Development and validation of a prognostic model of survival for classic heatstroke patients: a multicenter study.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 11 2023
07 11 2023
Historique:
received:
22
07
2023
accepted:
02
11
2023
medline:
9
11
2023
pubmed:
8
11
2023
entrez:
7
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Classic heatstroke (CHS) is a life-threatening illness characterized by extreme hyperthermia, dysfunction of the central nervous system and multiorgan failure. Accurate predictive models are useful in the treatment decision-making process and risk stratification. This study was to develop and externally validate a prediction model of survival for hospitalized patients with CHS. In this retrospective study, we enrolled patients with CHS who were hospitalized from June 2022 to September 2022 at 3 hospitals in Southwest Sichuan (training cohort) and 1 hospital in Central Sichuan (external validation cohort). Prognostic factors were identified utilizing least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis in the training cohort. A predictive model was developed based on identified prognostic factors, and a nomogram was built for visualization. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) and the calibration curve were utilized to assess the prognostic performance of the model in both the training and external validation cohorts. The Kaplan‒Meier method was used to calculate survival rates. A total of 225 patients (median age, 74 [68-80] years) were included. Social isolation, self-care ability, comorbidities, body temperature, heart rate, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), procalcitonin (PCT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and diarrhea were found to have a significant or near-significant association with worse prognosis among hospitalized CHS patients. The AUCs of the model in the training and validation cohorts were 0.994 (95% [CI], 0.975-0.999) and 0.901 (95% [CI], 0.769-0.968), respectively. The model's prediction and actual observation demonstrated strong concordance on the calibration curve regarding 7-day survival probability. According to K‒M survival plots, there were significant differences in survival between the low-risk and high-risk groups in the training and external validation cohorts. We designed and externally validated a prognostic prediction model for CHS. This model has promising predictive performance and could be applied in clinical practice for managing patients with CHS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37935703
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46529-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-46529-7
pmc: PMC10630318
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19265Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 20;346(25):1978-88
pubmed: 12075060
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 20;35(36):4057-4065
pubmed: 28777690
BMJ. 2015 Jan 07;350:g7594
pubmed: 25569120
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;75(4):e13837
pubmed: 33202077
Crit Care. 2022 Dec 17;26(1):391
pubmed: 36528615
Lancet. 2010 Mar 6;375(9717):856-63
pubmed: 20153519
Eur J Neurol. 2009 Jul;16(7):879-82
pubmed: 19453697
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Feb;118(2):389-400
pubmed: 29234915
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Feb;122(2):151-8
pubmed: 24273236
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 28;12(1):4575
pubmed: 34321480
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Oct;46(10):1891-9
pubmed: 24598696
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Oct;80(1):16-24
pubmed: 16523319
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Feb 3;8(1):8
pubmed: 35115565
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Dec;21(6):742-8
pubmed: 21635561
BMJ. 2008 Feb 23;336(7641):425-9
pubmed: 18270239
J Clin Med. 2020 May 06;9(5):
pubmed: 32384601
Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 25;14(1):2152
pubmed: 37185667
Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. 2017 Jul 26;4(8):000695
pubmed: 30755965
PLoS Med. 2008 Aug 5;5(8):e165; discussion e165
pubmed: 18684008
Brain Sci. 2016 Feb 17;6(1):
pubmed: 26901230
Am J Physiol. 1978 Nov;235(5):R228-36
pubmed: 727284
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008 Jun;28(6):1130-6
pubmed: 18388331
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):861-9
pubmed: 25624438
Emerg Med J. 2012 Feb;29(2):113-7
pubmed: 21335580
Front Immunol. 2022 May 13;13:859231
pubmed: 35634298
Maturitas. 2011 Jun;69(2):99-105
pubmed: 21477954
Int J Biometeorol. 2007 Oct;52(1):43-55
pubmed: 17262221
Antioxidants (Basel). 2018 Oct 25;7(11):
pubmed: 30366410
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Aug;34(8):1377-83
pubmed: 18369592
Cancer Res. 1995 Nov 15;55(22):5459-64
pubmed: 7585616
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Nov 12;167(20):2170-6
pubmed: 17698676
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 20;870:161883
pubmed: 36736407
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Mar;44(3):274-82
pubmed: 23415125
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 4;15(3):e0229616
pubmed: 32130237
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 May;109 Suppl 2:185-9
pubmed: 11359685
Environ Int. 2021 Jan;146:106170
pubmed: 33395923
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):589-591
pubmed: 32053295
Gerontology. 2006;52(3):142-53
pubmed: 16645294
World J Emerg Med. 2022;13(5):355-360
pubmed: 36119776
Neuroradiology. 1997 Mar;39(3):195-7
pubmed: 9106293
Acute Med Surg. 2020 Jun 16;7(1):e516
pubmed: 32551124
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 20;380(25):2449-2459
pubmed: 31216400
Environ Int. 2021 Dec;157:106834
pubmed: 34461376
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001 Feb;280(2):H509-21
pubmed: 11158946
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 21;16(6):e0253011
pubmed: 34153053
J Neurotrauma. 2002 Jul;19(7):869-74
pubmed: 12184856