BRASS: Permutation methods for binary traits in genetic association studies with structured samples.


Journal

PLoS genetics
ISSN: 1553-7404
Titre abrégé: PLoS Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101239074

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 05 03 2023
accepted: 16 10 2023
revised: 17 11 2023
medline: 20 11 2023
pubmed: 7 11 2023
entrez: 7 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In genetic association analysis of complex traits, permutation testing can be a valuable tool for assessing significance when the distribution of the test statistic is unknown or not well-approximated. This commonly arises, e.g, in tests of gene-set, pathway or genome-wide significance, or when the statistic is formed by machine learning or data adaptive methods. Existing applications include eQTL mapping, association testing with rare variants, inclusion of admixed individuals in genetic association analysis, and epistasis detection among many others. For genetic association testing in samples with population structure and/or relatedness, use of naive permutation can lead to inflated type 1 error. To address this in quantitative traits, the MVNpermute method was developed. However, for association mapping of a binary trait, the relationship between the mean and variance makes both naive permutation and the MVNpermute method invalid. We propose BRASS, a permutation method for binary traits, for use in association mapping in structured samples. In addition to modeling structure in the sample, BRASS allows for covariates, ascertainment and simultaneous testing of multiple markers, and it accommodates a wide range of test statistics. In simulation studies, we compare BRASS to other permutation and resampling-based methods in a range of scenarios that include population structure, familial relatedness, ascertainment and phenotype model misspecification. In these settings, we demonstrate the superior control of type 1 error by BRASS compared to the other 6 methods considered. We apply BRASS to assess genome-wide significance for association analyses in domestic dog for elbow dysplasia (ED) and idiopathic epilepsy (IE). For both traits we detect previously identified associations, and in addition, for ED, we detect significant association with a SNP on chromosome 35 that was not detected by previous analyses, demonstrating the potential of the method.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37934792
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011020
pii: PGENETICS-D-23-00252
pmc: PMC10656004
doi:

Substances chimiques

brass 12597-71-6

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1011020

Subventions

Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HG001645
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R29 HG001645
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Mbatchou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Genetica. 1995;96(1-2):3-12
pubmed: 7607457
Genet Epidemiol. 2015 May;39(4):276-93
pubmed: 25810074
Nat Genet. 2020 Aug;52(8):769-777
pubmed: 32601476
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Apr 7;98(4):653-66
pubmed: 27018471
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 11;10(8):e0134720
pubmed: 26261983
Genet Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;32(3):227-34
pubmed: 18300295
PLoS Genet. 2016 May 09;12(5):e1006029
pubmed: 27158822
Genet Epidemiol. 2015 May;39(4):249-58
pubmed: 25758362
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 22;7:10460
pubmed: 26795439
Nat Genet. 2006 Aug;38(8):904-9
pubmed: 16862161
BioData Min. 2016 Apr 06;9:14
pubmed: 27053949
Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2015 Jan 20;84:1.28.1-1.28.9
pubmed: 25599666
Genetics. 2008 Jan;178(1):609-10
pubmed: 18202402
PLoS Genet. 2016 Oct 3;12(10):e1006329
pubmed: 27695091
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan 7;98(1):127-48
pubmed: 26748516
Nat Genet. 2014 Feb;46(2):100-6
pubmed: 24473328
PLoS Genet. 2013 May;9(5):e1003475
pubmed: 23671420
Nat Methods. 2012 May 30;9(6):525-6
pubmed: 22669648
PLoS Genet. 2013;9(7):e1003646
pubmed: 23874236
Nat Genet. 2021 Sep;53(9):1322-1333
pubmed: 34385711
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Apr;70(4):920-34
pubmed: 11880950
Nat Genet. 2021 Feb;53(2):195-204
pubmed: 33462486
Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jul 3;95(1):5-23
pubmed: 24995866
Bioinformatics. 2023 Apr 3;39(4):
pubmed: 36943372
Commun Biol. 2022 Nov 12;5(1):1238
pubmed: 36371468
Genet Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;43(2):166-179
pubmed: 30478944
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Feb 4;98(2):243-55
pubmed: 26833331

Auteurs

Joelle Mbatchou (J)

Regeneron Genetics Center, Tarrytown, New York, United States of America.
Department of Statistics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Mark Abney (M)

Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Mary Sara McPeek (MS)

Department of Statistics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH