Surgical experience in repairing the right common carotid artery and the right internal jugular vein after ECMO in neonates: early clinical results.
ECMO
Early results
Neonates
Vascular anastomosis
Journal
Italian journal of pediatrics
ISSN: 1824-7288
Titre abrégé: Ital J Pediatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101510759
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Nov 2023
10 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
08
02
2023
accepted:
29
10
2023
medline:
13
11
2023
pubmed:
11
11
2023
entrez:
11
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to summarize the early clinical results and surgical experience of repairing the right common carotid artery and the right internal jugular vein after ECMO treatment in neonates. We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 16 neonates with circulatory and respiratory failure who were treated with ECMO via the right common carotid artery and the right internal jugular vein in our hospital from June 2021 to December 2022. The effects of repairing the common carotid artery and internal jugular vein were evaluated. All 16 patients successfully underwent right cervical vascular cannulation, and the ECMO cycle was successfully established. Twelve patients were successfully removed from ECMO. The right common carotid artery and the right internal jugular vein were successfully repaired in these 12 patients. There was unobstructed arterial blood flow in 9 patients, mild stenosis in 1 patient, moderate stenosis in 1 patient and obstruction in 1 patient. There was unobstructed venous blood flow in 10 patients, mild stenosis in 1 patient, and moderate stenosis in 1 patient. No thrombosis was found in the right internal jugular vein. Thrombosis was found in the right common carotid artery of one patient. Repairing the right common carotid artery and the right internal jugular vein after ECMO treatment in neonates was feasible, and careful surgical anastomosis techniques and standardized postoperative anticoagulation management can ensure early vascular patency. However, long-term vascular patency is still being assessed in follow-up.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to summarize the early clinical results and surgical experience of repairing the right common carotid artery and the right internal jugular vein after ECMO treatment in neonates.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 16 neonates with circulatory and respiratory failure who were treated with ECMO via the right common carotid artery and the right internal jugular vein in our hospital from June 2021 to December 2022. The effects of repairing the common carotid artery and internal jugular vein were evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
All 16 patients successfully underwent right cervical vascular cannulation, and the ECMO cycle was successfully established. Twelve patients were successfully removed from ECMO. The right common carotid artery and the right internal jugular vein were successfully repaired in these 12 patients. There was unobstructed arterial blood flow in 9 patients, mild stenosis in 1 patient, moderate stenosis in 1 patient and obstruction in 1 patient. There was unobstructed venous blood flow in 10 patients, mild stenosis in 1 patient, and moderate stenosis in 1 patient. No thrombosis was found in the right internal jugular vein. Thrombosis was found in the right common carotid artery of one patient.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Repairing the right common carotid artery and the right internal jugular vein after ECMO treatment in neonates was feasible, and careful surgical anastomosis techniques and standardized postoperative anticoagulation management can ensure early vascular patency. However, long-term vascular patency is still being assessed in follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37950294
doi: 10.1186/s13052-023-01556-y
pii: 10.1186/s13052-023-01556-y
pmc: PMC10636893
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
149Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Pediatr Surg. 1991 Apr;26(4):357-9; discussion 359-61
pubmed: 2056394
Am J Dis Child. 1990 Aug;144(8):872-4
pubmed: 2198805
Pediatrics. 2000 Dec;106(6):1339-43
pubmed: 11099586
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jun;188(6):1636-42
pubmed: 17515387
Front Pediatr. 2019 Sep 27;7:398
pubmed: 31612124
J Pediatr. 1999 Apr;134(4):428-33
pubmed: 10190916
World J Pediatr. 2016 Aug;12(3):364-367
pubmed: 27351572
J Pediatr. 1988 Jul;113(1 Pt 1):110-3
pubmed: 3385518
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Jul;53(7):1301-1304
pubmed: 29459043
Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;50(3):480-490
pubmed: 34637418
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Sep;39(9):1594-601
pubmed: 23749154
Pediatr Surg Int. 2000;16(1-2):15-8
pubmed: 10663826
Crit Care Clin. 2017 Oct;33(4):825-841
pubmed: 28887930
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr 15;191(8):894-901
pubmed: 25695688
ASAIO J. 2020 Apr;66(4):447-453
pubmed: 31335369
Semin Perinatol. 2018 Mar;42(2):80-88
pubmed: 29305227
Crit Care Med. 2005 Dec;33(12):2817-24
pubmed: 16352965
Radiology. 1992 May;183(2):453-6
pubmed: 1561349
Adv Neonatal Care. 2016 Feb;16(1):26-36
pubmed: 26808515
Acta Physiol Scand. 1983 Jan;117(1):131-7
pubmed: 6858701
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Jan;50(1):64-8
pubmed: 25598095
ASAIO J. 2017 Jul/Aug;63(4):456-463
pubmed: 28557863
Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):364-70
pubmed: 20959787
Semin Perinatol. 2005 Feb;29(1):2-7
pubmed: 15921146