Reliability of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in assessing fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a metanalysis and a metaregression.
Fluid responsiveness
Fluid therapy
Hemodynamic monitoring
Pulse pressure variation
Stroke volume variation
Journal
Critical care (London, England)
ISSN: 1466-609X
Titre abrégé: Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 11 2023
08 11 2023
Historique:
received:
24
07
2023
accepted:
23
10
2023
medline:
10
11
2023
pubmed:
9
11
2023
entrez:
8
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pulse pressure and stroke volume variation (PPV and SVV) have been widely used in surgical patients as predictors of fluid challenge (FC) response. Several factors may affect the reliability of these indices in predicting fluid responsiveness, such as the position of the patient, the use of laparoscopy and the opening of the abdomen or the chest, combined FC characteristics, the tidal volume (Vt) and the type of anesthesia. Systematic review and metanalysis of PPV and SVV use in surgical adult patients. The QUADAS-2 scale was used to assess the risk of bias of included studies. We adopted a metanalysis pooling of aggregate data from 5 subgroups of studies with random effects models using the common-effect inverse variance model. The area under the curve (AUC) of pooled receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curves was reported. A metaregression was performed using FC type, volume, and rate as independent variables. We selected 59 studies enrolling 2,947 patients, with a median of fluid responders of 55% (46-63). The pooled AUC for the PPV was 0.77 (0.73-0.80), with a mean threshold of 10.8 (10.6-11.0). The pooled AUC for the SVV was 0.76 (0.72-0.80), with a mean threshold of 12.1 (11.6-12.7); 19 studies (32.2%) reported the grey zone of PPV or SVV, with a median of 56% (40-62) and 57% (46-83) of patients included, respectively. In the different subgroups, the AUC and the best thresholds ranged from 0.69 and 0.81 and from 6.9 to 11.5% for the PPV, and from 0.73 to 0.79 and 9.9 to 10.8% for the SVV. A high Vt and the choice of colloids positively impacted on PPV performance, especially among patients with closed chest and abdomen, or in prone position. The overall performance of PPV and SVV in operating room in predicting fluid responsiveness is moderate, ranging close to an AUC of 0.80 only some subgroups of surgical patients. The grey zone of these dynamic indices is wide and should be carefully considered during the assessment of fluid responsiveness. A high Vt and the choice of colloids for the FC are factors potentially influencing PPV reliability. PROSPERO (CRD42022379120), December 2022. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=379120.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Pulse pressure and stroke volume variation (PPV and SVV) have been widely used in surgical patients as predictors of fluid challenge (FC) response. Several factors may affect the reliability of these indices in predicting fluid responsiveness, such as the position of the patient, the use of laparoscopy and the opening of the abdomen or the chest, combined FC characteristics, the tidal volume (Vt) and the type of anesthesia.
METHODS
Systematic review and metanalysis of PPV and SVV use in surgical adult patients. The QUADAS-2 scale was used to assess the risk of bias of included studies. We adopted a metanalysis pooling of aggregate data from 5 subgroups of studies with random effects models using the common-effect inverse variance model. The area under the curve (AUC) of pooled receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curves was reported. A metaregression was performed using FC type, volume, and rate as independent variables.
RESULTS
We selected 59 studies enrolling 2,947 patients, with a median of fluid responders of 55% (46-63). The pooled AUC for the PPV was 0.77 (0.73-0.80), with a mean threshold of 10.8 (10.6-11.0). The pooled AUC for the SVV was 0.76 (0.72-0.80), with a mean threshold of 12.1 (11.6-12.7); 19 studies (32.2%) reported the grey zone of PPV or SVV, with a median of 56% (40-62) and 57% (46-83) of patients included, respectively. In the different subgroups, the AUC and the best thresholds ranged from 0.69 and 0.81 and from 6.9 to 11.5% for the PPV, and from 0.73 to 0.79 and 9.9 to 10.8% for the SVV. A high Vt and the choice of colloids positively impacted on PPV performance, especially among patients with closed chest and abdomen, or in prone position.
