Is there a gender gap in clinical neurosciences? A cross-sectional analysis of female participation in academic neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.
Academic neuroscience
Gender disparity
Neurology
Neurosurgery
Psychiatry
Journal
Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
ISSN: 1873-7528
Titre abrégé: Neurosci Biobehav Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7806090
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
20
06
2023
revised:
03
10
2023
accepted:
01
11
2023
pubmed:
7
11
2023
medline:
7
11
2023
entrez:
6
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Gender equality or the lack thereof is a constantly recurring theme. Here, we sought to provide an overview of the status with respect to the participation and leadership of female doctors in clinical neuroscience analyzing different disciplines (neurosurgery, neurology and psychiatry). A total of 1910 articles published in six representative journals (07-12/2020) were reviewed. Of these, 1327 were original research papers, 145 invited publications and 303 letters/comments. Out of a total of 15,080 authors, 4365 (29%) were women. The percentage of female authors was found to differ significantly between the different specialties (19% in neurosurgery, 39% in neurology and 45% in psychiatry). Women were last authors in 9.5% of the papers in neurosurgery, 29% in neurology and 39% in psychiatry Based on these findings, it can be concluded that gender disparity in academic neuroscience is quite conspicuous. Our review seeks to address the reasons behind this phenomenon in the context of new publications as well as various cultural and historical underpinnings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37931690
pii: S0149-7634(23)00427-X
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105458
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105458Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.