A

Anterior instability Arthroscopic repair Bankart repair Glenoid bone loss Subscapularis augmentation

Journal

Journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0972-978X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101233220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 20 09 2023
accepted: 08 10 2023
pmc-release: 01 12 2024
medline: 6 11 2023
pubmed: 6 11 2023
entrez: 6 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Introduction- Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) is a novel arthroscopic technique of tenodesis of upper 1/3rd fibers of subscapularis tendon to capsulo-labral repair of Bankart lesion. Treatment of Bony Bankart lesion with glenoid bone loss % (GBL%) 10%-20 % is still a grey zone where bone augmentation procedures are an overtreatment and capsulo-labral repair is associated with high recurrence. A retrospective study of 30 patients with h/o anterior instability with GBL%<20 % were classified into two groups. SB group included patients managed with arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation while CB group included patients managed with arthroscopic capsulo-labral repair. These patients were followed up after a minimum of 24 months post-surgery and functional outcomes evaluated using WOSI, ASES and ROWE scores. Patients in the SB group showed superior functional outcomes for WOSI and ROWE scores. Considering postoperative shoulder pain, the median ROWE-P (pain) score was better for SB group (10/10) when compared to CB group (5/10). Patients under SB group were more comfortable with physical symptoms of their shoulder (WOSI-P average 60/1000) and were more likely to continue their recreational sports activity (WOSI- sports for SB 63.7 and CB 119.5. In our study, none of the 15 SB patients had any restriction in range of shoulder movements [ROWE-M score of 10]. Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair is associated with minimal restriction of shoulder range, better pain relief, better acceptability and smoother return to daily living and occupation and can be considered as a routine for every patient with GBL<20 %.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37928049
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.005
pii: S0972-978X(23)00232-5
pmc: PMC10622588
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1-6

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Références

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jun;25(6):898-906
pubmed: 26613984
Arthroscopy. 2000 Oct;16(7):677-94
pubmed: 11027751
Musculoskelet Surg. 2017 Apr;101(1):75-83
pubmed: 28004306
Arthrosc Tech. 2013 Aug 22;2(3):e303-10
pubmed: 24266004
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972 Aug;54(3):476-83
pubmed: 5053891
Arthroscopy. 2017 May;33(5):902-909
pubmed: 27876488
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Jun;23(6):814-20
pubmed: 24295834
Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Feb;11(1):17-25
pubmed: 30719094

Auteurs

Vinay Samant (V)

Department of Orthopaedics, H.B.T. Medical College, R.N. Cooper Hospital, India.
Seth G.S. Medical College, King Edward Memorial Hospital Mumbai, India.

Roshan Wade (R)

Department of Orthopaedics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Indian Arthroscopy Society. (IAS), India.
Arthroscopy Academy Mumbai (AA), India.
WIFA, IMMA, IFL, SAI, India.

Classifications MeSH