CONCLUSION
The overall performance of PPV and SVV in operating room in predicting fluid responsiveness is moderate, ranging close to an AUC of 0.80 only some subgroups of surgical patients. The grey zone of these dynamic indices is wide and should be carefully considered during the assessment of fluid responsiveness. A high Vt and the choice of colloids for the FC are factors potentially influencing PPV reliability.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42022379120), December 2022. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=379120.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37940953
doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04706-0
pii: 10.1186/s13054-023-04706-0
pmc: PMC10631038
doi:
Substances chimiques
Colloids
0
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
431Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Thiele RH, Raghunathan K, Brudney CS, Lobo DN, Martin D, Senagore A, Cannesson M, Gan TJ, Mythen MM, Shaw AD, Miller TE. Perioperative quality initiative IW: American society for enhanced recovery (aser) and perioperative quality initiative (poqi) joint consensus statement on perioperative fluid management within an enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery. Perioper Med. 2016;5:24.
doi: 10.1186/s13741-016-0049-9
Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, Cox BP, Fearon KC, Feldman LS, Gan TJ, Kennedy RH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Miller T, Radtke FF, Ruiz Garces T, Schricker T, Scott MJ, Thacker JK, Ytrebo LM, Carli F. Enhanced recovery after surgery (eras) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60:289–334.
pubmed: 26514824
doi: 10.1111/aas.12651
Makaryus R, Miller TE, Gan TJ. Current concepts of fluid management in enhanced recovery pathways. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120:376–83.
pubmed: 29406186
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.011
Navarro LH, Bloomstone JA, Auler JO Jr, Cannesson M, Rocca GD, Gan TJ, Kinsky M, Magder S, Miller TE, Mythen M, Perel A, Reuter DA, Pinsky MR, Kramer GC. Perioperative fluid therapy: a statement from the international fluid optimization group. Perioper Med. 2015;4:3.
doi: 10.1186/s13741-015-0014-z
Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A, Conte B, Mahjoub Y, Desebbe O, Pottecher J, Lakhal K, Benzekri-Lefevre D, Molinari N, Boulain T, Lefrant JY, Muller L, AzuRea G. Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach. Crit Care. 2014;18:587.
pubmed: 25658489
pmcid: 4240833
doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0587-9
Mahjoub Y, Lejeune V, Muller L, Perbet S, Zieleskiewicz L, Bart F, Veber B, Paugam-Burtz C, Jaber S, Ayham A, Zogheib E, Lasocki S, Vieillard-Baron A, Quintard H, Joannes-Boyau O, Plantefeve G, Montravers P, Duperret S, Lakhdari M, Ammenouche N, Lorne E, Slama M, Dupont H. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:681–5.
pubmed: 24374504
doi: 10.1093/bja/aet442
De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:517–23.
pubmed: 15754196
doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2586-4
Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a “gray zone” approach. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:231–41.
pubmed: 21705869
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318225b80a
Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, Pascal J, Eurin M, Neuschwander A, Marret E, Beaussier M, Gutton C, Lefrant JY, Allaouchiche B. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Eng J Med. 2013;369(5):428–37.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301082
Eikermann M, Kurth T. Apply protective mechanical ventilation in the operating room in an individualized approach to perioperative respiratory care. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:12–4.
pubmed: 25978325
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000707
Messina A, Pelaia C, Bruni A, Garofalo E, Bonicolini E, Longhini F, Dellara E, Saderi L, Romagnoli S, Sotgiu G, Cecconi M, Navalesi P. Fluid challenge during anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2018;127:1353–64.
pubmed: 30300177
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003834
Messina A, Sotgiu G, Saderi L, Cammarota G, Capuano L, Colombo D, Bennett V, Payen D, Navalesi P, Cecconi M. Does the definition of fluid responsiveness affect passive leg raising reliability? A methodological ancillary analysis from a multicentric study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021;88(4):272–81.
pubmed: 34709017
Messina A, Palandri C, De Rosa S, Danzi V, Bonaldi E, Montagnini C, Baino S, Villa F, Sala F, Zito P, Negri K, Della Corte F, Cammarota G, Saderi L, Sotgiu G, Monge Garcia MI, Cecconi M. Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge with 4 ml kg(− 1) over 10 or 20 min: a multicenter cross-over randomized clinical trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022;36:1193–203.
pubmed: 34494204
doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00756-3
Barthelemy R, Kindermans M, Delval P, Collet M, Gaugain S, Cecconi M, Mebazaa A, Chousterman BG. Accuracy of cumulative volumes of fluid challenge to assess fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure: a pharmacodynamic approach. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128:236–43.
pubmed: 34895718
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.049
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM. Group Q–Quadas-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–36.
