Association of Early Pregnancy Values of Glycosylated Hemoglobin and the Development of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.
gdm
gestational diabetes mellitus
hba1c
high-risk pregnancy
ogtt
oral glucose tolerance test
pregnancy complications
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
accepted:
08
10
2023
medline:
9
11
2023
pubmed:
9
11
2023
entrez:
9
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction There is no consensus regarding screening and diagnostic methods for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The present study aimed to evaluate the association between early pregnancy values of glycosylated hemoglobin and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant women in a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. Methods The prospective cohort study included 200 pregnant women aged between 18 and 35 years in their first trimester (gestational age eight to 13 weeks) attending the antenatal clinics of the study hospital. A glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) test and a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) test were done in all study participants in their first trimester. Pregnant women with HbA1c ≥6.5% and OGTT ≥140 mg/dl were excluded from the study. In other women, the second trimester (24-28 weeks) and the third trimester OGTT (32-34 weeks) were done to detect gestational diabetes mellitus. Data collection was initiated after the approval of the Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) and relevant authorities. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was done to identify the cut-off value of HbA1c that predicted the development of GDM. Results The incidence of GDM was 33% among our study participants. The mean HbA1c was significantly higher among women who had GDM (5.4 ± 0.4%) as compared to those who did not develop GDM (4.9 ± 0.2%) (p<0.001). On ROC analysis of HbA1c values to predict the development of GDM, a cut-off value of HbA1c ≥5.25%, irrespective of risk status, was calculated to have 84.8% sensitivity and 62.7% specificity, and among the high-risk group, HbA1c ≥5.15% had 83.3% sensitivity and 97% specificity in predicting GDM. On stratified analysis, a moderately strong positive correlation was demonstrated between HbA1c values and OGTT in the second trimester in both high-risk and low-risk cohorts (p<0.05). Conclusion Based on the findings of the present study, HbA1c can be proposed to be a suitable biomarker for GDM prediction, probably not independently but rather as a component of a multi-marker approach for high- and low-risk pregnant groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37942393
doi: 10.7759/cureus.46685
pmc: PMC10629576
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e46685Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Singh et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jun;39(6):982-7
pubmed: 27208333
Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Oct 2;17(11):115
pubmed: 28971305
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 16;8(1):12249
pubmed: 30116010
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Nov-Dec;19(6):701-4
pubmed: 26693419
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145(2):158-163
pubmed: 30791100
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;169(4):874-81
pubmed: 8238142
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):QE01-4
pubmed: 27190902
J Diabetes Res. 2021 Apr 9;2021:5537110
pubmed: 33928166
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 15;57(4):
pubmed: 33920937
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;60(5):899-902
pubmed: 34507669
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 27;22(1):71
pubmed: 35086491
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Mar;102(3):294-300
pubmed: 36524557
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Jan;95(1):93-7
pubmed: 26400192
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Nov;42(11):1379-1384
pubmed: 32268994
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S14-S31
pubmed: 31862745
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):32
pubmed: 35031013
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Nov;8(2):
pubmed: 33132213
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010 May;48(5):609-14
pubmed: 20464776
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):406-408
pubmed: 29370044