Clinician views on how clinical decision support systems can help diagnose asthma in primary care: a qualitative study.

Asthma clinical decision support systems diagnosis primary care qualitative study

Journal

The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma
ISSN: 1532-4303
Titre abrégé: J Asthma
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8106454

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Nov 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 7 11 2023
medline: 7 11 2023
entrez: 7 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Asthma can be difficult to diagnose in primary care. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) can assist clinicians when making diagnostic decisions, but the perspectives of intended users need to be incorporated into the software if the CDSS is to be clinically useful. Therefore, we aimed to understand health professional views on the value of an asthma diagnosis CDSS and the barriers and facilitators for use in UK primary care. We recruited doctors and nurses working in UK primary care who had experience of assessing respiratory symptoms and diagnosing asthma. Qualitative interviews were used to explore clinicians' experiences of making a diagnosis of asthma and understand views on a CDSS to support asthma diagnosis. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. 16 clinicians (nine doctors, seven nurses) including 13 participants with over 10 years experience, contributed interviews. Participants saw the potential for a CDSS to support asthma diagnosis in primary care by structuring consultations, identifying relevant information from health records, and having visuals to communicate findings to patients. Being evidence based, regularly updated, integrated with software, quick and easy to use were considered important for a CDSS to be successfully implemented. Experienced clinicians were unsure a CDSS would help their routine practice, particularly in straightforward diagnostic scenarios, but thought a CDSS would be useful for trainees or less experienced colleagues. To be adopted into clinical practice, clinicians were clear that a CDSS must be validated, integrated with existing software, and quick and easy to use.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37934476
doi: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2280839
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-9

Auteurs

Luke Daines (L)

Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Eddie Donaghy (E)

Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Anne Canny (A)

Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Victoria Murray (V)

Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Leo Campbell (L)

Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Carol Stonham (C)

NHS Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board, Gloucester, UK.
Primary Care Respiratory Society (PCRS), Knowle, UK.

Andrew Bush (A)

Imperial Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.
Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.

Brian McKinstry (B)

Centre for Population and Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Heather Milne (H)

South East GP Unit, NHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.

David Price (D)

Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK.
Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Aziz Sheikh (A)

Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Hilary Pinnock (H)

Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Classifications MeSH