Development of novel waxy bone haemostatic agents composed of biodegradable polymers with osteogenic-enhancing peptides in rabbit models.
Biodegradable polymer
Bleeding
Bone wax
Haemostatic agents
Peptides
Sternum
Journal
Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
ISSN: 2753-670X
Titre abrégé: Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918540787006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Nov 2023
02 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
08
09
2023
revised:
02
10
2023
accepted:
30
10
2023
medline:
6
11
2023
pubmed:
6
11
2023
entrez:
6
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of bone wax (BW) is controversial for sternal haemostasis because it increases the risk of wound infection and inhibits bone healing. We developed new waxy bone haemostatic agents made from biodegradable polymers containing peptides and evaluated them using rabbit models. We designed 2 types of waxy bone haemostatic agents: peptide wax (PW) and non-peptide wax (NPW), which used poly(ε-caprolactone)-based biodegradable polymers with or without an osteogenesis-enhancing peptide, respectively. Rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups based on treatment with BW, NPW, PW or no treatment. In a tibial defect model, the bleeding amount was measured and bone healing was evaluated by micro-computed tomography over 16 weeks. Bone healing in a median sternotomy model was assessed for 2 weeks using X-ray, micro-computed tomography, histological examination and flexural strength testing. The textures of PW and NPW (n = 12 each) were similar to that of BW and achieved a comparable degree of haemostasis. The crevice area of the sternal fracture line in the BW group was significantly larger than that in other groups (n = 10 each). The PW group demonstrated the strongest sternal flexural strength (n = 10), with complete tibial healing at 16 weeks. No groups exhibited wound infection, including osteomyelitis. Waxy biodegradable haemostatic agents showed satisfactory results in haemostasis and bone healing in rabbit models and may be an effective alternative to BW.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37930044
pii: 7334459
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad170
pmc: PMC10639036
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 17K10729
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.
Références
Eur Spine J. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1:S89-96
pubmed: 15221572
Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Feb;49(2):179-86; discussion 186-7
pubmed: 2306138
Materials (Basel). 2016 Aug 25;9(9):
pubmed: 28773850
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Feb;48(1):1-8
pubmed: 10757149
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003 Mar;14(3):201-9
pubmed: 15348465
J Craniofac Surg. 2006 May;17(3):420-5
pubmed: 16770175
Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2012 Nov 23;13(6):064207
pubmed: 27877534
Biomater Sci. 2021 Jun 4;9(11):3911-3938
pubmed: 33973582
Future Sci OA. 2018 Jul 26;4(8):FSO326
pubmed: 30271614
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jun;28(6):370-5
pubmed: 23948961
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Apr;50(2):87-91
pubmed: 11981708
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Oct;152(4):962-72
pubmed: 27555340
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1659-64
pubmed: 15511452
Molecules. 2021 Jul 29;26(15):
pubmed: 34361740
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar;45(3):476-80
pubmed: 23927995
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2014 Dec;11(4):385-90
pubmed: 26336454
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 May;85(5):1776-80
pubmed: 18442583
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001 Dec;20(6):1168-75
pubmed: 11717023
Surgery. 1957 Oct;42(4):753-61
pubmed: 13467646
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016 Mar 14;2(3):446-453
pubmed: 33429546
Glob Heart. 2018 Dec;13(4):293-303
pubmed: 30245177