Therapist use of cognitive behavior therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing components for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in practice settings.
CBT
EMDR
PTSD
implementation
translation
traumatic
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
03
02
2023
accepted:
03
10
2023
medline:
6
11
2023
pubmed:
6
11
2023
entrez:
6
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Treatment practice guidelines for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recommend both Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) and Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT); however, implementation in practice setting remains challenging. Here we aim to foster implementation efforts for PTSD by identifying the relative use of the various components of empirically supported treatments by therapists and the characteristics that predict their use. Surveyed 346 therapists (84.07% female) of whom 272 participants (78.61%) were trained primarily in CBT and 135 participants (39.02%) were trained in primarily in EMDR. Assessed relative use of various EMDR and CBT components as well as several training and personality factors. Psychoeducation about trauma was the most common element used. "Off label" use of components was also identified with application of EMDR techniques to other diagnoses. Findings also suggest underutilization of Results identify trends in empirically supported component use and therapist characteristics that are associated with the use of various techniques for PTSD. The findings suggest implementation efforts could foster training in underused techniques, address barriers to their utilization and develop knowledge of effective packages of components.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37928599
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158344
pmc: PMC10621788
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1158344Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Neill, Zarling and Weems.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Ment Health Serv Res. 2005 Mar;7(1):5-20
pubmed: 15832690
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 May;60(5):677-81
pubmed: 19411357
J Anxiety Disord. 2019 Dec;68:102154
pubmed: 31733566
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2018 Jun 11;11(4):457-472
pubmed: 32318168
J Anxiety Disord. 2013 Dec;27(8):781-7
pubmed: 24210013
Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):970-979
pubmed: 30847978
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Mar;66:1-7
pubmed: 25614972
J Trauma Stress. 2020 Feb;33(1):116-125
pubmed: 32061111
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998 Feb;66(1):19-36
pubmed: 9489260
Behav Res Ther. 2004 Mar;42(3):277-92
pubmed: 14975770
Clin Psychol (New York). 2010 Mar;17(1):1-30
pubmed: 20877441
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Jun;77(3):566-79
pubmed: 19485596
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Mar;37(1-2):15-26
pubmed: 20177769
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Aug 14;6:28186
pubmed: 26290178
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2005 Apr;14(2):241-54, viii
pubmed: 15694784
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Apr;48(4):312-20
pubmed: 20056195
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;162(2):214-27
pubmed: 15677582
J Anxiety Disord. 2016 May;40:29-36
pubmed: 27085463
J Anxiety Disord. 2013 Dec;27(8):754-62
pubmed: 23538148
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2015;11:139-63
pubmed: 25822345
Psychol Trauma. 2011 Sep 1;3(3):300-308
pubmed: 21984956
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Jan;41(1):126-39
pubmed: 23124275
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009 Jan;36(1):37-49
pubmed: 18568396
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Jun;30(4):448-66
pubmed: 20304542
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Feb;77:129-37
pubmed: 26752326
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;74(3):270-281
pubmed: 28055082
Am Psychol. 2006 Oct;61(7):671-89
pubmed: 17032068
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Jul;85(7):664-675
pubmed: 28471210