How do search systems impact systematic searching? A qualitative study.
Systematic reviews
bibliographic databases
expert searching
information retrieval
librarians
qualitative research
search engine
thematic analysis
usability
user experience
Journal
Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
ISSN: 1558-9439
Titre abrégé: J Med Libr Assoc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101132728
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Oct 2023
02 Oct 2023
Historique:
medline:
7
11
2023
pubmed:
6
11
2023
entrez:
6
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis projects require systematic search methods. Search systems require several essential attributes to support systematic searching; however, many systems used in evidence synthesis fail to meet one or more of these requirements. I undertook a qualitative study to examine the effects of these limitations on systematic searching and how searchers select information sources for evidence synthesis projects. Qualitative data were collected from interviews with twelve systematic searchers. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. I used thematic analysis to identify two key themes relating to search systems: systems shape search processes, and systematic searching occurs within the information market. Many systems required for systematic reviews, in particular sources of unpublished studies, are not designed for systematic searching. Participants described various workarounds for the limitations they encounter in these systems. Economic factors influence searchers' selection of sources to search, as well as the degree to which vendors prioritize these users. Interviews with systematic searchers suggest priorities for improving search systems, and barriers to improvement that must be overcome. Vendors must understand the unique requirements of systematic searching and recognize systematic searchers as a distinct group of users. Better interfaces and improved functionality will result in more efficient evidence synthesis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37928121
doi: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1647
pii: jmla.2023.1647
pmc: PMC10621724
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
774-782Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Andy Hickner.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The author performs occasional paid part-time consulting work for Wolters Kluwer Health.
Références
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Mar;12(2):136-147
pubmed: 33031639
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Mar;11(2):181-217
pubmed: 31614060
Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2014;9(3):28-50
pubmed: 25914722
J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Jul;101(3):227-9
pubmed: 23930096
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jul 25;20(1):200
pubmed: 32711471
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Mar;10(1):72-82
pubmed: 30561081
BMJ. 2022 Apr 26;377:e068791
pubmed: 35473822
Health Info Libr J. 2014 Mar;31(1):43-53
pubmed: 24751228
Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 20;8(1):145
pubmed: 31221212
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):531-541
pubmed: 30271302
Health Info Libr J. 2015 Mar;32(1):5-22
pubmed: 25407739
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Apr;108(2):195-207
pubmed: 32256231
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Apr;106(2):198-207
pubmed: 29632442
Res Synth Methods. 2014 Sep;5(3):221-34
pubmed: 26052848