63
pubmed: 23246399
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 05;6(7):e010992
pubmed: 27381206
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Feb;6(2):e180-e192
pubmed: 29248366
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 07;10:738146
pubmed: 35198521
F1000Res. 2022 Feb 3;11:141
pubmed: 35464045
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Aug;85(8):600-6
pubmed: 17768518
Front Public Health. 2023 May 09;11:1146914
pubmed: 37228711
Chin J Sociol. 2015 Dec;1(4):471-484
pubmed: 29854418
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Apr 28;2(4):175-80
pubmed: 24847483