Empirically-based dynamic risk and protective factors for sexual offending.
Dynamic risk assessment
Intervention
Protective factors
Risk factors
Sexual offending
Journal
Clinical psychology review
ISSN: 1873-7811
Titre abrégé: Clin Psychol Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8111117
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
24
04
2023
revised:
29
08
2023
accepted:
30
10
2023
medline:
1
12
2023
pubmed:
12
11
2023
entrez:
11
11
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This review provides an overview and update of empirical evidence for psychologically meaningful dynamic risk factors and protective factors for sexual offending. Using the review by Mann et al. (2010) as a starting point, we reviewed relevant literature that has appeared since this publication, focusing on meta-analyses, systematic and scoping reviews of dynamic risk factors, recent evaluations of commonly used dynamic assessment tools, and studies of dynamic risk and protective factors in community samples in addition to clinical or forensic samples. Two risk factors previously deemed promising by Mann et al. (2010), hostility towards women and dysfunctional coping (conceptualized as hostile masculinity and emotional regulation deficits, respectively, in this review), could now be considered supported using this review's criteria of three or more studies demonstrating an effect size of 0.15 or greater. No new risk factors were identified. We conducted a broader search of protective factors in recognition of the relative newness of this literature: Positive social support was the only protective factor identified as empirically supported. We also discuss situational risk and protective factors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37951100
pii: S0272-7358(23)00113-7
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102355
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102355Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.