pubmed: 22007046
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
Messina A, Dell’Anna A, Baggiani M, Torrini F, Maresca GM, Bennett V, Saderi L, Sotgiu G, Antonelli M, Cecconi M. Functional hemodynamic tests: a systematic review and a metanalysis on the reliability of the end-expiratory occlusion test and of the mini-fluid challenge in predicting fluid responsiveness. Crit Care. 2019;23:264.
pubmed: 31358025
pmcid: 6664788
doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2545-z
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.
pubmed: 12111919
doi: 10.1002/sim.1186
de Courson H, Chauvet J, Le Gall L, Georges D, Boyer P, Verchere E, Nouette-Gaulain K, Biais M. Utility of changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide after volume expansion to assess fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a prospective observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:672–9.
pubmed: 32863016
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.07.018
Bubenek-Turconi SI, Hendy A, Baila S, Dragan A, Chioncel O, Valeanu L, Morosanu B, Iliescu VA. The value of a superior vena cava collapsibility index measured with a miniaturized transoesophageal monoplane continuous echocardiography probe to predict fluid responsiveness compared to stroke volume variations in open major vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020;34:491–9.
pubmed: 31278544
doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00346-4
Joosten A, Boudart C, Vincent JL, Vanden Eynden F, Barvais L, Van Obbergh L, Rinehart J, Desebbe O. Ability of a new smartphone pulse pressure variation and cardiac output application to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2019;128:1145–51.
pubmed: 31094781
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003652
Biais M, de Courson H, Lanchon R, Pereira B, Bardonneau G, Griton M, Sesay M, Nouette-Gaulain K. Mini-fluid challenge of 100 ml of crystalloid predicts fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesthesiology. 2017;127:450–6.
pubmed: 28640019
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001753
Biais M, Lanchon R, Sesay M, Le Gall L, Pereira B, Futier E, Nouette-Gaulain K. Changes in stroke volume induced by lung recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients in the operating room. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:260–7.
pubmed: 27922547
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001459
Shen J, Dai S, Tao X, Chen X, Xu L. Corrected flow time and respirophasic variation in blood flow peak velocity of radial artery predict fluid responsiveness in gynecological surgical patients with mechanical ventilation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22:299.
pubmed: 36123625
pmcid: 9484168
doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01837-9
Nordstrom J, Hallsjo-Sander C, Shore R, Bjorne H. Stroke volume optimization in elective bowel surgery: a comparison between pulse power wave analysis (lidcorapid) and oesophageal doppler (cardioq). Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:374–80.
pubmed: 23171725
doi: 10.1093/bja/aes399
Messina A, Montagnini C, Cammarota G, De Rosa S, Giuliani F, Muratore L, Della Corte F, Navalesi P, Cecconi M. Tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019;36:583–91.
pubmed: 31021879
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000998
Biais M, Larghi M, Henriot J, de Courson H, Sesay M, Nouette-Gaulain K. End-expiratory occlusion test predicts fluid responsiveness in patients with protective ventilation in the operating room. Anesth Analg. 2017;125:1889–95.
pubmed: 28742783
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002322
De Broca B, Garnier J, Fischer MO, Archange T, Marc J, Abou-Arab O, Dupont H, Lorne E, Guinot PG. Stroke volume changes induced by a recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in patients with protective ventilation in the operating theater. Medicine. 2016;95:e4259.
pubmed: 27428237
pmcid: 4956831
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004259
Kimura A, Suehiro K, Juri T, Tanaka K, Mori T. Changes in corrected carotid flow time induced by recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing general anesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022;36:1069–77.
pubmed: 34191254
doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00736-7
Messina A, Lionetti G, Foti L, Bellotti E, Marcomini N, Cammarota G, Bennett V, Saderi L, Sotgiu G, Della Corte F, Protti A, Monge Garcia MI, Romagnoli S, Cecconi M. Mini fluid challenge and end-expiratory occlusion test to assess fluid responsiveness in the operating room (maneuver study): a multicentre cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021;38:422–31.
pubmed: 33399372
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001406
Weil G, Motamed C, Eghiaian A, Monnet X, Suria S. Comparison of proaqt/pulsioflex. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019;38:153–9.
pubmed: 29679768
doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.03.011
Weil G, Motamed C, Monnet X, Eghiaian A, Le Maho AL. End-expiratory occlusion test to predict fluid responsiveness is not suitable for laparotomic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:151–8.
