Predominant right temporal lobe atrophy: Clinical, neuropsychological and structural differences based on amyloid status.

Alzheimer's disease atrophy biomarkers frontotemporal dementia magnetic resonance imaging

Journal

European journal of neurology
ISSN: 1468-1331
Titre abrégé: Eur J Neurol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9506311

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Nov 2023
Historique:
revised: 06 10 2023
received: 31 05 2023
accepted: 17 10 2023
medline: 7 11 2023
pubmed: 7 11 2023
entrez: 7 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Predominant right temporal atrophy is a radiological sign usually associated with frontotemporal dementia but this sign can also be present in Alzheimer's disease. Given the overlap of clinical symptoms between the two conditions, it is important to know which characteristics allow them to be differentiated. To compare clinical, neuropsychological and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of subjects with prominent right anterior temporal atrophy, depending on the status of amyloid biomarkers. Among patients followed in the dementia center of Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, subjects with right anterior temporal atrophy, defined as grade 3 or 4 on the corresponding visual rating scale, were identified. Only subjects with both an MRI scan and amyloid status available were considered. For selected subjects, data were extracted from clinical and neuropsychological records at initial presentation and at last available follow-up. Two raters applied a protocol of eight visual rating scales to compare brain atrophy and white matter hyperintensities. Of 497 subjects, 17 fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 7 amyloid-positive and 10 amyloid-negative. At initial presentation, executive dysfunction and topographical disorientation were more common in amyloid-positive patients. At follow-up, behavioral symptoms, such as social awkwardness and compulsive attitude, were more frequent in the amyloid-negative patients. Amyloid-positive patients presented an overall worse neuropsychological performance, especially in the language and visuospatial domain, and had higher scores on the right anterior cingulate visual rating scale. Patients with predominant right temporal atrophy showed clinical, neuropsychological and radiological differences, depending on the status of amyloid biomarkers.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Predominant right temporal atrophy is a radiological sign usually associated with frontotemporal dementia but this sign can also be present in Alzheimer's disease. Given the overlap of clinical symptoms between the two conditions, it is important to know which characteristics allow them to be differentiated.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To compare clinical, neuropsychological and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of subjects with prominent right anterior temporal atrophy, depending on the status of amyloid biomarkers.
METHODS METHODS
Among patients followed in the dementia center of Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, subjects with right anterior temporal atrophy, defined as grade 3 or 4 on the corresponding visual rating scale, were identified. Only subjects with both an MRI scan and amyloid status available were considered. For selected subjects, data were extracted from clinical and neuropsychological records at initial presentation and at last available follow-up. Two raters applied a protocol of eight visual rating scales to compare brain atrophy and white matter hyperintensities.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 497 subjects, 17 fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 7 amyloid-positive and 10 amyloid-negative. At initial presentation, executive dysfunction and topographical disorientation were more common in amyloid-positive patients. At follow-up, behavioral symptoms, such as social awkwardness and compulsive attitude, were more frequent in the amyloid-negative patients. Amyloid-positive patients presented an overall worse neuropsychological performance, especially in the language and visuospatial domain, and had higher scores on the right anterior cingulate visual rating scale.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Patients with predominant right temporal atrophy showed clinical, neuropsychological and radiological differences, depending on the status of amyloid biomarkers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37933893
doi: 10.1111/ene.16124
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Centro Dino Ferrari
Organisme : EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research
Organisme : Fondazione Gigi e Pupa Ferrari
Organisme : Ministero della Salute
ID : RF-2019-12365333

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.

