Associations between demographics and clinical ideology, beliefs, and practice patterns: a secondary analysis of a survey of randomly sampled United States chiropractors.

Attitude of health personnel Chiropractic Healthcare systems Interdisciplinary health teams Interprofessional relations Professional identity

Journal

BMC complementary medicine and therapies
ISSN: 2662-7671
Titre abrégé: BMC Complement Med Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101761232

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 18 10 2022
accepted: 17 10 2023
medline: 13 11 2023
pubmed: 10 11 2023
entrez: 10 11 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The chiropractic profession in the United States (US) has a long history of intra-professional discourse surrounding ideology and beliefs. Large-scale efforts have evaluated 3 distinctive subgroups of US chiropractors focused on these areas of practice: spine/neuromusculoskeletal, primary care, and vertebral subluxation. To our knowledge, there have not been any prior studies exploring the factors associated with these ideology and belief characteristics of these subgroups. The purpose of this study was to explore, describe, and characterize the association of US chiropractors' ideology, beliefs, and practice patterns with: 1) chiropractic degree program of graduation, 2) years since completion of chiropractic degree, and 3) US geographic region of primary practice. This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey of a random sample of US licensed chiropractors (n = 8975). A 10% random sample was extracted from each of the 50 states and District of Columbia chiropractic regulatory board lists. The survey was conducted between March 2018-January 2020. The survey instrument consisted of 7 items that were developed to elicit these differentiating ideologies, beliefs, and practice patterns: 1) clinical examination/assessment, 2) health conditions treated, 3) role of chiropractors in the healthcare system, 4) the impact of chiropractic adjustments [spinal manipulation] in treating patients with cancer, 5) vaccination attitudes, 6) detection of subluxation on x-ray, and 7) x-ray utilization rates. Multinomial regression was used to analyze associations between these 7 ideology and practice characteristic items from the survey (dependent variables) and the 3 demographic items listed above (independent variables). Data from 3538 respondents (74.6% male) were collected with an overall response rate of 39.4%. Patterns of responses to the 7 survey items for ideologies, beliefs, and practice characteristics were significantly different based on chiropractic degree program of graduation, years since completion of chiropractic degree, and geographic region of primary practice. Among US chiropractors, chiropractic program of graduation, years since completion of chiropractic degree, and geographic region of primary practice are associated with variations in clinical ideology, beliefs, and practice patterns. The wide variation and inconsistent beliefs of US chiropractors could result in public confusion and impede interprofessional integration.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The chiropractic profession in the United States (US) has a long history of intra-professional discourse surrounding ideology and beliefs. Large-scale efforts have evaluated 3 distinctive subgroups of US chiropractors focused on these areas of practice: spine/neuromusculoskeletal, primary care, and vertebral subluxation. To our knowledge, there have not been any prior studies exploring the factors associated with these ideology and belief characteristics of these subgroups. The purpose of this study was to explore, describe, and characterize the association of US chiropractors' ideology, beliefs, and practice patterns with: 1) chiropractic degree program of graduation, 2) years since completion of chiropractic degree, and 3) US geographic region of primary practice.
METHODS METHODS
This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey of a random sample of US licensed chiropractors (n = 8975). A 10% random sample was extracted from each of the 50 states and District of Columbia chiropractic regulatory board lists. The survey was conducted between March 2018-January 2020. The survey instrument consisted of 7 items that were developed to elicit these differentiating ideologies, beliefs, and practice patterns: 1) clinical examination/assessment, 2) health conditions treated, 3) role of chiropractors in the healthcare system, 4) the impact of chiropractic adjustments [spinal manipulation] in treating patients with cancer, 5) vaccination attitudes, 6) detection of subluxation on x-ray, and 7) x-ray utilization rates. Multinomial regression was used to analyze associations between these 7 ideology and practice characteristic items from the survey (dependent variables) and the 3 demographic items listed above (independent variables).
RESULTS RESULTS
Data from 3538 respondents (74.6% male) were collected with an overall response rate of 39.4%. Patterns of responses to the 7 survey items for ideologies, beliefs, and practice characteristics were significantly different based on chiropractic degree program of graduation, years since completion of chiropractic degree, and geographic region of primary practice.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Among US chiropractors, chiropractic program of graduation, years since completion of chiropractic degree, and geographic region of primary practice are associated with variations in clinical ideology, beliefs, and practice patterns. The wide variation and inconsistent beliefs of US chiropractors could result in public confusion and impede interprofessional integration.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37946159
doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-04225-z
pii: 10.1186/s12906-023-04225-z
pmc: PMC10634061
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

