Evaluating knowledge loss over multiple retention intervals can identify deficiencies and inform curricular development.

gross anatomy education knowledge retention nursing education undergraduate education

Journal

Anatomical sciences education
ISSN: 1935-9780
Titre abrégé: Anat Sci Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101392205

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Nov 2023
Historique:
revised: 19 10 2023
received: 06 07 2023
accepted: 20 10 2023
medline: 9 11 2023
pubmed: 9 11 2023
entrez: 9 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Nursing students struggle to retain enough anatomical knowledge to meet their entry to practice competencies, but what knowledge is missing and when this occurs has been previously unexplored. A cohort of 80 nursing students were given multiple choice quizzes to assess their anatomical knowledge on 11 different organ systems during their second, third, and fourth year. Results were analyzed in comparison to their first-year examination scores to determine knowledge loss. Results showed an overall knowledge loss of 33.5% in the second year, 31.8% in the third year, and 29.6% in the fourth year. There were significant differences in system specific results. Special senses (i.e., audition) had a 20.6% loss in the second year, increased in retention to a 17.3% loss in third year, and then decreased to a 37% loss in fourth year. The vascular system had a 46.1% knowledge loss at the second-year assessment, declined to 49% knowledge loss in the third year, but improved to 27.6% knowledge loss by the fourth year. A similar change was observed for the musculoskeletal system with second-year loss at 30.7%, third-year loss at 40.3%, and fourth-year loss at 26.6%. These data suggest there are significant differences in the amount of knowledge retained by nursing students depending on the system being tested and the year the test is taken. Identifying the areas and times where anatomical knowledge is lost and gained is valuable for instructors in any program so that specific topics can be targeted at different times with more effective educational strategies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37942781
doi: 10.1002/ase.2354
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Anatomical Sciences Education published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for Anatomy.

Références

Alt-Gehrman P. Nursing simulation and transfer of knowledge in undergraduate nursing programs: a literature review. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2019;40:95-98.
Arzi HJ, Ben-Zvi R, Ganiel U. Forgetting versus savings: the many facets of long-term retention. Sci Educ. 1986;70:171-188.
Baashar A, Kumar RS, Akhtar SMI, Alyousif SM, Alhassan AI, Townsi N. Impact of audience response system in enhancing teaching of anatomy and physiology for health sciences students at king Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023;14:421-432.
Baker KG. Twelve tips for optimising medical student retention of anatomy. Med Teach. 2022;44:138-143.
Bloom BS. Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: the cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co. Inc; 1956.
Brunk I, Schauber S, Georg W. Do they know too little? An inter-institutional study on the anatomical knowledge of upper-year medical students based on multiple choice questions of a progress test. Ann Anat. 2017;209:93-100.
Custers EJFM. Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review. Adv Health Sci Educ Pract. 2010;15:109-128.
Custers EJ, Ten Cate OT. Very long-term retention of basic science knowledge in doctors after graduation. Med Educ. 2011;45:422-430.
Dobson JL, Linderholm T. The effect of selected “desirable difficulties” on the ability to recall anatomy information. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8:395-403.
Dobson JL, Perez J, Linderholm T. Distributed retrieval practice promotes superior recall of anatomy information. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10:339-347.
Doomernik DE, Goor van H, Kooloos JGM, ten Broek RP. Longitudinal retention of anatomical knowledge in second-year medical students. Anat Sci Edu. 2017;10:242-248.
Ebbinghaus H. Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. Translated by Ruger HA, Bussenius CE. New York: Psychclassics; 1913.
Gunay U, Kilinc G. The transfer of theoretical knowledge to clinical practice by nursing students and the difficulties they experience: a qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;65:81-86.
Hagan EA, Jaffe BM. Effect of curriculum changes on student performance during general surgical clerkship. J Surg Educ. 2018;75:622-627.
Holda MK, Stefura T, Koziej M, Skomarovska O, Jasinska KA, Salabun W, et al. Alarming decline in recognition of anatomical structures amongst medical students and physicians. Ann Anat. 2019;221:48-56.
Jurjus SA, Lee J, Ahle S, Brown KM, Butera G. Anatomical knowledge retention in third-year medical students prior to obstetrics and gynecology and surgery rotations. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:461-468.
Konuri VK, Siddiqui AU. Advancing anatomy teaching by incorporating the neurophysiological concepts of learning. Natl J Clin Anat. 2021;10:181-183.
Kooloos JGM, Bergman EM, Scheffers MAGP, Schepens FAN, Vorstenbosch MATM. The effect of passive and active education methods applied in repetition activities on the retention of anatomical knowledge. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13:458-466.
Lazarus MD, Chinchilli VM, Leong SL, Kauffman GL Jr. Perceptions of anatomy: critical components in the clinical setting. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5:187-199.
Manyama M, Stafford R, Mazyala E, Lukanima A, Magele N, Kidenya BR, et al. Improving gross anatomy learning using reciprocal peer teaching. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:95-111.
McBride JM, Drake RL. Longitudinal cohort study on medical student retention of anatomical knowledge in an integrated problem-based learning curriculum. Med Teach. 2016;38:1209-1213.
Meyer AJ, Armson A, Losco CD, Losco B, Walker BF. 2015. Factors influencing student performance on the carpal bone test as a preliminary evaluation of anatomical knowledge retention. Anat Sci Educ. 8:133-139.
Narnaware Y, Neumeier M. Second-year nursing students' retention of gross anatomical knowledge. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13:230-236.
NCSBN. NCLEX RN Test Plan National council of stateboards of nursing. 2023. Available from: https://www.ncsbn.org/publications/2023-nclex-rn-test-plan
Vogl W. The state of gross anatomy. UBCMJ. 2017;8(2):4.
Sosa PM, Goncalves R, Carpes FP, Mello-Carpes PB. 2018. Active memory reactivation previous to the introduction of a new related content improves students' learning. Adv Physiol Educ. 42:75-78.
Vorstenbosch MATM, Kooloos JGM, Bolhuis SM, Laan RFJM. An investigation of anatomical competence in junior medical doctors. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9:8-17.
Young JQ, van Dijk SM, O'Sullivan PS, Custers EJ, Irby DM, Cate ten O. Influence of learner knowledge and case complexity on handover accuracy and cognitive load: results from a simulation study. Med Educ. 2016;50:969-978.

Auteurs

Melanie Neumeier (M)

Department of Human Health and Science, Faculty of Nursing, MacEwan University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Yuwaraj Raj Narnaware (YR)

Department of Human Health and Science, Faculty of Nursing, MacEwan University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Classifications MeSH