Autologous forearm arteriovenous loop vascular access, an option to be considered.

BACKGROUND

Autologous arteriovenous fistula is usually the vascular access of choice for hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Autologous forearm loops with cephalic or basilic vein are an alternative in those cases with a suitable forearm vein but with an unsuitable radial artery; however they are rarely used and there is little reported evidence of their usefulness. Our objective is to report our results on the creation of autogenous forearm loops as vascular access for hemodialysis.

METHODS

We present a prospective cohort study of autogenous forearm loop arteriovenous fistula created between 2010 and 2022, in patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease. Demographic data, surgical details, vein used, follow up to 24 months, maturation, utilization, primary, assisted, and secondary patency estimations with Kaplan-Meier curves, as well as complications during follow-up, were recorded.

RESULTS

During the study period, 22 autologous forearm loops were created, 14 of them with cephalic, and 8 with basilic vein. Most (59%) of the patients were men, 19 were already on dialysis and the rest started during follow-up. Sixteen patients had previous vascular accesses. One patient was lost during follow-up. Six-week maturation rate was 61.9% and utilization rate was 57.1%. 6, 12, and 24 months primary and secondary patencies were 75.4%, 59.2%, 41.5% and 85.0%, 69.5%, 56.9% respectively. In five patients an access-induced distal ischemia was diagnosed, four successfully treated and only one patient lost the access. No cases of infection or other major complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Autologous forearm loops have acceptable maturation (61.9%) and patency rates at follow-up (56.9% 2-years secondary patency). Although rarely used, they are a vascular access alternative that should be considered to preserve the proximal vasculature of the arm for future accesses.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.