Comparable performance of machine learning algorithms in predicting readmission and complications following total joint arthroplasty with external validation.

Complications Database External validation Machine learning Total joint arthroplasty

Journal

Arthroplasty (London, England)
ISSN: 2524-7948
Titre abrégé: Arthroplasty
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101773073

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 17 07 2023
accepted: 27 08 2023
medline: 9 11 2023
pubmed: 9 11 2023
entrez: 8 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The purpose of the study was to use Machine Learning (ML) to construct a risk calculator for patients who undergo Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) on the basis of New York State Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) data and externally validate the calculator on a single TJA center. Seven ML algorithms, i.e., logistic regression, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting (Xg Boost), random forest (RF) classifier, support vector machine, and single and a five-layered neural network were trained on the derivation cohort. Models were trained on 68% of data, validated on 15%, tested on 15%, and externally validated on 2% of the data from a single arthroplasty center. Validation of the models showed that the RF classifier performed best in terms of 30-d mortality AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic) 0.78, 30-d readmission (AUROC 0.61) and 90-d composite complications (AUROC 0.73) amongst the test set. Additionally, Xg Boost was found to be the best predicting model for 90-d readmission and 90-d composite complications (AUC 0.73). External validation demonstrated that models achieved similar AUROCs to the test set although variation occurred in top model performance for 90-d composite complications and readmissions between our test and external validation set. This was the first study to investigate the use of ML to create a predictive risk calculator from state-wide data and then externally validate it with data from a single arthroplasty center. Discrimination between best performing ML models and between the test set and the external validation set are comparable. III.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The purpose of the study was to use Machine Learning (ML) to construct a risk calculator for patients who undergo Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) on the basis of New York State Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) data and externally validate the calculator on a single TJA center.
METHODS METHODS
Seven ML algorithms, i.e., logistic regression, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting (Xg Boost), random forest (RF) classifier, support vector machine, and single and a five-layered neural network were trained on the derivation cohort. Models were trained on 68% of data, validated on 15%, tested on 15%, and externally validated on 2% of the data from a single arthroplasty center.
RESULTS RESULTS
Validation of the models showed that the RF classifier performed best in terms of 30-d mortality AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic) 0.78, 30-d readmission (AUROC 0.61) and 90-d composite complications (AUROC 0.73) amongst the test set. Additionally, Xg Boost was found to be the best predicting model for 90-d readmission and 90-d composite complications (AUC 0.73). External validation demonstrated that models achieved similar AUROCs to the test set although variation occurred in top model performance for 90-d composite complications and readmissions between our test and external validation set.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This was the first study to investigate the use of ML to create a predictive risk calculator from state-wide data and then externally validate it with data from a single arthroplasty center. Discrimination between best performing ML models and between the test set and the external validation set are comparable.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE METHODS
III.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37941068
doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00208-0
pii: 10.1186/s42836-023-00208-0
pmc: PMC10631030
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

58

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111858
pubmed: 34047790
J Arthroplasty. 2021 May;36(5):1471-1477
pubmed: 33250329
Br J Surg. 2015 Feb;102(3):148-58
pubmed: 25627261
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1267-1279
pubmed: 31094833
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Apr;34(4):632-637
pubmed: 30665831
Future Healthc J. 2019 Jun;6(2):94-98
pubmed: 31363513
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Sep 7;104(17):1586-1594
pubmed: 35383655
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 16;18(12):e323
pubmed: 27986644
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8S):S748-S752
pubmed: 35189295
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2722-2727
pubmed: 29807786
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Nov 01;480(11):2137-2145
pubmed: 35767804
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3353-3363
pubmed: 32600816
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):72-90
pubmed: 34612519
JBJS Rev. 2020 Nov;8(11):e2000073
pubmed: 33186211
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Aug 02;10:135-143
pubmed: 34401416
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):452-460
pubmed: 30624314
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2016;4(3):177-180
pubmed: 29296442
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1581-1584
pubmed: 31171397
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jul;10(7):
pubmed: 28705865
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 May 6;102(9):830-840
pubmed: 32379124
Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 May;35(5):221-225
pubmed: 28471876
J Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;46(9):1134-1140
pubmed: 30988126
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3617-3623
pubmed: 30243882
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2088-2101
pubmed: 32667760
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 22;17(3):e0263897
pubmed: 35316270
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1174-1178
pubmed: 31924490
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3117-3122
pubmed: 32564970
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):23-28
pubmed: 30601252

Auteurs

Hashim J F Shaikh (HJF)

Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA. hashim_shaikh@urmc.rochester.edu.

Mina Botros (M)

Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.

Gabriel Ramirez (G)

Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.

Caroline P Thirukumaran (CP)

Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.

Benjamin Ricciardi (B)

Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.

Thomas G Myers (TG)

Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.

Classifications MeSH