pubmed: 31846441
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004205
Kimura A, Suehiro K, Juri T, Fujimoto Y, Yoshida H, Tanaka K, Mori T, Nishikawa K. Hemodynamic changes via the lung recruitment maneuver can predict fluid responsiveness in stroke volume and arterial pressure during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2021;133:44–52.
pubmed: 33687175
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005375
Jun JH, Chung RK, Baik HJ, Chung MH, Hyeon JS, Lee YG, Park SH. The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19:142.
pmcid: 6686427
doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0807-6
Zlicar M, Novak-Jankovic V, Blagus R, Cecconi M. Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018;32:825–32.
pubmed: 29149433
doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0081-4
Kim DH, Shin S, Kim JY, Kim SH, Jo M, Choi YS. Pulse pressure variation and pleth variability index as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:1175–83.
pubmed: 30013353
pmcid: 6038863
doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S170395
Lee CT, Lee TS, Chiu CT, Teng HC, Cheng HL, Wu CY. Mini-fluid challenge test predicts stroke volume and arterial pressure fluid responsiveness during spine surgery in prone position: a stard-compliant diagnostic accuracy study. Medicine. 2020;99:e19031.
pubmed: 32028416
pmcid: 7015642
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019031
Guinot PG, de Broca B, Bernard E, Abou Arab O, Lorne E, Dupont H. Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:660–4.
pubmed: 24366723
doi: 10.1093/bja/aet430
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2642–7.
pubmed: 19602972
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da
Zhang Z, Lu B, Sheng X, Jin N. Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Anesth. 2011;25:904–16.
doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1217-1
Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, Prasser C, Moritz S, Graf BM, Wiesenack C. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:555–61.
pubmed: 20035228
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328335fbd1
Aya HD, Ster IC, Fletcher N, Grounds RM, Rhodes A, Cecconi M. Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:880–91.
pubmed: 26683506
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001517
Messina A, Calabro L, Pugliese L, Lulja A, Sopuch A, Rosalba D, Morenghi E, Hernandez G, Monnet X, Cecconi M. Fluid challenge in critically ill patients receiving haemodynamic monitoring: a systematic review and comparison of two decades. Crit Care. 2022;26:186.
pubmed: 35729632
pmcid: 9210670
doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04056-3
Hofer CK, Müller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest. 2005;128:848–54.
pubmed: 16100177
doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.848
Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the respiratory systolic variation test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:746–55.
pubmed: 16286349
doi: 10.1093/bja/aei262
Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, Desebbe O, Joseph P, Metton O, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:1105–11.
pubmed: 17525584
doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267593.72744.20
Lee JH, Kim JT, Yoon SZ, Lim YJ, Jeon Y, Bahk JH, Kim CS. Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:343–8.
pubmed: 17621598
doi: 10.1093/bja/aem179
Cannesson M, Slieker J, Desebbe O, Bauer C, Chiari P, Henaine R, Lehot JJ. The ability of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of the respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure to monitor fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesthesia Analgesia. 2008;106:1195–200.
pubmed: 18349192
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000297291.01615.5c
Messina A, Romano SM, Bonicolini E, Colombo D, Cammarota G, Chiostri M, Della Corte F, Navalesi P, Payen D, Romagnoli S. Cardiac cycle efficiency and dicrotic pressure variations: new parameters for fluid therapy: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34:755–63.
pubmed: 28722695
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000661
Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, Delannoy B, Robin J, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:200–6.
pubmed: 18522935
doi: 10.1093/bja/aen133
Min JJ, Kim TK, Lee JH, Park J, Cho HS, Kim WS, Lee YT. Evaluation of augmented pulse pressure variation using the valsalva manoeuvre as a predictor of fluid responsiveness under open-chest conditions: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34:254–61.
pubmed: 28207430
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000613
Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, Boucau C, Simon R, Hénaine R, Lehot JJ. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with vigileo/flotrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:513–7.
pubmed: 19151280
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318192a36b
Jeong DM, Ahn HJ, Park HW, Yang M, Kim JA, Park J. Stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation are not useful for predicting fluid responsiveness in thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2017;125:1158–65.
pubmed: 28504996
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002056
Derichard A, Robin E, Tavernier B, Costecalde M, Fleyfel M, Onimus J, Lebuffe G, Chambon JP, Vallet B. Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: evaluation during major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:678–84.
pubmed: 19797246
doi: 10.1093/bja/aep267
Min JJ, Lee JH, Hong KY, Choi SJ. Utility of stroke volume variation measured using non-invasive bioreactance as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in the prone position. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31:397–405.
pubmed: 26964992
doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9859-z
de Waal EE, Rex S, Kruitwagen CL, Kalkman CJ, Buhre WF. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:510–5.
pubmed: 19114886
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181958bf7
Biais M, Bernard O, Ha JC, Degryse C, Sztark F. Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:407–13.
pubmed: 20190260
doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq031
Suehiro K, Okutani R. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:772–5.
