Change of urban park usage as a response to the COVID-19 global pandemic.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 11 2023
07 11 2023
Historique:
received:
11
07
2023
accepted:
04
11
2023
medline:
9
11
2023
pubmed:
8
11
2023
entrez:
7
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Urban parks became critical for maintaining the well-being of urban residents during the COVID-19 global pandemic. To examine the impact of COVID-19 on urban park usage, we selected New York City (NYC) and used SafeGraph mobility data, which was collected from a large sample of mobile phone users, to assess the change in park visits and travel distance to a park based on 1) park type, 2) the income level of the visitor census block group (visitor CBG) and 3) that of the park census block group (park CBG). All analyses were adjusted for the impact of temperature on park visitation, and we focused primarily on visits made by NYC residents. Overall, for the eight most popular park types in NYC, visits dropped by 49.2% from 2019 to 2020. The peak reduction in visits occurred in April 2020. Visits to all park types, excluding Nature Areas, decreased from March to December 2020 as compared to 2019. Parks located in higher-income CBGs tended to have lower reductions in visits, with this pattern being primarily driven by large parks, including Flagship Parks, Community Parks and Nature Areas. All types of parks saw significant decreases in distance traveled to visit them, with the exception of the Jointly Operated Playground, Playground, and Nature Area park types. Visitors originating from lower-income CBGs traveled shorter distances to parks and had less reduction in travel distances compared to those from higher-income CBGs. Furthermore, both before and during the pandemic, people tended to travel a greater distance to parks located in high-income CBGs compared to those in low-income CBGs. Finally, multiple types of parks proved crucial destinations for NYC residents during the pandemic. This included Nature Areas to which the visits remained stable, along with Recreation Field/Courts which had relatively small decreases in visits, especially for lower-income communities. Results from this study can support future park planning by shedding light on the different uses of certain park types before and during a global crisis, when access to these facilities can help alleviate the human well-being consequences of "lockdown" policies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37935778
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46745-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-46745-1
pmc: PMC10630328
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19324Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Land use policy. 2021 Jun;105:105437
pubmed: 35431392
For Policy Econ. 2020 Sep;118:102253
pubmed: 32834768
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 2;12(1):13246
pubmed: 35918495
Urban For Urban Green. 2023 Feb;80:127828
pubmed: 36619347
J Labour Mark Res. 2021;55(1):4
pubmed: 33681696
Urban For Urban Green. 2020 Dec;56:126888
pubmed: 33100944
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(1):303-360
pubmed: 32952308
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 15;118(24):
pubmed: 34049993
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 2;16(11):e0259031
pubmed: 34727103
J Park Recreat Admi. 2013 Winter;31(4):12-22
pubmed: 25006598
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):1972
pubmed: 33479325
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2317-25
pubmed: 23010338
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0249726
pubmed: 33857208
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2403
pubmed: 33510327
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 15;304:114217
pubmed: 34883435
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 17;15(12):e0243344
pubmed: 33332364
Int J Health Geogr. 2013 May 07;12:26
pubmed: 23648048
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 07;11(4):e0153211
pubmed: 27054887
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0128226
pubmed: 26083361
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(5):
pubmed: 36901248
BMJ. 2021 Jun 21;373:n1601
pubmed: 34154989
Urban For Urban Green. 2023 Apr;82:127898
pubmed: 36915824
Sci Rep. 2022 May 10;12(1):7654
pubmed: 35538129
Landsc Urban Plan. 2022 Dec;228:104554
pubmed: 36091471
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 6;11(1):5012
pubmed: 33024096
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 08;8:568287
pubmed: 33134239
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 02;11:1055720
pubmed: 36817904
J Ment Health Clin Psychol. 2021;5(1):19-33
pubmed: 34590080
Sociol Compass. 2014 Sep;8(9):1140-1155
pubmed: 27375773
Urban For Urban Green. 2022 Aug;74:127677
pubmed: 35855473
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251799
pubmed: 34010353
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Apr;17(2):160-71
pubmed: 25824659