Benefits and risks: Views of humanitarian organizations in Lebanon on corporate assistance.
Journal
PLOS global public health
ISSN: 2767-3375
Titre abrégé: PLOS Glob Public Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918283779606676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
18
05
2023
accepted:
17
10
2023
medline:
10
11
2023
pubmed:
10
11
2023
entrez:
10
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Compounding humanitarian and political crises within and across countries have been met with shrinking public resources for coordination, recovery, and mitigation. This resource constrained humanitarian environment presents opportunities for multinational corporations to supplement budgets and actively participate in new markets through connecting with humanitarian work. Given the well-established influence of corporations on public health, an assessment of industry funding to humanitarian assistance is necessary especially in the fragile context of Lebanon with a substantial refugee population and multiple compounding crises. This paper examines three aspects of corporate assistance in humanitarian crises in Lebanon. It investigates the modality of corporate assistance to humanitarian agencies, the extent to which humanitarian agency staff are aware of implications of this assistance along with any ethical considerations related to it, and both the risks and benefits for corporations and people. This study explores the views of 14 local and international humanitarian agencies in Lebanon) through in-depth interviews conducted between 2020 and 2022. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and subject to thematic analysis. All agencies participating in the study provided social and health assistance as well as education, vocational training, and other services to refugees or Lebanese. Findings indicate that the majority of them receive corporate funding in varying amounts and in-kind contributions to support various projects. Despite imposed conditions by the corporations, such as posting logos and stories, the agencies perceived the benefits of partnering, mentioning financial assistance in time of need, and flexible agendas that outweigh the risks of conflicts of interest of corporate branding on the populations they serve. Benefits to the corporations themselves relate to corporate social responsibility, increased market reach and visibility. Challenges in partnering with for-profits include ethical considerations and programmatic issues, however no guidelines were reported to exist to detect corporate conflicts of interest, instead most of the agencies rely on their value systems for screening.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37948345
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002291
pii: PGPH-D-23-00783
pmc: PMC10637641
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0002291Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Makhoul et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(2):353-62
pubmed: 25674798
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;68(3):226-31
pubmed: 26157184
Eur J Public Health. 2011 Aug;21(4):400-1
pubmed: 21771738
Can J Public Health. 2016 Dec 27;107(4-5):e390-e392
pubmed: 28026703
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Mar;15(3):503-17
pubmed: 22014282
Am J Public Health. 2018 Sep;108(9):1167-1170
pubmed: 30024808
J Public Health Policy. 2008 Apr;29(1):86-104; discussion 105
pubmed: 18368021
Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1380-1382
pubmed: 32919521