Influence of universal adhesives and silane coupling primer on bonding performance to CAD-CAM resin-based composites: A laboratory investigation.
adhesive/cohesive failure
dental adhesion
dental air abrasion
dental bonding
light curing of dental adhesives
surface pretreatment
Journal
Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]
ISSN: 1708-8240
Titre abrégé: J Esthet Restor Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101096515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Apr 2024
Historique:
revised:
16
10
2023
received:
06
06
2023
accepted:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
11
11
2023
medline:
11
11
2023
entrez:
11
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Obtaining strong resin bonds to computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) resin-based composites with dispersed fillers (CCRBCs) poses a challenge. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of three universal adhesives and a two-component silane coupling agent on the shear bond strength to three (CCRBCs). Eight hundred and sixty-four specimens of Brilliant Crios, Lava Ultimate, and Tetric CAD were polished or grit blasted, bonded with Adhese Universal DC, One Coat 7 Universal (OC7), and Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive (SBU) with or without a silane primer. Shear bond strength was measured after 24 h and 10,000 thermocycles. Linear regressions were performed (α = 0.05). After thermocycling, bond strengths were similar for the universal adhesives on polished Brilliant Crios and Lava Ultimate (p ≥ 0.408). Grit blasted Tetric CAD showed no significant differences (p ≥ 0.096). The silane primer had minimal impact on grit blasted Tetric CAD (p ≥ 0.384). The silane primer increased the bond strength of OC7 to Brilliant Crios (p = 0.001) but decreased the adhesion of SBU to Brilliant Crios and Lava Ultimate (p ≤ 0.018). Bond strength of universal adhesives varied with CCRBC type. The two-component silane coupling agent showed mixed effects on adhesive performance. Selecting universal adhesives from the same CCRBC product line does not always guarantee superior bond strength. The efficacy of silane coupling agents differs based on the bonding substrate.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
620-631Subventions
Organisme : Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft
Organisme : Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Stiftung
Informations de copyright
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, Dewael TY, Sadoun MJ. From artisanal to CAD-CAM blocks: state of the art of indirect composites. J Dent Res. 2016;95(5):487-495.
Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC. CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials for natural teeth. J Dent Res. 2018;97(10):1082-1091.
Ceylan G, Emir F, Doğdu C, Demirel M, Özcan M. Effect of repeated millings on the surface integrity of diamond burs and roughness of different CAD/CAM materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(8):5325-5337.
Calheiros-Lobo MJ, Carbas R, da Silva LFM, Pinho T. Impact of in vitro findings on clinical protocols for the adhesion of CAD-CAM blocks: a systematic integrative review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.024
Komine F, Honda J, Kusaba K, Kubochi K, Takata H, Fujisawa M. Clinical outcomes of single crown restorations fabricated with resin-based CAD/CAM materials. J Oral Sci. 2020;62(4):353-355.
Zhang L, Hou X-X, Aishan M, Tian MT, He HY. A 3-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with resin nanoceramic computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM)-fabricated partial crowns. Med Sci Monit. 2022;28:e937331. doi:10.12659/MSM.937331
Nguyen J-F, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater. 2012;28(5):529-534.
Emsermann I, Eggmann F, Krastl G, Weiger R, Amato J. Influence of pretreatment methods on the adhesion of composite and polymer infiltrated ceramic CAD-CAM blocks. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(5):433-443.
Reymus M, Roos M, Eichberger M, Edelhoff D, Hickel R, Stawarczyk B. Bonding to new CAD/CAM resin composites: influence of air abrasion and conditioning agents as pretreatment strategy. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(2):529-538.
Abdou A, Takagaki T, Alghamdi A, et al. Bonding performance of dispersed filler resin composite CAD/CAM blocks with different surface treatment protocols. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(1):209-219.
Maravić T, Mazzitelli C, Mancuso E, et al. Resin composite cements: current status and a novel classification proposal. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35:1085-1097. doi:10.1111/jerd.13036
Swift EJ, Perdigão J, Combe EC, et al. Effects of restorative and adhesive curing methods on dentin bond strengths. Am J Dent. 2001;14(3):137-140.
Matinlinna JP, Lung CYK, Tsoi JKH. Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: a review. Dent Mater. 2018;34(1):13-28.
Almaskin D, Alzaher ZA, Qaw M, et al. The bond strength of a universal adhesive system with silane to lithium disilicates in comparison with an isolated silane coupling agent. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(6):512-520.
Queiroz JRC, Benetti P, Özcan M, et al. Surface characterization of feldspathic ceramic using ATR FT-IR and ellipsometry after various silanization protocols. Dent Mater. 2012;28(2):189-196.