404

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Références

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jul-Aug;37(6):363-76
pubmed: 25015008
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 12;11(8):e0159882
pubmed: 27517464
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 5;21(1):1049
pubmed: 34610831
J Interprof Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):259-268
pubmed: 31329474
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Mar-Apr;36(3):127-42
pubmed: 23664160
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Feb;467(2):402-11
pubmed: 18975041
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Nov-Dec;37(9):709-18
pubmed: 25439035
Chiropr Man Therap. 2011 Jun 17;19:14
pubmed: 21682859
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Feb 5;136(3):216-27
pubmed: 11827498
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):2818-25
pubmed: 19910864
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Nov;10(4):
pubmed: 34740896
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Jan;31(1):33-88
pubmed: 18308153
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Oct;44(8):637-651
pubmed: 35351338
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0236691
pubmed: 32785248
Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Feb 21;27:4
pubmed: 30828419
Chiropr Man Therap. 2018 Jul 2;26:24
pubmed: 29988608
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30 Suppl 3:S555-61
pubmed: 26105673
Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Apr 10;27:16
pubmed: 31007897
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Feb 15;142(4):260-73
pubmed: 15710959
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):3179-3187
pubmed: 33886027
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Jul-Aug;32(6):500-4
pubmed: 19712794
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jul;37(7):1136-1143
pubmed: 29985699
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;179(1):16-25
pubmed: 30508010
Chiropr Man Therap. 2016 Sep 05;24(1):30
pubmed: 27597887
Chiropr Man Therap. 2021 Feb 2;29(1):5
pubmed: 33526067
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Apr;22(2):247-52
pubmed: 26417660
J Chiropr Educ. 2018 Oct;32(2):115-125
pubmed: 29509506
Med Care. 1991 Mar;29(3):251-71
pubmed: 1997754
Popul Health Manag. 2013 Dec;16(6):390-6
pubmed: 23965043
Chiropr Man Therap. 2015 Feb 02;23(1):4
pubmed: 25646145
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Mar-Apr;39(3):150-7
pubmed: 26948180
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Feb 10;14:51
pubmed: 24512507
Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Jul 24;27:36
pubmed: 31367341
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb;150:31-9
pubmed: 26730879
Nat Immunol. 2011 Jun;12(6):509-17
pubmed: 21739679
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 1;154(3):181-9
pubmed: 21282698
J Nurs Educ. 1989 Feb;28(2):72-5
pubmed: 2538602
Med Care. 2014 Dec;52(12 Suppl 5):S97-104
pubmed: 25397831
Med Care Res Rev. 2005 Jun;62(3):339-57
pubmed: 15894708
J Chiropr Humanit. 2016 Nov 04;23(1):14-21
pubmed: 27920614
J Clin Nurs. 2001 Jul;10(4):419-28
pubmed: 11822488

Auteurs

Zachary A Cupler (ZA)

Butler VA Health Care System, Butler, PA, USA. Zachary.cupler@va.gov.
Institute for Clinical Research Education, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Zachary.cupler@va.gov.

Jordan A Gliedt (JA)

Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Stephen M Perle (SM)

Big Data Interrogation Group, AECC University College, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK.
Discipline of Chiropractic, College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.

Aaron A Puhl (AA)

Private Practice, Able Body Health Clinic, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.

Michael J Schneider (MJ)

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH