Progesterone after mifepristone: A pilot prospective single arm clinical trial for women who have changed their mind after commencing medical abortion.
abortion seekers
abortion, induced
abortion, threatened
family planning
mifepristone
pregnancy outcome
reproductive health autonomy
threatened miscarriage
unplanned pregnancy
unwanted pregnancies
Journal
The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
ISSN: 1447-0756
Titre abrégé: J Obstet Gynaecol Res
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9612761
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Nov 2023
09 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
10
08
2023
accepted:
22
10
2023
medline:
10
11
2023
pubmed:
10
11
2023
entrez:
9
11
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This pilot study aimed to assess the utility of an oral progesterone treatment protocol for women who commenced medical abortion and then changed their mind and wished instead to maintain their pregnancy. The Progesterone-After-Mifepristone-pilot for efficacy and reproducibility (PAMper) trial was designed as a prospective single-arm pilot clinical trial, conducted via telehealth. Women aged 18 to 45 years in Australia who reported ingesting mifepristone within the last 72 h to initiate medical abortion and had not taken misoprostol were included. Initial contact was by a web-based form. Following informed consent, participants were prescribed oral progesterone to be taken 400 mg twice per day for 3 days then 400 mg at night until completion of a 19 day course. Pregnancy viability was assessed by ultrasound scan after 14 days of progesterone treatment. Between October 2020 and June 2021, nine women contacted the PAMper trial, of whom six enrolled and commenced progesterone treatment. These women reported ingesting mifepristone at 40-70 days of gestation, with progesterone being commenced within 5.7-72 h of mifepristone ingestion. Five participants had ongoing, live pregnancies at the primary endpoint (ultrasound at >2 weeks). One participant had a miscarriage after 9 days of progesterone treatment. There were no clinically significant adverse events. This small study demonstrated a clinically sound protocol for researching the use of progesterone-after-mifepristone for women in this circumstance. Results of this pilot study support the need for further larger scale trials in this field.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Australasian Pharmaceutical Science Association
ID : N/A
Organisme : Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New England
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Références
Baird B. Medical abortion in Australia: a short history. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;23(46):169-176.
Australian Government Department of Health. Pharmaceutical benefits scheme and repatriation pharmaceutical benefits scheme section 85 supply data. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2022 Available from: https://www.pbs.gov.au/info/statistics/dos-and-dop/dos-and-dop
Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG). Product information-MS-2. Step Canberra: Therapeutic Goods Administration; 2017 [PI for ARTG ID 210574 (pdf)]. Available from: https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2014-PI-01965-1&d=202003181016933
Delgado G, Condly SJ, Davenport ML, Tinnakornsrisuphap T, Mack J, Khauv V, et al. A case series detailing the successful reversal of the effects of mifepristone using progesterone. Issues Law Med. 2018;33(1):3-13.
Garratt D, Turner JV. Progesterone for preventing pregnancy termination after initiation of medical abortion with mifepristone. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(6):472-475.
Creinin MD, Hou MY, Dalton L, Steward R, Chen MJ. Mifepristone antagonization with progesterone to prevent medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(1):158-165.
Grossman D, White K, Harris L, Reeves M, Blumenthal PD, Winikoff B, et al. Continuing pregnancy after mifepristone and “reversal” of first-trimester medical abortion: a systematic review. Contraception. 2015;92(3):206-211.
Delgado G, Davenport ML. Progesterone use to reverse the effects of mifepristone. Ann Pharmacother. 2012;46(12):e36.
Garratt D, Turner JV. Providing women with full reproductive choice options: the point of researching medical abortion reversal. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018;23(3):242-243.
A'Hern RP. Sample size tables for exact single-stage phase II designs. Stat Med. 2001;20:859-866.
Davenport ML, Delgado G, Harrison MP, Khauv V. Embryo survival after mifepristone: a systematic review of the literature. Issues Law Med. 2017;32(1):3-18.
Damkier P, Videbech P. The safety of second-generation antipsychotics during pregnancy: a clinically focused review. CNS Drugs. 2018;32(4):351-366.
Sakai T, Ohtsu F, Mori C, Tanabe K, Goto N. Signal of miscarriage with aripiprazole: a disproportionality analysis of the Japanese adverse drug event report database. Drug Saf. 2017;40(11):1141-1146.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management (NG126 update). [C] Progestogens for preventing miscarriage. United Kingdom: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2021.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management (NG126). United Kingdom: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2019.
Lindquist S, Kjaer SK, Albieri V, Frederiksen K, Hansen T, Nohr B, et al. Fertility drugs and incidence of thyroid cancer in a Danish nationwide cohort of 146 024 infertile women. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(4):838-847.
Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG). Prometrium 100 and 200 mg, soft capsule. Canberra: Therapeutic Goods Administration; 2016 [PI for ARTG ID 232818 (pdf)]. Available from: https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2016-PI-02089-1
Bernard N, Elefant E, Carlier P, Tebacher M, Barjhoux CE, Bos-Thompson MA, et al. Continuation of pregnancy after first-trimester exposure to mifepristone: an observational prospective study. BJOG. 2013;120(5):568-574.
Kovacs L, Sas M, Resch BA, Ugocsai G, Swahn ML, Bygdeman M, et al. Termination of very early pregnancy by RU 486-an antiprogestational compound. Contraception. 1984;29(5):399-410.
Sarkar NN. Mifepristone: bioavailability, pharmacokinetics and use-effectiveness. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;101(2):113-120.
Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG). Product information-mifepristone Linepharma 200 mg tablet. Canberra: Therapeutic Goods Administration; 2017 [PI for ARTG ID 175671 (pdf)]. Available from: https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2012-PI-02513-1&d=202003161016933
Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research. Abortion Care Guideline. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
Skuster P, Dhillon J, Li J. Easing of regulatory barriers to telemedicine abortion in response to COVID-19. Front Glob Womens Health. 2021;2:705611.
Women's Health Committee. The use of mifepristone for medical termination of pregnancy (C-Gyn 21). The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2007 rev 2019.
Seymour JW, Melville C, Thompson TA, Grossman D. Effectiveness and safety of a direct-to-patient telehealth service providing medication abortion targeted at rural and remote populations: cross-sectional findings from Marie Stopes Australia. Contraception. 2022;115:67-68.