Références

Chan D, Anderson V, Pijnenburg Y, et al. The clinical profile of right temporal lobe atrophy. Brain. 2009;132(5):1287-1298. doi:10.1093/brain/awp037
Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134(9):2456-2477. doi:10.1093/brain/awr179
Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011;76(11):1006-1014. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6
Thompson SA, Patterson K, Hodges JR. Left/right asymmetry of atrophy in semantic dementia: behavioral-cognitive implications. Neurology. 2003;61(9):1196-1203. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000091868.28557.B8
Ulugut Erkoyun H, Groot C, Heilbron R, et al. A clinical-radiological framework of the right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2020;143(9):2831-2843. doi:10.1093/brain/awaa225
Kamminga J, Kumfor F, Burrell JR, Piguet O, Hodges JR, Irish M. Differentiating between right-lateralised semantic dementia and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia: an examination of clinical characteristics and emotion processing. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86(10):1082-1088. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-309120
Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Vemuri P, et al. The anatomic correlate of prosopagnosia in semantic dementia. Neurology. 2008;71(20):1628-1633. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000334756.18558.92
Veronelli L, Makaretz SJ, Quimby M, Dickerson BC, Collins JA. Geschwind Syndrome in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: neuroanatomical and neuropsychological features over 9 years. Cortex. 2017;94:27-38. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.003
Younes K, Borghesani V, Montembeault M, et al. Right temporal degeneration and socioemotional semantics: semantic behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2022;145(11):4080-4096. doi:10.1093/brain/awac217
Galton CJ, Patterson K, Xuereb JH, Hodges JR. Atypical and typical presentations of Alzheimer's disease: a clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and pathological study of 13 cases. Brain. 2000;123(3):484-498. doi:10.1093/brain/123.3.484
Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al. Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(6):614-629. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0
Blennerhassett R, Lillo P, Halliday GM, Hodges JR, Kril JJ. Distribution of pathology in frontal variant Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;39(1):63-70. doi:10.3233/JAD-131241
Crutch SJ, Schott JM, Rabinovici GD, et al. Consensus classification of posterior cortical atrophy. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(8):870-884. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.01.014
Kim KW, Park S, Jo H, et al. Identifying a subtype of Alzheimer's disease characterised by predominant right focal cortical atrophy. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7256. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64180-4
Gefen T, Gasho K, Rademaker A, et al. Clinically concordant variations of Alzheimer pathology in aphasic versus amnestic dementia. Brain. 2012;135(5):1554-1565. doi:10.1093/brain/aws076
Lam B, Masellis M, Freedman M, Stuss DT, Black SE. Clinical, imaging, and pathological heterogeneity of the Alzheimer's disease syndrome. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013;5(1):1. doi:10.1186/alzrt155
Abbate C, Trimarchi PD, Inglese S, et al. Does the right focal variant of Alzheimer's disease really exist? A literature analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71(2):405-420. doi:10.3233/JAD-190338
Abbate C, Trimarchi PD, Inglese S, et al. Possible clinical anatomical features of right Alzheimer's disease (RAD). Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33(3):669-671. doi:10.1007/s40520-020-01564-6
McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: fourth consensus report of the DLB consortium. Neurology. 2017;89:88-100. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004058
Harper L, Barkhof F, Fox NC, Schott JM. Using visual rating to diagnose dementia: a critical evaluation of MRI atrophy scales. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86(11):1225-1233. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-310090
Fumagalli GG, Basilico P, Arighi A, et al. Distinct patterns of brain atrophy in genetic frontotemporal dementia initiative (GENFI) cohort revealed by visual rating scales. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018;10(1):46. doi:10.1186/s13195-018-0376-9
Kipps CM, Davies RR, Mitchell J, Kril JJ, Halliday GM, Hodges JR. Clinical significance of lobar atrophy in frontotemporal dementia: application of an MRI visual rating scale. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007;23(5):334-342. doi:10.1159/000100973
Arcaro M, Fenoglio C, Serpente M, et al. A novel automated chemiluminescence method for detecting cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-beta 1-42 and 1-40, total tau and phosphorylated-tau: implications for improving diagnostic performance in Alzheimer's disease. Biomedicine. 2022;10(10):2667. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10102667
Sjogren M, Vanderstichele H, Agren H, et al. Tau and Aβ42 in cerebrospinal fluid from healthy adults 21-93 years of age: establishment of reference values. Clin Chem. 2001;47:1776-1781.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Carlesimo GA, Buccione I, Fadda L, et al. Standardizzazione di due test di memoria: Breve Racconto e Figura di Rey. Nuova Riv Neurol. 2002;12(1):1-3.
