Shear bond strength characteristics on surface treatment modalities of CAD-CAM resin polymers.
PEEK
PEKKTON
TRILOR
bond strength
high-performance polymers
Journal
Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
ISSN: 1532-849X
Titre abrégé: J Prosthodont
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Nov 2023
08 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
30
01
2023
accepted:
05
11
2023
pubmed:
9
11
2023
medline:
9
11
2023
entrez:
8
11
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyze the shear bond strength of composite resin to a commercially available high-performance polymer material for fixed, screw-retained full arch restorations. A total of 135 computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing, high-performance polymer (HPP) blocks were cut and obtained from discs (Trilor 95, Harvest Dental, Brea, CA). The samples were 10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm. The specimen surfaces were grouped as untreated (Group A), 50 μm Al2O3 (Group B), 110 μm Al2O3 (Group C), Rocatec (3 M, St. Paul, MN) activated with silica-modified alumina oxide treatment (Group D); and trimmed coarsely with a carbide bur (Group E). Group A samples were used as controls. After surface treatments, the specimens were gently cleansed with oil-free steam and alcohol wipes. Surface conditioning was performed on all physically treated samples. The manufacturer's recommendations were followed for bonding composite resin to the samples with light-cured Visio.link (Bredent, Chesterfield, UK). Cylinders were veneered with composite resins (diameter 5 mm, height 4 mm) and polymerized on the specimen surfaces through plastic tubes. Twenty-seven specimens were used for each testing group and aging tests were performed. The experimental samples were thermocycled. Shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopic tests were performed. Means and standard deviations were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with post-hoc Tukey tests. Statistical analysis revealed that there was a significant difference between the groups (p<0.001). The highest shear bond strengths were achieved for the specimens bonded with Visio.link without physical surface treatments (270.47 MPa). The lowest bond strengths were found for specimen surfaces abraded with 110 μm Al2O3 (117.03 Mpa) CONCLUSIONS: The results of this laboratory study indicated that the specimens used with Visio.link as provided by the manufacturer had the highest shear bond strengths between the composite resin and high-performance polymer test specimens. Modifications of the high-performance polymer surfaces with carbide burs did not change bonding strengths with the composite materials.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Informations de copyright
© 2023 by the American College of Prosthodontists.
Références
Jin HY, Teng MH, Wang ZJ, Li X, Liang JY, Wang WX, et al. Comparative evaluation of BioHPP and titanium as a framework veneered with composite resin for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122:383-388.
Koike M, Fujii H. In vitro assessment of corrosive properties of titanium as a biomaterial. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:540-548.
Guess PC, Att W, Strub JR. Zirconia in fixed implant prosthodontics. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:633-645.
Kanat B, Cömlekoğlu EM, Dündar-Çömlekoğlu M, Hakan Sen B, Ozcan M, Ali Güngör M. Effect of various veneering techniques on mechanical strength of computer-controlled zirconia framework designs. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:445-455.
Limmer B, Sanders AE, Reside G, Cooper LF. Complications and patient-centered outcomes with an implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prosthesis: 1-year results. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:267-275.
Papaspyridakos P, Lal K. Immediate loading of the maxilla with prefabricated interim prosthesis using interactive planning software, and CAD/CAM rehabilitation with definitive zirconia prosthesis: 2-year clinical follow-up. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010;22:223-232
Larsson C, Vult von Steyern P, Nilner K. A prospective study of implant-supported full-arch yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal mandibular fixed dental prostheses: three-year results. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23:364-369.
Carames J, Tovar Suinaga L, Yu YC, Pérez A, Kang M. Clinical advantages and limitations of monolithic zirconia restorations full arch implant supported reconstruction: case series. Int J Dent. 2015;392496.
Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J DentRes. 2014;93:1232-1234.
Wang T, Leu L, Wan J, Lin L. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor quality bone: a numeric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:231-237.
Torcato L, Pellizzer E, Verri F, Falcon-Antenucci R, Santiago J, de Faria Almeida D. Influence of parafunctional loading and prosthetic connection on stress distribution: a 3D finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:644-651.
Nazari V, Ghodsi S, Alikhasi M, Sahebi M, Shamshiri AR. Fracture strength of three-unit implant supported fixed partial dentures with excessive crown height fabricated from different materials. J Dent. 2016;13(6):400-406.
Abduo J, Judge RB. Implications of implant framework misfit: a systematic review of biomechanical sequelae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:608-621.
Jemt T. In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:151-158.
Abduo J. Fit of CAD/CAM implant frameworks: a comprehensive review. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40:758-766.
Jemt T, Hjalmarsson L. In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between “virtual” and “physical” assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:175-182.
Uribarri A, Bilbao-Uriarte E, Segurola A, Ugarte D, Verdugo F. Marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM frameworks in multiple implant-supported restorations: scanning and milling error analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21:1062-1072.
Yilmaz B, Kale E, Johnston WM. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120:65-70.
Akçin ET, Güncü MB, Aktaş G, Aslan Y. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120:715-720.
Zeighami S, Ghodsi S, Sahebi M, Yazarloo S. Comparison of marginal adaptation of different implant-supported metal-free frameworks before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32:361-363.
Vallittu PK. An overview of development and status of fiber-reinforced composites as dental and medical biomaterials. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2018;4:44-55.
Blanch-Martinez N, Arias-Herrera S, Martinez-Gonzalez A. Behavior of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) in prostheses on dental implants. A review. J Clin Exp Dent 2021;13:e520-e526.
Kortam, S, Elsyad M, Awad S, Elhelbawy N. Metal-ceramic and poly ether ketone-composite maxillary fixed prosthesis supported by four implant and opposed by removable distal extension partial dentures: a comparative study of clinical and prosthetic outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022;37:181-189.
Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Irie M, Yoshida Y, et al. Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks. Dent Mater. 2017;33:e124-e135.
Arkoy S, Ulusoy M. Effect of different surface treatments on repair bond strength of CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(18):6314.
Abdou A, Takagaki T, Alghamdi A, Tichy A, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Bonding performance of dispersed filler resin composite CAD/CAM blocks with different surface treatment protocols. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(1):209-219.
Asakawa Y, Takahashi H, Kobayashi M, Iwasaki N. Effect of components and surface treatments of fiber-reinforced composite posts on bond strength to composite resin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;26:23-33.
Costa Dantas MC, do Prado M, Costa VS, Gaiotte MG, Simão RA, Bastian FL. Comparison between the effect of plasma and chemical treatments on fiber post surface. J Endod. 2012;38(2):215-218.
Zhong B, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Chen L, Li D, Tan J. UV irradiation improves the bond strength of resin cement to fiber posts. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(4):455-460.
Stawarczyk B, Taufall S, Roos M, Schmidlin PR, Lümkemann N. Bonding of composite resins to PEEK: the influence of adhesive systems and air-abrasion parameters. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(2):763-771.
Keul C, Liebermann A, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Sener B, Stawarczyk B. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(4):383-392.