Hagino R, Mine A, Kawaguchi-Uemura A, et al. Adhesion procedures for CAD/CAM indirect resin composite block: a new resin primer versus a conventional silanizing agent. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(3):319-325.
Yoshida K, Kamada K, Atsuta M. Effects of two silane coupling agents, a bonding agent, and thermal cycling on the bond strength of a CAD/CAM composite material cemented with two resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(2):184-189.
Lise DP, van Ende A, de Munck J, Vieira LCC, Baratieri LN, van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of composite cement to novel CAD/CAM materials as a function of surface treatment and aging. Oper Dent. 2017;42(1):73-81.
Şişmanoğlu S, Gürcan AT, Yıldırım-Bilmez Z, Turunç-Oğuzman R, Gümüştaş B. Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(1):22-32.
Shinohara A, Taira Y, Sakihara M, Sawase T. Effects of three silane primers and five adhesive agents on the bond strength of composite material for a computer-aided design and manufacturing system. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20170342. doi:10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0342
Eldafrawy M, Greimers L, Bekaert S, et al. Silane influence on bonding to CAD-CAM composites: an interfacial fracture toughness study. Dent Mater. 2019;35(9):1279-1290.
Sarahneh O, Günal-Abduljalil B. The effect of silane and universal adhesives on the micro-shear bond strength of current resin-matrix ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021;13(5):292-303.
Günal-Abduljalil B, Önöral Ö, Ongun S. Micro-shear bond strengths of resin-matrix ceramics subjected to different surface conditioning strategies with or without coupling agent application. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021;13(3):180-190.
Fathy H, Hamama HH, El-Wassefy N, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on resin-matrix CAD/CAM ceramics bonding to dentin: in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):635.
Mendes LT, Loomans BAC, Opdam NJM, Silva CLD, Casagrande L, Lenzi TL. Silane coupling agents are beneficial for resin composite repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(5):443-453.
Fouquet V, Lachard F, Abdel-Gawad S, Dursun E, Attal JP, François P. Shear bond strength of a direct resin composite to CAD-CAM composite blocks: relative contribution of micromechanical and chemical block surface treatment. Materials. 2022;15(14):5018.
Daher R, Ardu S, Di Bella E, et al. Efficiency of 3D-printed composite resin restorations compared with subtractive materials: evaluation of fatigue behavior, cost, and time of production. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.001
Liebermann A, Detzer J, Stawarczyk B. Impact of recently developed universal adhesives on tensile bond strength to computer-aided design/manufacturing ceramics. Oper Dent. 2019;44(4):386-395.
Alegría-Acevedo LF, Gutiérrez MF, Perdigão J, et al. In vitro performance of different universal adhesive systems on several CAD/CAM restorative materials after thermal aging. Oper Dent. 2022;47(1):107-120.
Eggmann F, Mante FK, Conejo J, et al. Shear bond strength of three universal adhesives to three CAD-CAM resin-based composites with and without a silane coupling agent (dataset). Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10003543
Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Sonoda A, et al. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in ‘universal’ adhesives. Dent Mater. 2016;32(10):1218-1225.
Chin A, Ikeda M, Takagaki T, et al. Effects of immediate and delayed cementations for CAD/CAM resin block after alumina air abrasion on adhesion to newly developed resin cement. Materials. 2021;14(22):7058.
Lee H-S, Kwon T-Y. The application of a novel ceramic liner improves bonding between zirconia and veneering porcelain. Materials. 2017;10(9):1023.
Shimatani Y, Tsujimoto A, Nojiri K, et al. Reconsideration of enamel etching protocols for universal adhesives: effect of etching method and etching time. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(4):345-354.
Imbery TA, Bergeron SY, Boyle J. Radiant exitance of old, new, and damaged LED light curing units. Oper Dent. 2022;47(6):693-700.
Blumer L, Schmidli F, Weiger R, Fischer J. A systematic approach to standardize artificial aging of resin composite cements. Dent Mater. 2015;31(7):855-863.
Eldafrawy M, Ebroin MG, Gailly PA, Nguyen JF, Sadoun MJ, Mainjot AK. Bonding to CAD-CAM composites: an interfacial fracture toughness approach. J Dent Res. 2018;97(1):60-67.
Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e78-e93.
Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Yoshihara K, Minagi S, Matsumoto T, Irie M. Does 8-methacryloxyoctyl trimethoxy silane (8-MOTS) improve initial bond strength on lithium disilicate glass ceramic? Dent Mater. 2017;33(3):e95-e100.
Queiroz-Lima G, Strazzi-Sahyon HB, Maluly-Proni AT, et al. Surface characterization of indirect restorative materials submitted to different etching protocols. J Dent. 2022;127:104348. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104348