Impact of Portraiture Photography on Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
aesthetic rehabilitation
dental photography
digital dentistry
digital orthodontics
orthodontic appliances
orthodontic treatment
portrait photography
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
06
09
2023
accepted:
30
10
2023
medline:
7
11
2023
pubmed:
7
11
2023
entrez:
7
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Due to the clear depiction of facial aesthetics and other craniofacial parameters, portraiture photography (PP) is becoming more and more necessary in modern clinical practice. The studies chosen for this review's inclusion looked at how PP affected the orthodontic treatment and diagnostic procedure on the subjects who were watched in the studies. Studies published within the last decade precisely from 2013 were searched for across major online databases after devising a proper search strategy. Multiple reviewers created a specific data extraction form that was used for the investigation, followed by the evaluation of bias and the variables found in each of the chosen papers. This form was meant for the assessment for various variables encountered in this study. According to the meta-analysis, using PP was related with a statistically significant decrease in the risk of orthodontic treatment and diagnostic modalities, with odds ratios (OR) of 0.52 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of (0.28, 0.96), and a relative risk (RR) of 0.66 with a CI of (0.45, 0.96). In orthodontics, PP is an important tool that offers useful data for diagnosis, treatment planning, and tracking treatment success. To validate the results of studies like ours, a sizable evidence sample is required due to the limited number of trials that have been performed in this area.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37933372
doi: 10.7759/cureus.48054
pmc: PMC10625786
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
e48054Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Alam et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100
pubmed: 19621070
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Mar;27(2):405-9
pubmed: 26872281
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;35(6):1175-89
pubmed: 12687735
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 30;2018:5418592
pubmed: 30151384
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jul;150(1):64-70
pubmed: 27364207
J Dent. 1992 Aug;20(4):235-9
pubmed: 1430514
Int J Comput Dent. 2000 May;3(2):121-32
pubmed: 11351551
J Craniofac Surg. 2008 Nov;19(6):1481-6
pubmed: 19098536
Angle Orthod. 2013 Nov;83(6):1049-58
pubmed: 23597034
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2009 Mar;37(3):173-4
pubmed: 19830981
Br J Orthod. 1999 Dec;26(4):269-72
pubmed: 10592153
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Jan;31(1):64-71
pubmed: 30381885
Prim Dent J. 2016 Nov 1;5(4):38-44
pubmed: 28107132
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009 Mar;33(2):175-84
pubmed: 19089493
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2001 Oct;29(10):752-7
pubmed: 11799670
Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 May-Jun;17(3):282-6
pubmed: 24714003
Korean J Orthod. 2019 Jan;49(1):32-40
pubmed: 30603623
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):55-61
pubmed: 32336025
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Sep-Oct;24(5):587-92
pubmed: 24355960