Comparative efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.

Axial spondyloarthritis Network meta-analysis Systematic literature review b/tsDMARDs nr-axSpA r-axSpA

Journal

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1462-0332
Titre abrégé: Rheumatology (Oxford)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883501

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 11 07 2023
revised: 19 09 2023
accepted: 17 10 2023
medline: 10 11 2023
pubmed: 10 11 2023
entrez: 10 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To compare the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks, a selective inhibitor of interleukin‑17F and 17A, with biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A systematic literature review identified randomised controlled trials until January 2023 for inclusion in Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs), including three b/tsDMARDs exposure networks: predominantly-naïve, naïve, and experienced. Outcomes were Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)20, ASAS40, and ASAS partial remission (PR) response rates at 12-16 weeks. A safety NMA investigated discontinuations due to any reason and serious adverse events at 12-16 weeks. The NMA included 36 trials. The predominantly-naïve network provided the most comprehensive results. In the predominantly-naïve nr-axSpA analysis, bimekizumab had significantly higher ASAS20 response rates vs secukinumab 150 mg (with loading dose [LD]/without LD), and comparable response rates vs other active comparators. In the predominantly-naïve AS analysis, bimekizumab had significantly higher ASAS40 response rates vs secukinumab 150 mg (without LD), significantly higher ASAS-PR response rates vs secukinumab 150 mg (with LD), and comparable response rates vs other active comparators. Bimekizumab demonstrated similar safety to other b/tsDMARDs. Across ASAS outcomes, bimekizumab was comparable to most b/tsDMARDs, including ixekizumab, TNF inhibitors and upadacitinib, and achieved higher response rates vs secukinumab for some ASAS outcomes in predominantly b/tsDMARD-naïve nr-axSpA and AS patients at 12-16 weeks. In a pooled axSpA network, bimekizumab demonstrated comparable safety vs other b/tsDMARDs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37947318
pii: 7382219
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead598
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.

Auteurs

Atul Deodhar (A)

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Pedro M Machado (PM)

University College London, London, UK.

Michael Mørup (M)

UCB Pharma, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Vanessa Taieb (V)

UCB Pharma, Colombes, France.

Damon Willems (D)

UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium.

Michelle Orme (M)

ICERA Consulting Ltd, Swindon, UK.

David Pritchett (D)

Source Health Economics, London, UK.

Lianne S Gensler (LS)

Department of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH