The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.

Metastasectomy Metastasis-directed therapy Oligometastatic Prostate cancer Radiation therapy

Journal

European urology
ISSN: 1873-7560
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7512719

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 28 03 2023
revised: 15 09 2023
accepted: 16 10 2023
medline: 10 11 2023
pubmed: 10 11 2023
entrez: 9 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is used widely in the management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. Data are continuously emerging from well-designed prospective studies. To summarise and report the evidence on oncological and safety outcomes of MDT in the management of mPCa patients. We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for prospective studies assessing progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival (ADT-FS), overall survival (OS), and/or adverse events (AEs) in mPCa patients treated with MDT. A meta-analysis was performed for 1- and 2-yr PFS, LC, ADT-FS, OS, and rate of AEs. Meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were performed to account for heterogeneity and identify moderators. We identified 22 prospective studies (n = 1137), including two randomised controlled trials (n = 116). Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis (n = 120). The estimated 2-yr PFS was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36-56%) or 42% (95% CI: 33-52%) after excluding studies using biochemical or ADT-related endpoints. The estimated 2-yr LC, ADT-FS, and OS were 97% (95% CI: 94-98%), 55% (95% CI: 44-65%), and 97% (95% CI: 95-98%), respectively. Rates of treatment-related grade 2 and ≥3 AEs were 2.4% (95% CI: 0.2-7%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0-1%), respectively. MDT is a promising treatment strategy associated with favourable PFS, excellent LC, and a low toxicity profile that allows oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive patients to avoid or defer ADT-related toxicity. Integration of MDT with other therapies offers a promising research direction, in particular, in conjunction with systemic treatments and as a component of definitive care for oligometastatic PCa. However, in the absence of randomised trials, using MDT for treatment intensification remains an experimental approach, and the impact on OS is uncertain. Direct treatment of metastases is a promising option for selected prostate cancer patients. It can delay hormone therapy and is being investigated as a way of intensifying treatment at the expense of manageable toxicity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37945451
pii: S0302-2838(23)03209-8
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Marcin Miszczyk (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.

Pawel Rajwa (P)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.

Takafumi Yanagisawa (T)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.

Zuzanna Nowicka (Z)

Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.

Sung Ryul Shim (SR)

Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Ekaterina Laukhtina (E)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Tatsushi Kawada (T)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.

Markus von Deimling (M)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Benjamin Pradere (B)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France.

Juan Gómez Rivas (JG)

Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Giorgio Gandaglia (G)

Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Roderick C N van den Bergh (RCN)

Department of Urology, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Gregor Goldner (G)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Stephane Supiot (S)

Department of Radiotherapy, ICO René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France.

Thomas Zilli (T)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncological Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI-EOC), Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Quoc-Dien Trinh (QD)

Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Paul L Nguyen (PL)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Alberto Briganti (A)

Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Piet Ost (P)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Guillaume Ploussard (G)

Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France.

Shahrokh F Shariat (SF)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Division of Urology, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at.

Classifications MeSH