Delphi consensus study to develop guidelines for the management of adults with borderline personality disorder in the emergency department: a protocol.
ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE
PSYCHIATRY
Personality disorders
Suicide & self-harm
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 11 2023
09 11 2023
Historique:
medline:
13
11
2023
pubmed:
10
11
2023
entrez:
9
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Clinicians caring for adults with borderline personality disorder (BPD) in acute settings such as the emergency department (ED) have little evidence/guidance to base decisions on. Specific/detailed guidance for managing BPD in the ED is needed given the morbidity and mortality risks, high service utilisation, unique challenges and risk of iatrogenic interventions. The primary objective of this study is to use a consensus method to develop a guideline for managing adults with BPD in the ED. This protocol and the key questions for the guideline were developed with the advice of people with BPD and their family members/support persons. We will perform a four-phase Delphi study of an expert panel of clinicians, researchers, adults with BPD and their family members/support persons. Various disciplines (psychiatry, psychology, emergency medicine, nursing, social work) and treatment approaches will be included in the expert panel. An online questionnaire will be developed from systematic reviews, qualitative assessments of pivotal literature, and opinions suggested by the panel (phase 1). The panel will rate their agreement on opinions for each key question covering areas of emergency care of adults with BPD using two rounds of this questionnaire (phases 2 and 3). Opinions meeting predefined thresholds for consensus will be brought to consensus meetings moderated by an independent chair (phase 4). The purpose of these meetings is to finalise the set and phrasing of the opinions for each area of emergency care. These final opinions will be the recommendations in the guideline. If there are significant differences of opinion, the guideline will present both recommendations alongside one another. This study has received ethics approval by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and national professional and patient/family/support associations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37945306
pii: bmjopen-2023-075119
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075119
pmc: PMC10649594
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e075119Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: PL is a codeveloper of GPM and VH published an expert opinion on the management of BPD in the ED based on GPM principles.
Références
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2016 Sep-Oct;24(5):357-66
pubmed: 27603743
J Adv Nurs. 2003 Feb;41(4):376-82
pubmed: 12581103
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 20;153(2):99-111
pubmed: 20621892
BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):376-80
pubmed: 7640549
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Oct;158(10 Suppl):1-52
pubmed: 11665545
Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):3-10
pubmed: 27115476
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Sep;58(9):1199-204
pubmed: 17766566
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2018 Dec;41(4):583-593
pubmed: 30447726
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Jun 5;22(8):37
pubmed: 32504127
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 01;74(4):319-328
pubmed: 28249086
Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;196(1):4-12
pubmed: 20044651