Effectiveness of motivational strategies on physical activity behavior and associated outcomes in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

cancer meta-analysis motivational interviewing physical activity systematic review

Journal

Worldviews on evidence-based nursing
ISSN: 1741-6787
Titre abrégé: Worldviews Evid Based Nurs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101185267

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Nov 2023
Historique:
revised: 20 09 2023
received: 03 02 2023
accepted: 06 10 2023
medline: 9 11 2023
pubmed: 9 11 2023
entrez: 8 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Motivational interviewing is a client-centered counseling technique widely applied as a behavior change strategy. It has been adopted to help cancer patients modify health behaviors. The effectiveness of motivational interviewing on physical activity behavior and its associated outcomes in cancer patients is unclear. The aim of this review was to determine the effect of motivational interviewing with other motivational strategies on physical activity behavior and associated outcomes in cancer patients. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, following PRISMA guidelines. Eight English databases were searched from inception to October 2022. The outcomes were evaluated using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with fixed- and random-effects models. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. Eight trials with 450 participants were identified, with sample sizes ranging from 25 to 87. The number of motivational interviewing sessions ranged from one to 12. The types of motivational strategy intervention varied. Apart from motivational interviewing, pedometers were frequently used as a strategy. The quality of the included studies differed, with one out of eight scoring low in the overall risk of bias. Our meta-analysis indicated that motivational interviewing with other motivational strategies significantly promoted the total physical activity level (SMD = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [0.10, 0.58], p = .005; low certainty), but not did not affect other physical and psychosocial outcomes. The combination of motivational interviewing with other motivational strategies was beneficial in increasing the total physical activity level of cancer patients. Motivational interviewing can be a clinical communication skill that healthcare professionals, especially nurses, can acquire to motivate patients to change their behaviors to promote health. Future studies adopting motivational interviewing interventions could consider additional motivational strategies, such as pedometers, to maximize the benefits on physical activity behaviors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Motivational interviewing is a client-centered counseling technique widely applied as a behavior change strategy. It has been adopted to help cancer patients modify health behaviors. The effectiveness of motivational interviewing on physical activity behavior and its associated outcomes in cancer patients is unclear.
AIM OBJECTIVE
The aim of this review was to determine the effect of motivational interviewing with other motivational strategies on physical activity behavior and associated outcomes in cancer patients.
METHODS METHODS
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, following PRISMA guidelines. Eight English databases were searched from inception to October 2022. The outcomes were evaluated using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with fixed- and random-effects models. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eight trials with 450 participants were identified, with sample sizes ranging from 25 to 87. The number of motivational interviewing sessions ranged from one to 12. The types of motivational strategy intervention varied. Apart from motivational interviewing, pedometers were frequently used as a strategy. The quality of the included studies differed, with one out of eight scoring low in the overall risk of bias. Our meta-analysis indicated that motivational interviewing with other motivational strategies significantly promoted the total physical activity level (SMD = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [0.10, 0.58], p = .005; low certainty), but not did not affect other physical and psychosocial outcomes.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The combination of motivational interviewing with other motivational strategies was beneficial in increasing the total physical activity level of cancer patients.
LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION CONCLUSIONS
Motivational interviewing can be a clinical communication skill that healthcare professionals, especially nurses, can acquire to motivate patients to change their behaviors to promote health. Future studies adopting motivational interviewing interventions could consider additional motivational strategies, such as pedometers, to maximize the benefits on physical activity behaviors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37940607
doi: 10.1111/wvn.12691
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Worldviews on Evidence-based Nursing published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Sigma Theta Tau International.