Novelli G, Papagno C, Capitani E, Laiacona M, Vallar G, Cappa SF. Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale. Taratura su soggetti normali. Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr. 1986;47(4):477-506.
Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. Lea and Febiger; 1983.
Sartori G, Job R. The oyster with four legs: a neuropsychological study of the interaction of visual and semantic information. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1988;5:105-132.
Monaco M, Costa A, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo GA. Forward and backward span for verbal and visuo-spatial data: standardization and normative data from an Italian adult population. Neurol Sci. 2013;34(5):749-754. doi:10.1007/s10072-012-1130-x
Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G, Nocentini U. Batteria per la valutazione del deterioramento mentale (parte II): standardizzazione ed affidabilità diagnostica nell'identificazione di paziente affetti da sindrome demenziale. Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr. 1995;56(4):471-488.
Giovagnoli AR, Del Pesce M, Mascheroni S, Simoncelli M, Laiacona M, Capitani E. Trail making test: normative values from 287 normal adult controls. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1996;17:305-309.
Della Sala S, Laiacona M, Spinnler H, Ubezio C. A cancellation test: its reliability in assessing attentional deficits in Alzheimer's disease. Psychol Med. 1992;22:885-901. doi:10.1017/S0033291700038460
Caffarra P, Gardini S, Zonato F, et al. Italian norms for the Freedman version of the clock drawing test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011;33(9):982-988. doi:10.1080/13803395.2011.589373
Scheltens P, Leys D, Barkhof F, et al. Atrophy of medial temporal lobes on MRI in “probable” Alzheimer's disease and normal ageing: diagnostic value and neuropsychological correlates. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55(10):967-972. doi:10.1136/jnnp.55.10.967
Koedam ELGE, Lehmann M, van der Flier WM, et al. Visual assessment of posterior atrophy development of a MRI rating scale. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(12):2618-2625. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2205-40
Fumagalli GG, Basilico P, Arighi A, et al. Parieto-occipital sulcus widening differentiates posterior cortical atrophy from typical Alzheimer disease. Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102453. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102453
Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149(2):351-356. doi:10.2214/ajr.149.2.351
Wahlund LO, Barkhof F, Fazekas F, et al. A new rating scale for age-related white matter changes applicable to MRI and CT. Stroke. 2001;32(6):1318-1322. doi:10.1161/01.STR.32.6.1318
Rankin KP, Gorno-Tempini ML, Allison SC, et al. Structural anatomy of empathy in neurodegenerative disease. Brain. 2006;129(11):2945-2956. doi:10.1093/brain/awl254
Abbate C, Trimarchi PD, Inglese S, et al. A case of right Alzheimer's disease. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(5):733-737. doi:10.1007/s40520-018-01116-z
Rainville C, Joubert S, Felician O, Chabanne V, Ceccaldi M, Péruch P. Wayfinding in familiar and unfamiliar environments in a case of progressive topographical agnosia. Neurocase. 2005;11(5):297-309. doi:10.1080/13554790591006069
Snowden JS, Thompson JC, Neary D. Knowledge of famous faces and names in semantic dementia. Brain. 2004;127(4):860-872. doi:10.1093/brain/awh099
Edwards-Lee T, Miller BL, Benson DF, et al. The temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 1997;120:1027-1040.
Pleizier CM, van der Vlies AE, Koedam E, et al. Episodic memory and the medial temporal lobe: not all it seems. Evidence from the temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(12):1145-1148. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-302437
Rohrer JD, Boeve BF, Boxer AL, Kumfor F, Pijnenburg Y, Rohrer JD. Advances and controversies in frontotemporal dementia: diagnosis, biomarkers, and therapeutic considerations. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21:258-272.
de Schotten MT, Dell'Acqua F, Forkel SJ, et al. A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(10):1245-1246. doi:10.1038/nn.2905
Joubert S, Felician O, Barbeau E, et al. Impaired configurational processing in a case of progressive prosopagnosia associated with predominant right temporal lobe atrophy. Brain. 2003;126(11):2537-2550. doi:10.1093/brain/awg259

Auteurs

Jacopo Di Napoli (J)

Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Andrea Arighi (A)

Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Giorgio Conte (G)

Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Tiziana Carandini (T)

Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Luca Sacchi (L)

Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Marina Arcaro (M)

Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Chiara Fenoglio (C)

Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Federica Sorrentino (F)

Department of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Matteo Mercurio (M)

Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Anna M Pietroboni (AM)

Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Giulia Giardinieri (G)

Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Fabio Triulzi (F)

Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Daniela Galimberti (D)

Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Elio Scarpini (E)

Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Giorgio G Fumagalli (GG)

Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.

Classifications MeSH