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.03.014
Lee JH, Jeon Y, Bahk JH, Gil NS, Hong DM, Kim JH, Kim HJ. Pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation for lung surgery using thoracotomy: randomised controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28:39–44.
pubmed: 21088596
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834089cf
Høiseth L, Hoff IE, Skare O, Kirkebøen KA, Landsverk SA. Photoplethysmographic and pulse pressure variations during abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:1221–30.
pubmed: 22092127
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02527.x
Biais M, Stecken L, Ottolenghi L, Roullet S, Quinart A, Masson F, Sztark F. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with cnap™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:523–8.
pubmed: 21642606
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182240054
Ali A, Abdullah T, Sabanci PA, Dogan L, Orhan-Sungur M, Akinci IO. Comparison of ability of pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in prone and supine position: an observational study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33:573–80.
pubmed: 30117033
doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0195-3
Suehiro K, Okutani R. Influence of tidal volume for stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation. J Anesth. 2011;25:777–80.
pubmed: 21744128
doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1200-x
Vistisen ST, Berg JM, Boekel MF, Modestini M, Bergman R, Jainandunsing JS, Mariani MA, Scheeren TWL. Using extra systoles and the micro-fluid challenge to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33:777–86.
pubmed: 30414054
doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0218-0
Høiseth L, Hoff IE, Myre K, Landsverk SA, Kirkebøen KA. Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:777–86.
pubmed: 22288953
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02641.x
Ali A, Aygun E, Abdullah T, Bolsoy-Deveci S, Orhan-Sungur M, Canbaz M, Ozkan Akinci I. A challenge with 5 cmh2o of positive end-expiratory pressure predicts fluid responsiveness in neurosurgery patients with protective ventilation: an observational study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85:1184–92.
pubmed: 31213047
doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13721-2
Kim KM, Gwak MS, Choi SJ, Kim MH, Park MH, Heo BY. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;65:237–43.
pubmed: 24101958
pmcid: 3790035
doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.3.237
Ali A, Dorman Y, Abdullah T, Yasa C, Orhan-Sungur M, Akinci IO, Ergin-Ozcan P. Ability of mini-fluid challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in obese patients undergoing surgery in the prone position. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85:981–8.
pubmed: 30994311
doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13276-2
Seo H, Kong YG, Jin SJ, Chin JH, Kim HY, Lee YK, Hwang JH, Kim YK. Dynamic arterial elastance in predicting arterial pressure increase after fluid challenge during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective observational study. Medicine. 2015;94:e1794.
pubmed: 26469925
pmcid: 4616778
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001794
Berger K, Francony G, Bouzat P, Halle C, Genty C, Oddoux M, Gay E, Albaladejo P, Payen JF. Prone position affects stroke volume variation performance in predicting fluid responsiveness in neurosurgical patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81:628–35.
pubmed: 25263024
Watanabe R, Suehiro K, Mukai A, Tanaka K, Yamada T, Mori T, Nishikawa K. Changes in stroke volume induced by lung recruitment maneuver can predict fluid responsiveness during intraoperative lung-protective ventilation in prone position. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21:303.
pubmed: 34856928
pmcid: 8638171
doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01527-y
Tusman G, Groisman I, Maidana GA, Scandurra A, Arca JM, Bohm SH, Suarez-Sipmann F. The sensitivity and specificity of pulmonary carbon dioxide elimination for noninvasive assessment of fluid responsiveness. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:1404–11.
pubmed: 26505574
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001047
Montenij LJ, Sonneveld JP, Nierich AP, Buhre WF, de Waal EE. Diagnostic accuracy of stroke volume variation measured with uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis for the prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients with impaired left ventricular function: a prospective, observational study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30:481–6.
pubmed: 26227160
doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9743-2
Flick M, Sand U, Bergholz A, Kouz K, Reiter B, Flotzinger D, Saugel B, Kubitz JC. Right ventricular and pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: an interventional study in coronary artery bypass surgery patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022;36:1817–25.
pubmed: 35233702
doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00830-4