Deciphering the True Immunologic Risk in Renal Transplantation in Patients With HIV.

Since 1995, rates of end-stage renal disease have risen dramatically in patients living with HIV infection. However, given the concern for higher rates of acute rejection in this patient population, the immunologic threat posed by HIV infection is a specter clinicians must continually confront. Living donor transplantation may negate this risk; this study aims to assess the benefit of living donor transplantation in this population and to ascertain the immunologic risk faced by patients who are HIV-infected. The 2021 UNOS database was queried, and all HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients since 1987 were identified. Recipients were stratified based on deceased (DDKT) vs living (LDKT) donor status. Overall survival, allograft survival, acute rejection, panel reactive antibody (PRA) percentage, and crossmatch positivity were compared between groups. One thousand two hundred twenty-six patients underwent DDKT, and 304 patients underwent LDKT. Living donor kidney transplantation demonstrated greater overall survival (P = .045) and graft survival (P < .001). However, no difference in acute rejection was noted between the cohorts, and no difference in overall or graft survival was evident based on PRA percentage. Crossmatch positive status did not negatively affect graft survival. Patients with HIV undergoing LDKT fared better than those undergoing DDKT. Nevertheless, patients at higher immunologic risk-elevated PRA% and crossmatch positivity-did not experience graft loss at a higher rate than patients at lower immunologic risk. These results were valid in both DDKT and LDKT cohorts. These findings suggest that infection with HIV does not overtly increase patients' immunologic risk, and concerns surrounding transplantation in this population may be overestimated.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest All the authors declare no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.