Références

Barili, F., Parolari, A., Kappetein, P. A., & Freemantle, N. (2018). Statistical primer: Heterogeneity, random- or fixed-effects model analyses? Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 27(3), 317-321. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivy163
Bennett, J. A., Lyons, K. S., Winters-Stone, K., Nail, L. M., & Scherer, J. (2007). Motivational interviewing to increase physical activity in long-term cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Nursing Research, 56, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200701000-00003
Burke, B. L., Arkowitz, H., & Menchola, M. (2003). The efficacy of motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 843-861. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.71.5.843
Demark-Wahnefried, W., Aziz, N. M., Rowland, J. H., & Pinto, B. M. (2005). Riding the crest of the teachable moment: Promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(24), 5814-5830. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.01.230
Dennett, A. M., Shields, N., Peiris, C. L., Prendergast, L. A., O'Halloran, P. D., Parente, P., & Taylor, N. F. (2018). Motivational interviewing added to oncology rehabilitation did not improve moderate-intensity physical activity in cancer survivors: A randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy, 64(4), 255-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2018.08.003
Dun, L., Xian-Yi, W., & Xiao-Ying, J. (2020). Effects of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity on cancer-related fatigue in patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Medical Research, 51(2), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2019.12.015
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924-926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad
Hartman, S. J., Nelson, S. H., Myers, E., Natarajan, L., Sears, D. D., Palmer, B. W., Weiner, L. S., Parker, B. A., & Patterson, R. E. (2018). Randomized controlled trial of increasing physical activity on objectively measured and self-reported cognitive functioning among breast cancer survivors: The memory & motion study. Cancer, 124(1), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30987
Herbert, R. D., & Bø, K. (2005). Analysis of quality of interventions in systematic reviews. BMJ, 331(7515), 507-509. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7515.507
Higgins, J. P., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., & Sterne, J. A. (2019). Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (pp. 205-228). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch8
Higgins, J. P., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons.
Jones, L. W., & Alfano, C. M. (2013). Exercise-oncology research: Past, present, and future. Acta Oncologica, 52(2), 195-215. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186x.2012.742564
Lahart, I. M., Metsios, G. S., Nevill, A. M., Kitas, G. D., & Carmichael, A. R. (2016). Randomised controlled trial of a home-based physical activity intervention in breast cancer survivors. BMC Cancer, 16, 234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2258-5
Lai, D. T., Cahill, K., Qin, Y., & Tang, J. L. (2010). Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD006936. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006936.pub2
Lion, A., Backes, A., Duhem, C., Ries, F., Delagardelle, C., Urhausen, A., Vögele, C., Theisen, D., & Malisoux, L. (2020). Motivational interviewing to increase physical activity behavior in cancer patients: A pilot randomized controlled trials. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 19, 1534735420914973. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735420914973
Lynch, B. M., Nguyen, N. H., Moore, M. M., Reeves, M. M., Rosenberg, D. E., Boyle, T., Vallance, J. K., Milton, S., Friedenreich, C. M., & English, D. R. (2019). A randomized controlled trial of a wearable technology-based intervention for increasing moderate to vigorous physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior in breast cancer survivors: The ACTIVATE trial. Cancer, 125(16), 2846-2855. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32143
Miller, W. R. (1983). Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 11(2), 147-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0141347300006583
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2012). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. Guilford Press.
O'Halloran, P. D., Blackstock, F., Shields, N., Holland, A., Iles, R., Kingsley, M., Bernhardt, J., Lannin, N., Morris, M. E., & Taylor, N. F. (2014). Motivational interviewing to increase physical activity in people with chronic health conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 28(12), 1159-1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514536210
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Park, J. H., Lee, D. H., Kim, S. I., Kim, N. K., & Jeon, J. Y. (2020). Moderate to vigorous physical activity participation associated with better quality of life among breast and colorectal cancer survivors in Korea. BMC Cancer, 20, 365. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06819-z
Pudkasam, S., Feehan, J., Talevski, J., Vingrys, K., Polman, R., Chinlumprasert, N., Stojanovska, L., & Apostolopoulos, V. (2021). Motivational strategies to improve adherence to physical activity in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas, 152, 32-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.06.008
Rubak, S., Sandbaek, A., Lauritzen, T., & Christensen, B. (2005). Motivational interviewing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Journal of General Practice, 55(513), 305-312.
Sheppard, V. B., Hicks, J., Makambi, K., Hurtado-de-Mendoza, A., Demark-Wahnefried, W., & Adams-Campbell, L. (2016). The feasibility and acceptability of a diet and exercise trial in overweight and obese black breast cancer survivors: The stepping STONE study. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 46, 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.005
Spencer, J. C., & Wheeler, S. B. (2016). A systematic review of motivational interviewing interventions in cancer patients and survivors. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(7), 1099-1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.02.003
Takemura, N., Chan, S. L., Smith, R., Cheung, D. S. T., & Lin, C. C. (2021). The effects of physical activity on overall survival among advanced cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer, 21, 242. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07988-1
Takemura, N., Cheung, D. S. T., Smith, R., Deng, W., Ho, K. Y., Lin, J., Kwok, J. Y. Y., Lam, T. C., & Lin, C. C. (2020). Effectiveness of aerobic exercise and mind-body exercise in cancer patients with poor sleep quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 53, 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101334
Thompson, D. R., Chair, S. Y., Chan, S. W., Astin, F., Davidson, P. M., & Ski, C. F. (2011). Motivational interviewing: A useful approach to improving cardiovascular health? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20, 1236-1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03558.x
Tsianakas, V., Harris, J., Ream, E., Van Hemelrijck, M., Purushotham, A., Mucci, L., Green, J. S., Fewster, J., & Armes, J. (2017). CanWalk: A feasibility study with embedded randomised controlled trial pilot of a walking intervention for people with recurrent or metastatic cancer. BMJ Open, 7, e013719. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013719

Auteurs

Naomi Takemura (N)

School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.

Mu-Hsing Ho (MH)

School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.

Denise Shuk Ting Cheung (DST)

School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.

Chia-Chin Lin (CC)

School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.
Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Charity Foundation Professor in Nursing, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.

Classifications MeSH