Bracing or kinesio taping in the management of lateral elbow tendinopathy: A prospective, randomized single-blinded trial.

Forearm counterforce brace Kinesio taping Lateral elbow tendinopathy Lateral epicondylitis Pain pressure threshold Patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation questionnaire

Journal

Journal of bodywork and movement therapies
ISSN: 1532-9283
Titre abrégé: J Bodyw Mov Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9700068

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2023
Historique:
received: 02 08 2021
revised: 01 06 2023
accepted: 04 07 2023
medline: 13 11 2023
pubmed: 11 11 2023
entrez: 10 11 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of the study was to compare the effects of forearm counter force brace (FCB) and kinesio taping (KT) on pain severity, grip strength and functionality of patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET). The study was planned as a prospective, randomized and assessor-blinded study with 1-month follow-up period. Seventy-two patients, diagnosed as LET were randomly assigned to FCB (n = 41) or KT (n = 31) groups. In the FCB group, the patients were informed and instructed to wear the brace for three weeks continuously. In the KT group, tape was applied once a week for four weeks with muscle inhibition and fascia correction techniques. The outcome measures were pain pressure threshold (PPT), maximal pain-free hand grip strength measurement and patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation questionnaire (PRTEE). The assessments were performed at the baseline, immediately after treatment and one month later after treatment. PPT and grip strength were significantly increased over time in both groups. Pain, function and total scores of PRTEE were significantly decreased in both FCB and KT groups. The effect size of the improvement in PRTEE function score was within acceptable clinical significance in the KT group. However, there was no significant difference between groups. Pain severity, grip strength and functionality of patients with LET improved over time in both FCB and KT groups. However, neither was superior in the management of LET.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37949566
pii: S1360-8592(23)00153-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.07.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

235-243

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflict of interests.

Auteurs

Öznur Çelik (Ö)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye. Electronic address: celikozn@gmail.com.

Süreyya Şencan (S)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH